Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
A question for the flight instructors (PPL) >

A question for the flight instructors (PPL)

Search

Notices

A question for the flight instructors (PPL)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2024 | 06:26 AM
  #11  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,200
Likes: 813
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul
He could have easily done his checkride, it’s not like they put you in an inverted spin partial panel recover on the tach and compass only.
I don't think so. First off, he can't legally even conduct the checkride if all of the requisite training hasn't been completed.

Seccond, examiners generally cannot do any teaching on cert/rating checkrides. There might be a slim grey area... "I need you to do that stall again, but less aggressive on the recovery". But they certainly can't train a new subject
Reply
Old 05-29-2024 | 10:04 AM
  #12  
TiredSoul's Avatar
All is fine at .79
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 4,490
Likes: 43
From: Paahlot
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I don't think so. First off, he can't legally even conduct the checkride if all of the requisite training hasn't been completed.

Seccond, examiners generally cannot do any teaching on cert/rating checkrides. There might be a slim grey area... "I need you to do that stall again, but less aggressive on the recovery". But they certainly can't train a new subject
All true, however he must have done at least the required simulated instrument.
Not necessarily logged including “unusual attitude recovery”.
DPE didn’t know until he was told.
I’ve had students claim they had not been taught a particular item by me or their instructor usually after the failed checkride.
We had a pretty extensive record keeping system where the student had to log in and electronically sign for the lesson completion with their PIN.
I’ve had non native English speakers get confused in the nomenclature, power-on stall vs departure stall etc.
Maybe the individual was taught but got confused.
Reply
Old 05-29-2024 | 11:37 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,187
Likes: 669
Default

Originally Posted by Boatbuilder
Thanks y'all. Last time I had a look at the PPL requirements was back in the mid 80's. 👨‍🦳
No hood or google work back then. Not surprised it's been added.
He's actually got 160 hours. The fact his instructor signed him off for the checkride without going teaching unusual attitude recovery or going over ALL the requirements prior to the check is another red flag.
Just make sure he yells "UPSET, RECOVER!!' at the examiner and he should be good.
Reply
Old 05-29-2024 | 12:13 PM
  #14  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Boatbuilder
Is unusual attitudes under the hood a requirement for a PPL now? Seems like that would be an instrument exam.
It's been required at least since 1997. That is 27 years ago.

Ref. 61.109 as of July 30, 1997
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...f/97-19963.pdf

Ref. FAA-S-8081-14:
https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/.../AC61-118A.pdf

Last edited by dmspilot; 05-29-2024 at 12:26 PM. Reason: added "at least" and references
Reply
Old 05-29-2024 | 01:16 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,562
Likes: 1,227
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul
All true, however he must have done at least the required simulated instrument.
Not necessarily logged including “unusual attitude recovery”.
DPE didn’t know until he was told.
I’ve had students claim they had not been taught a particular item by me or their instructor usually after the failed checkride.
We had a pretty extensive record keeping system where the student had to log in and electronically sign for the lesson completion with their PIN.
I’ve had non native English speakers get confused in the nomenclature, power-on stall vs departure stall etc.
Maybe the individual was taught but got confused.
61.109a3. 3 hours simulated instrument... including recovery from unusual attitudes.

Yes, he technically was signed off without the required training per the FARs. The DPE, in doing a logbook review, didn't catch that the CFI did not annotate unusual attitude recovery. But that doesn't change the fact that the training is required.
Reply
Old 05-30-2024 | 12:27 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
Liked
20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 131
Default

Originally Posted by Boatbuilder
I've got a friend and neighbor that recently bought a Cirrus. He's been taking instruction in it from a Cirrus factory certified instructor.
He went for his check ride today after amassing @ 150 hours.
Got through the oral no problem. When the examiner went over what they'd be doing for the check he mentioned unusual attitude recovery while under the hood. His instructor had never done this with him. He informed the examiner of this and fortunately the examinar just put it down as an incomplete and postponed the practical portion of the exam.
It's been MANY years since I taught PPL. Is unusual attitudes under the hood a requirement for a PPL now? Seems like that would be an instrument exam.
Is it possible that he DID do unusual attitudes and he just doesn’t remember? If he had good time I’d say it’s likely he did it and forgot.

Also, we’re all so tuned into people getting a PPL fast especially at academies but i’ll take the opposite approach and say there is zero wrong with doing it in more hours in a cirrus if you’re going to be a rich weekend warrior.
Reply
Old 05-30-2024 | 07:02 PM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 381
Likes: 56
Default

Originally Posted by Boatbuilder
His instructor was an older gentleman. One of the delays in scheduling the checkride was they hadn't done any night flying, despite having over 120 hours at that point. I told my friend how unusual that was, at least back when I was teaching.
I definitely think there was a bit of fleecing going on.
It sounds to me like the CFI is trying to pay back his tuition to take the CSIP course. This story is absolutely ridiculous. If there is no record of the required training being conducted, and the CFI still made the endorsement stating all required training was complete, he should be disciplined.
Reply
Old 05-31-2024 | 04:01 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,562
Likes: 1,227
Default

Originally Posted by marcal
Is it possible that he DID do unusual attitudes and he just doesn’t remember? If he had good time I’d say it’s likely he did it and forgot.

Also, we’re all so tuned into people getting a PPL fast especially at academies but i’ll take the opposite approach and say there is zero wrong with doing it in more hours in a cirrus if you’re going to be a rich weekend warrior.
At the the very least, even the most inexperienced CFI would know run through a few checkride profiles and that would always include hood time and unusual attitudes..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RJSAviator76
Southwest
238
08-24-2022 07:53 PM
peengleeson
Flight Schools and Training
31
10-22-2018 07:39 AM
glyde
Major
121
11-11-2011 02:31 PM
757Driver
Major
26
08-09-2011 05:50 AM
SR22
Part 135
116
01-19-2010 09:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices