Search

Notices

APC Oil talk

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-2024 | 08:57 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 1,032
Default

Originally Posted by SideStickMonkey
S&P 500 Index Funds FTW!

But seriously, anyone who thinks the POTUS has much if any effect on the stock market, gas prices, price of eggs, etc etc in the short term is a partisan hack. Economic policies set by one administration generally have effects down the line. Deregulation of the banking industry took a long time before it caused the '08 recession.
Need to go back to the savings and loan debacle of 88-89. Probably before your time.
Reply
Old 11-24-2024 | 03:31 PM
  #32  
Line Holder
Veteran: Navy
5 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 322
Default

Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
Need to go back to the savings and loan debacle of 88-89. Probably before your time.
I mean, I was around.

Did I grasp the finer aspects of micro and macro economics, not quite yet.
Reply
Old 11-24-2024 | 10:04 PM
  #33  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,204
Likes: 271
Default

Originally Posted by SideStickMonkey
S&P 500 Index Funds FTW!

But seriously, anyone who thinks the POTUS has much if any effect on the stock market, gas prices, price of eggs, etc etc in the short term is a partisan hack. Economic policies set by one administration generally have effects down the line. Deregulation of the banking industry took a long time before it caused the '08 recession.
Found this to be pretty interesting.

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/mar...TJSS0hJR14v6Ew

Reply
Old 11-24-2024 | 11:21 PM
  #34  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tallpilot
That's the primary purpose of the Keystone pipeline, send the heavy sour Canadian tar sand crude to the docks by the refineries so it can be put on ships and sailed to the refineries where it can be best processed. There is some capacity for sour crude refining in Houston but most are setup to crack sweet crude.
Yep, and the other half of the issue is the regulations for commercial sailing between US ports to be done on US registered ships. Meaning the logistics of port to port transfers cause a loss in profits. Which again is why we export our oil.

trying to explain heavy/light and sweet oil chemistry was going to be too much of a task for this board so I’ve just been watching at this point. I don’t even know why I posted in the first place to be honest. For those that like funny moving pictures, and have some curiosity in learning more about it I found a video.

https://youtu.be/veTbuLu7znc?t=563

Reply
Old 11-25-2024 | 04:46 AM
  #35  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,264
Likes: 106
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Found this to be pretty interesting.

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/mar...TJSS0hJR14v6Ew

Interesting - yes. Meaningful - no. For the most part Presidents just ride the economic waves they are dealt to the best of their ability. Case in Point - Bill Clinton. Elmer Fudd could have been president when the tech boom and the internet took off in the mid to late 90s and the market would have done great. Did Bill Clinton cause the tech boom or did he just happen to be President when it took off. Well in fairness he did have Al Gore as his VP who did in fact invent the internet.

Scoop
Reply
Old 11-25-2024 | 07:49 AM
  #36  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 192
Default

Originally Posted by Extenda
I think we’re kind of talking past each other. I’m not claiming what happened the last four years was because of whoever was in charge. A series of events unfolded where we got massive seniority boost, massive pay raises, and massive stock market returns. I don’t think pointing out how the market has done the last 4 years is a strawman, as everyone clings to that as an argument whenever their candidate is in charge.

All this flies in the face of the argument that “thank God ______ got elected, now things can start to get a lot better"

My point is the last four years have been a golden age of prosperity and advancement for legacy airline pilots that is unlikely to be even close to replicated regardless of who is in charge.
Excellent post. Thank you.

Just to add a bit, for some years now those with the stratosphere incomes have had a significantly lower tax burden than those just a generation ago.
Airline pilots in the 70's were well paid. But their tax burden was higher than today's well paid pilot.

FWIW
Reply
Old 11-25-2024 | 06:09 PM
  #37  
DeltaboundRedux's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 217
From: Enoch Powell Enthusiast
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
it is indeed, but assuming infinite growth is hard to reconcile with reality.

i am not sure forcing investment with 401ks will yield infinite growth forever. large numbers catch up to us all
This kind of thinking keeps me awake at night.
Reply
Old 11-25-2024 | 06:15 PM
  #38  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
This kind of thinking keeps me awake at night.
yep. we’ve basically forced price growth for every stock. hopefully we retire before the game collapses
Reply
Old 12-04-2024 | 02:30 AM
  #39  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr
You’re living in a fantasy world. 3 weeks after the election, the S&P 500 is at 5969. On Election Day, it closed at 5782. That’s barely up 3%. A little short term pop for sure, but I don’t expect a 1% a week increase to continue going forward. Certainly not massive amounts of newly minted millionaires.

Also looking at the last 4 presidential terms (using Election Day to Election Day):

From Election 2020 to 2024, the S&P was up 77%.
From Election 2016 to 2020, the S&P was up 57%
From Election 2012 to 2016, the S&P was up 48%.
From Election 2008 to 2012, the S&P was up 55%.

Oh, and both Election 2000-2004 and Election 2004-2008 were both negative!

Draw your own conclusions, but Biden, Trump, and Obama all oversaw roughly equal periods of stock market growth.
Looks to me one President, the one nobody seems to like, was 20% above all the rest.

The President that the the Supreme Court decided was President, was 50% below the rest. Maybe it was the wars after Tora Bora that lacked much rationale, or the bubba-sphere of letting folks like "Kenny Boy" and Jeff Skilling run wild.
Reply
Old 12-04-2024 | 02:38 AM
  #40  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
This kind of thinking keeps me awake at night.
❤️

Seems we have decided to remove uncertainty.

Everyone seems to assume that the recently elected President will NOT do what he says he will do: new taxes, rounding up undocumented workers, going farther and faster than Bush or Reagan did with deregulation while replacing boring moderate expertise with political zealots.

I think he will.

Many moderates go frightened and sold into the Trump bull run last time. They missed the government spending lolapalooza that inflated equity markets and deflated purchasing power.

Where is the easy safe haven?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sobo
Major
87
07-21-2022 12:52 PM
tsupilot
Technical
12
02-01-2017 09:00 AM
gzsg
Delta
10297
07-10-2015 01:42 PM
HercDriver130
Regional
50
05-21-2008 07:33 AM
Rjetdrivr
Money Talk
0
06-02-2006 10:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices