Search

Notices

AUS high winds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-2025 | 08:17 PM
  #31  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,253
Likes: 709
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by WickedSmaht
Sorry, what? You're honestly claiming that no one in the OCC, is stopping an operation due to unsafe conditions at a destination? You do realize you're alledging an FAR violation, right?
Delta has multiple meteorological sources and always uses the most favorable one. They are oriented to go, not stop. As are all airlines and charter ops. This isn't news.
Reply
Old 03-08-2025 | 03:29 AM
  #32  
crewdawg's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,443
Likes: 440
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
You sure about that? I've been in this game for a while in both seats, albeit more time in the right seat than the left. On more than a few occasions from the right seat I've had to look the other guy square in the eye and say "hey boss, I think we oughta rethink this". Every single time, the captain has thanked me for the "moment of clarity" and then bought the beers. Never for a moment think you don't have a voice from ANY seat (left, right OR center) to say "hold on a minute, let's think this through and be sure we're sure". That is all.

So you're saying that after your recommendation, the Captain stopped the operation? I have done the same and yes FOs need to speak up, but I don't think the poster was saying that FOs don't have a say in stopping the operation.
Reply
Old 03-08-2025 | 05:07 AM
  #33  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by WickedSmaht
Sorry, what? You're honestly claiming that no one in the OCC, is stopping an operation due to unsafe conditions at a destination? You do realize you're alledging an FAR violation, right?
I had a flight last week where the dispatcher messaged to have us wait to push until the next metar came out because the current winds were above limits. It struck me as excessive given the forecast and 2 alternates, but they certainly are looking at it.
Reply
Old 03-08-2025 | 01:51 PM
  #34  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 301
Likes: 3
From: Sic semper tomato
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
OCC doesn’t always have direct visibility into every unsafe condition at every destination. More often than not, it’s the captain’s responsibility to stop the operation.

The only time a FAR violation would occur is if the OCC is aware (or reasonably should be aware) of an unsafe condition and they dispatch a flight into it anyway.
Would that be like if a X-wind limit were exceeded?
Reply
Old 03-08-2025 | 01:53 PM
  #35  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 301
Likes: 3
From: Sic semper tomato
Default

Originally Posted by bugman61
I had a flight last week where the dispatcher messaged to have us wait to push until the next metar came out because the current winds were above limits. It struck me as excessive given the forecast and 2 alternates, but they certainly are looking at it.
And did they tell you that because they wanted to be just legal to go or because the next METAR might demonstrate that it was within limits and safe to operate in there? Legit question.
Reply
Old 03-08-2025 | 01:59 PM
  #36  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 301
Likes: 3
From: Sic semper tomato
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Delta has multiple meteorological sources and always uses the most favorable one. They are oriented to go, not stop. As are all airlines and charter ops. This isn't news.
Of course they are and of course it isn't. The point being that *no one* in the OCC will stop an usafe operation is probably not accurate. The dispatchers have no incentive to push anyone to operate and can themselves be on the hook for doing so.
Reply
Old 03-08-2025 | 02:31 PM
  #37  
Line Holder
10M Airline Miles
5 Years
100 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 57
Default

Originally Posted by WickedSmaht
Of course they are and of course it isn't. The point being that *no one* in the OCC will stop an usafe operation is probably not accurate. The dispatchers have no incentive to push anyone to operate and can themselves be on the hook for doing so.
In theory you’re correct. In practice, I’ve had dispatchers plan me with routing that was right through areas of moderate turbulence for hours because it saves some fuel, or deferrals that needed to be addressed, or planned fuel loads that left no wiggle room for contingencies. So, while they may have skin in the game, the reality is that it almost always falls to the Captain to say no when appropriate. Oddly, every time I’ve changed the orginal plan(added gas, refused a jet for an MEL item that wasn’t suitable, changed the route/altitude for rides or weather) the dispatcher ALWAYS said they agreed. That tells me that their instincts are good, but perhaps the pressure from their higher ups often times overrides their instincts, and they are waiting for us to make the call. I’ve had dispatchers answer the phone by saying “I was expecting your call!”
Reply
Old 03-08-2025 | 05:05 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 1,108
Default

Originally Posted by WickedSmaht
Would that be like if a X-wind limit were exceeded?
Not in every case.
Reply
Old 03-08-2025 | 05:23 PM
  #39  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,253
Likes: 709
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by WickedSmaht
Of course they are and of course it isn't. The point being that *no one* in the OCC will stop an usafe operation is probably not accurate. The dispatchers have no incentive to push anyone to operate and can themselves be on the hook for doing so.
I requested extra fuel for deice the other day and was told they can't because we were payload optimised. I didn't push the issue because I figured it would be tight but ok. We waited to start and when we got to the deice line we shut down. I made it work and then kept asking for short cuts. It all worked out but had I said no, his tone told me there was going to be a resistance. In the end we landed over min fuel so no issues but the gray area was black and white for him. I did make 2 non-revs happy though.
Reply
Old 03-08-2025 | 05:39 PM
  #40  
Line Holder
10M Airline Miles
5 Years
100 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 57
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
I requested extra fuel for deice the other day and was told they can't because we were payload optimised. I didn't push the issue because I figured it would be tight but ok. We waited to start and when we got to the deice line we shut down. I made it work and then kept asking for short cuts. It all worked out but had I said no, his tone told me there was going to be a resistance. In the end we landed over min fuel so no issues but the gray area was black and white for him. I did make 2 non-revs happy though.
”Payload optimized” LOL. In a case like that, simply telling him that he will have to remove a bit of payload because safety trumps revenue, is the proper course of action, IMO.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DLax85
FedEx
5
06-23-2018 07:54 PM
dashtrash300
Aviation Law
8
08-31-2009 06:53 AM
Sir James
Major
0
04-13-2005 10:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices