Search

Notices

Economy 2.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2025 | 02:36 PM
  #61  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 668
Likes: 1
Default

Futures already down another 4% for Monday..
Old 04-06-2025 | 02:40 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 628
Default

Originally Posted by saltbae
Futures already down another 4% for Monday..
Good. This drives down inflation. The printing presses over the last 76 years needed to be tamed.

Oil is down too. 😁
Old 04-06-2025 | 02:43 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 628
Default

Originally Posted by cornerpocket
Not surprisingly, short on specifics and the countries are not named. If this were a game of poker, I’d call a bluff.
It's over a hundred now. Use your Google-fu, it's not hard to find

Christine Lagarde is ready to talk, she said so Friday. Her statement is readily available. Let you fingers do the walking.
Old 04-06-2025 | 02:48 PM
  #64  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2023
Posts: 319
Likes: 55
From: Former Hooterville
Default

Originally Posted by StoneQOLdCrazy
So the younger pilots who a couple months ago were being shaded for having "perfect" careers may in fact have to weather some bad times?
I have never met anyone with the my level of critical thinking. This means my opinions often times go against the grain.

That being said:

The country added jobs

50 countries have asked for expedited tariff negotiations

Domestic demand (except DCA) is still quite high, most foreigners don’t fly our metal anyways. It’s easier to just send pax to AMS and let them take care of the balance.

There is still a plane shortage, parking 757s would just mean furloughing and having to retrain at a later date. It would reduce substantial lift and KILL a quick recovery when this thing flashes over.

Furloughs and displacements can take 9 months, recovery takes 18 months. We are retiring 500 a year, that’s 1500 over the same time period.

Our fleet mix doesn’t make MDs efficient. We have the most diverse fleet.

How long can other countries hang onto tariffs vs the USA? Here is a hint. How many countries have trade ports on both coasts, two major oceans, a rail and highways system, colleges, energy, metals, skilled labor, education opportunities, clean air, clean water, food and an undefeated Navy to protect all that and enforce trade on the open seas? You know the answer. Trust me, most of these countries are screaming behind closed doors trying to asses how long they can economically hang on and how to exit this dilemma while saving their political butts.

My .02, you’ll be ok. You could end up stuck for a while, but not 99% system seniority for half a decade.

I think you are good to go.

Now if nukes go off in Iran and NK, AND China goes after Taiwan AND the US steps in AND Russia decides to slaughter themselves in Poland, you might end up flying CRAF as half your classmates and everyone retired with the past five years will get recalled.

Old 04-06-2025 | 02:58 PM
  #65  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 101
From: 787 FO
Default

Originally Posted by CrazyEight
I have never met anyone with the my level of critical thinking. This means my opinions often times go against the grain. That being said: The country added jobs
Did your critical thinking include when those jobs were added in relation to the start of tariffs and federal layoffs?
Old 04-06-2025 | 03:04 PM
  #66  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 625
Likes: 154
Default

Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
They have, we told the world no longer will they be allowed to have unfettered access to our economy where they on the other hand restrict our goods from theirs. This game has played itself out. I welcome the change. Wasn't long ago (circa 1996, 2008) many where calling for what was just implemented. You'd be surprised at some of the names.

So far over 100 nations have come back to make deals with us, great! Trade is good, fair trade even better. It was time for a reset and Im glad we finally hit that button.
It is funny to see the right wing tell me how good it is that the stock market is tanking.

6 months ago it was a different story.

At least be consistent (royal you, I have no idea what you're story is)
Old 04-06-2025 | 03:07 PM
  #67  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 625
Likes: 154
Default

Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
Canada, lol, a real economic powerhouse there.

Did you happen to catch Christine Lagarde's comments on Friday? She's ready to talk trade with us. Amazing isn't it.

I apologize for not talking about the AE. I'll refrain from further derail.
I'm not so quick to stick it to allies who have died beside my brothers.

It's a major difference between you (and yours) and me.
Old 04-06-2025 | 03:10 PM
  #68  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
Good. This drives down inflation. The printing presses over the last 76 years needed to be tamed.

Oil is down too. 😁
no, blanket tariffs do not drive down inflation
Old 04-06-2025 | 03:19 PM
  #69  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2023
Posts: 319
Likes: 55
From: Former Hooterville
Default

Originally Posted by demon llama
It is funny to see the right wing tell me how good it is that the stock market is tanking.

6 months ago it was a different story.

At least be consistent (royal you, I have no idea what you're story is)
And it tanked after 9/11 for 56 days. What time frame are we looking at? Pull up every correction since .com bust. Sure NASDAQ took a decade, but everything else just goes up. People don’t have pensions, anyone remotely considering retirement is buying a business, equities or real estate. Companies and real estate is still expensive, that leaves equities.

What direction can the market move when people start piling in at 5000? Sure the hedges finally made money on a short position, but they’ll be the ones buying at the top after retail, State Street, Blackrock and Vanguard kick it back up to 6000.

DYODD

I’m actually considering leverage if we go below 5000. Buy wonderful companies at a discount.
Old 04-06-2025 | 03:26 PM
  #70  
DeltaboundRedux's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 140
From: Enoch Powell Enthusiast
Default

Originally Posted by demon llama
I'm not so quick to stick it to allies who have died beside my brothers.

It's a major difference between you (and yours) and me.
Canada had the 3rd largest Navy in WWII and it's expeditionary ground forces were large enough to warrant their own beach on D-Day.

Their military contributions to Gulf War I and Gulf War II were considerably less enthusiastic.

"What have you done for me lately?" isn't kind, but it's not unfair to say that the miltary alliance of the US and Canada (visa va the former British Empire/Commonwealth), under whatever rubric/treaty/understanding you'd care to mention, definitely would suggest that the US does the heavy lifting. Rightly or wrongly.

It's not 1945, of course. But modern Canada is richer and has more men (3x more +) and GDP (12x more) to feed into the meat grinder in 2025 vs 1945; it chooses not to.

It's not unfair to notice it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gzsg
Delta
102
08-29-2017 05:12 PM
SNA320
United
30
09-03-2011 10:23 AM
vagabond
Money Talk
5
06-22-2007 11:22 AM
Ellen
Regional
13
04-28-2007 10:41 PM
Rjetdrivr
Money Talk
0
06-02-2006 10:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices