Originally Posted by notEnuf

Just the fact that you have to catch it and you have to file a second look case is by design, and intentional wage theft. When systems need adjustment for the company benefit they are done with haste like the PB calculator. Also the investigations into PB awards and the attempted theft of those involved a dedicated effort on behalf of the company. The fact that the automation is not yet implemented is intentional as well as the lack of effort to get things correct during the extended process. There is an intentional delay to drag this into the next section 6 negotiation as a grievance to diminish the value of the PWA and use this sticking point (and others) to lengthen the PWA negotiation and timeline for a new amended agreement. This cycle has played out time and time again and the company sees it as a way to save money and lengthen the duration of the current PWA with no hourly rate adjustment upon amendability. People don't want to see this and that ALPA doesn't communicate the real efforts of management which have played out in every negotiation well enough for "new" pilots. The rapid growth of the last few years has made us vulnerable to these tactics because the institutional knowledge has been reduced and the education through experience hasn't occurred for the more junior folks who haven't been through multiple contract cycles. SCOPE rewrite was the grieved sticking point years ago, last cycle was Covid, this cycle will be pay and QOL implementation. They always find or luck into external events to drag it out. To restate :

YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE TO DO ALL THE EXTRA EFFORT TO BE PAID CORRECTLY.

THE FACT THAT SOME PILOTS DON'T PUT IN THE TIME AND EFFORT TO AUDIT THOROUGHLY SAVES THE COMPANY MONEY AND IS THEFT AND THIS IS INTENTIONAL.

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44

I don’t even know how to read a PAS statement. I’m probably getting reroute pay at the lower rate, but I don’t even know how to verify it. The hourly rate difference is only a dollar.

Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo;[url=tel:3942472

3942472[/url]]As Not Enuf said, we shouldn't have to do forensic accounting on our pay every month. This is wage theft, and I'm very disappointed at the inaction of DALPA on this.

Originally Posted by TALPAtalker

The lapppplll to a non-traditional venue for resolution. I believe going on behind the scenes that we don’t yet know about.

Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo

I don't do "podcasts" but I do read my union emails

Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo

I don't do "podcasts" but I do read my union emails

Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo

I don't do "podcasts" but I do read my union emails

Originally Posted by Viper25

The MEC Chair went on to the podcast and he said things that aren’t in any Union emails. Big things. You may want to open your aperture of information beyond emails if you want the full picture for being informed.

Originally Posted by BlueSkies

I can't figure this out. Is podcasts in quotes because you think this one is not a real podcast or you just don't like all podcasts? It's just on-demand long form radio. Podcasts have made my commute much, much more tolerable.

Originally Posted by TALPAtalker

The last podcast episode implied that DALPA is working on a large case to take to a non-traditional venue for resolution. I believe there is a lot going on behind the scenes that we don’t yet know about.