200% for all reroutes

Reply Subscribe

Page 1 of 50

Last »

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

07-01-2025 | 02:10 PM

3 green

Thread Starter

Line Holder

Joined: Apr 2014

Posts: 1,142

Likes: 5

200% for all reroutes

Mgmt is making so much in cash savings from illegal reroutes they have chosen not to make it transparent as agreed upon. Now reroutes pay 200%. Are they complying with the 200% since June 2nd? The C44 email was probably and eye opener for some, but common knowledge to others. It's shocking how mgmt has been violating our PWA and they don't even care. I recommend everyone read the email that was sent out today by C44.

07-01-2025 | 02:56 PM

igotgummed

Line Holder

Joined: Jan 2020

Posts: 609

Likes: 120

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3 green

You’re right…..this isn’t the first comm about this. But as is the case around here…..many pilots don’t read ALPA comm.

Nice letter 44!!!!! That’s probably the strongest 44 comm I’ve ever read.

07-01-2025 | 03:03 PM

Abouttime2fish

Line Holder

Joined: Jul 2014

Posts: 1,920

Likes: 177

From: MD88

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3 green

I was not paid the 200% in my June reroute. Heck it took 2 tries just to get the 50%/100% correct. I did point out the settlement, and it was ignored. STS was submitted.

07-01-2025 | 03:28 PM

3 green

Thread Starter

Line Holder

Joined: Apr 2014

Posts: 1,142

Likes: 5

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abouttime2fish

I was not paid the 200% in my June reroute. Heck it took 2 tries just to get the 50%/100% correct. I did point out the settlement, and it was ignored. STS was submitted.

Mgmt probably figures over 50% of the pilots won't even submit an STS for the extra pay and they will save some money. That's the way they are handling all the over PWA violations. At some point something has to change, we can't keep allowing them to steal from us.

07-01-2025 | 05:07 PM

FangsF15

Moderator

Joined: Sep 2011

Posts: 8,352

Likes: 1,374

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3 green

FYSA, reports on FB are that Pay Inquiries are being closed without action, stating the company is in compliance.

Agree with the tone of C44’s email as being strongest I’ve seen. Shots fired!!!

07-01-2025 | 05:27 PM

Gone Flying

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Sep 2015

Posts: 5,578

Likes: 237

From: UNA

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abouttime2fish

I was not paid the 200% in my June reroute. Heck it took 2 tries just to get the 50%/100% correct. I did point out the settlement, and it was ignored. STS was submitted.

how would we know if we are paid the correct amount before the PAS comes out? I was rerouted this month and (L.4 but not L.8)

should the RRPY line show 200% of the value?

07-01-2025 | 05:37 PM

saltbae

Banned

Joined: Feb 2020

Posts: 668

Likes: 1

Quote:

Originally Posted by FangsF15

FYSA, reports on FB are that Pay Inquiries are being closed without action, stating the company is in compliance.

Agree with the tone of C44’s email as being strongest I’ve seen. Shots fired!!!

crew assist told me the they have not been directed to pay 23-10 Grievance for reroutes paying 100%

07-01-2025 | 07:55 PM

dmhpilot

Line Holder

Joined: Feb 2024

Posts: 393

Likes: 76

Quote:

Originally Posted by FangsF15

FYSA, reports on FB are that Pay Inquiries are being closed without action, stating the company is in compliance.

Agree with the tone of C44’s email as being strongest I’ve seen. Shots fired!!!

They closed all 6 of my crew assist cases that explicitly stated the reroute pay was incorrect per the settlement and contract awareness bulletin (4 reroutes after March 31, 2 after Jun 02) with “23-10 inquiry. No adjustment needed.”

07-01-2025 | 08:08 PM

saltbae

Banned

Joined: Feb 2020

Posts: 668

Likes: 1

Quote:

Originally Posted by dmhpilot

Yeah I’m leaving my hat at home.. tired of the games and management ignoring the contract

07-01-2025 | 09:21 PM

#10

Avgeek7248

What's a weekend?

Joined: Dec 2017

Posts: 709

Likes: 78

From: Widget FO

Quote:

Originally Posted by saltbae

Yeah I’m leaving my hat at home.. tired of the games and management ignoring the contract

Agreed. Clearly there needs to be a louder message sent then councils emails that only some of the group reads. It’s clearly wage theft. The intention is clear to me. FUPM.