200% for all reroutes
#11
The key, though, is you have stopped the clock. You only have 120 days to identify PWA violations. While a ‘class action’ type settlement may come on an issue like this, it is not a waste of your time to get into the record that they owe you.
#13
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 18
18. B. 2. Exception one: “The 120-day limit does not apply to claims for adjustment arising out of bookkeeping errors.”
Contract has 200% reroute pay codified since automation is not in place, ergo it’s a bookkeeping error now. This is the same logic behind not being able to simply pull down the M7 agreement to get batch sizes back versus grieving the grievance.
That said, submitting a Crew Assist makes work for the company so…
#14
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 5
I think this the main reason mgmt is violating the PWA so much. An arbitrator or class action settlement will result in a huge savings for Delta. Look at past settlements, Delta ends up paying a fraction of what they have stolen from us. Mgmt is just waiting for the settlement that could take place months from now. In the meantime, they are saving millions violating the PWA. I also think most PWA violations are never known about by pilots, and it saves Delta even more money when this happens.
#15
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 18
reroute pay is not subject to the 120 day clock.
18. B. 2. Exception one: “The 120-day limit does not apply to claims for adjustment arising out of bookkeeping errors.”
Contract has 200% reroute pay codified since automation is not in place, ergo it’s a bookkeeping error now. This is the same logic behind not being able to simply pull down the M7 agreement to get batch sizes back versus grieving the grievance.
That said, submitting a Crew Assist makes work for the company so…
18. B. 2. Exception one: “The 120-day limit does not apply to claims for adjustment arising out of bookkeeping errors.”
Contract has 200% reroute pay codified since automation is not in place, ergo it’s a bookkeeping error now. This is the same logic behind not being able to simply pull down the M7 agreement to get batch sizes back versus grieving the grievance.
That said, submitting a Crew Assist makes work for the company so…
If you want to stop the clock for a reroute pay under the settlement, you will need to file a crew assist claim. That being said, I would expect that an MEC grievance will be filed by the deadline that will stop the clock for all pilots.
#16
Can’t find crew pickup
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,075
Likes: 223
The company disagreeing with the terms of a settlement is not a bookkeeping error. Those are limited to things like calculations being wrong on a check, or the payroll system provider messing something up that was correct on your time card.
If you want to stop the clock for a reroute pay under the settlement, you will need to file a crew assist claim. That being said, I would expect that an MEC grievance will be filed by the deadline that will stop the clock for all pilots.
If you want to stop the clock for a reroute pay under the settlement, you will need to file a crew assist claim. That being said, I would expect that an MEC grievance will be filed by the deadline that will stop the clock for all pilots.
That being said I’d never PTT with what the company is doing.
#17
Quite a strongly worded letter, especially from 44. I was RR’ed twice in June. The second occurrence does not contain the addition 200%. Just sent another report via crew assist. .
I start a trip in a couple days. If the $$ doesn’t show up by then my hat will be staying home.
I start a trip in a couple days. If the $$ doesn’t show up by then my hat will be staying home.
#19
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 610
Likes: 122
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




