Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad (Post 3930985)

FAs too. Just don’t make the headlines nearly as heavy when it’s them.

Originally Posted by Opsmgrguy (Post 3931041)

I haven’t logged in here in years but I had to for this…..

False positive.

She was removed by authorities so there was no choice but to take action on the flight.

Multiple tests. Multiple negatives.

She was held an insanely long time and released.

False positive.

But the damage is done thanks to then “news”.

Originally Posted by saltbae (Post 3931064)

sooo she’s getting a big pay day from someone

Originally Posted by Gone Flying (Post 3931066)

from who?

I can’t imagine DL would be at fault

i imagine their cops have something similar to QI which renders them immune to lawsuits. Even if they don’t, they probably have laws set up to shield them from lawsuits. The fact they didn’t identify her will probably be enough to keep them from having any liability

the press didn’t report anything that was not made public by the police.

its terrible what happened to her but odds are she is SOL on getting any kind of meaningful payment for having her reputation trashed.

Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 3931149)

Glad to hear, she's good with job/career.



In Sweden? I doubt it. Most especially if the offender is a person of governance.

Originally Posted by cencal83406 (Post 3931166)

Any particular reason you’d assume you can’t get compensated for a government action shown to have been harmful and incorrect?

Originally Posted by saltbae (Post 3931168)

police departments paying millions in settlements every day to victims

Originally Posted by nene (Post 3931139)

According to Hunter (recent expert on subject), alcohol is more problematic addiction than crack cocaine.

Originally Posted by FL370esq (Post 3931169)

Overseas?? Heck, it's pretty hard to file litigation in Canada and Sweden leans a bit more progressive than our neighbors to the north.

Originally Posted by METO Guido (Post 3931128)

Excellent. Now take nine steps, heel-to-toe, along a straight line, turn on one foot and return nine steps in the opposite direction. A subject may be impaired if they:

• Begin before the instructions are finished
• Cannot keep balance while listening to the instructions
• Do not touch heel-to-toe
• Lose balance while turning
• Stop while walking to regain balance
• Take an incorrect number of steps
• Use arms to balance

Originally Posted by saltbae (Post 3931163)

I would sue the brakes off that company that makes faulty equipment, the police for not properly calibrating the breathalyzer… there’s negligence there.. ruined her name and possibly career