Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Does this mean we can take deliveries again? >

Does this mean we can take deliveries again?

Search

Notices

Does this mean we can take deliveries again?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-2025 | 02:18 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Air Force
Line Holder
200 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 58
Default

Originally Posted by Meme In Command
The July 320 newsletter shows 6 NEOs in storage. Only specifies 2 of them as lay flats and are the only 2 without an expect return to service date.
Aren't a few of those missing engines anyway?
Reply
Old 07-29-2025 | 03:09 AM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 481
Likes: 13
Default

From a month ago.

https://bsky.app/profile/xjonnyc.bsk.../3lsjnywrwzk2q

​​​​​​​
Reply
Old 07-29-2025 | 04:49 AM
  #13  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 813
Likes: 27
From: Wind checker
Default

This mornings WSJ on page A6 has the reciprocal trade carveout reinstated for both Boeing and Airbus mutually as a result of the US-EU trade deal. Let the Airbii flow….
Reply
Old 07-29-2025 | 07:10 AM
  #14  
crazyjaydawg's Avatar
Line Holder
10M Airline Miles
15 Years
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 34
From: Middle Seat
Default

Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
I thought these were the flatbed birds that the FAA hasn't certified the suites for.

*** And on this topic why is taking so long to say yay or nay? I know, I know, the FAA. But still..
The layflats failed testing…again. New EIS is TBD.

The team in charge of aircraft interiors has to be among the most egregiously incompetent at the air line.

777 refurb mess (then the pseudo cargo transformation prior to parking them for good)
764 D1 suites mess
717 new seats not meeting compliance (back to drawing board)
A350s without gasper vents
A321 CEOs with small overhead bins
A321 NEOs with granite seat cushions in FC that are already being replaced/ W&B issues.
A321 layflats with a vendor that hasn’t made them before

The list goes on and on. I’m sure I’m missing many others.

But at least they took the time to put together a shameless dnet article a couple years ago defending how tough their job is.
Reply
Old 07-29-2025 | 07:15 AM
  #15  
crewdawg's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,413
Likes: 413
Default

Originally Posted by crazyjaydawg
But at least they took the time to put together a shameless dnet article a couple years ago defending how tough their job is.
Is it them or the bosses above that won't give them the budget?

Last edited by crewdawg; 07-29-2025 at 07:53 AM.
Reply
Old 07-29-2025 | 07:51 AM
  #16  
Tinpusher007's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 20
From: 330 B
Default

Originally Posted by crazyjaydawg
The layflats failed testing…again. New EIS is TBD.

The team in charge of aircraft interiors has to be among the most egregiously incompetent at the air line.

777 refurb mess (then the pseudo cargo transformation prior to parking them for good)
764 D1 suites mess
717 new seats not meeting compliance (back to drawing board)
A350s without gasper vents
A321 CEOs with small overhead bins
A321 NEOs with granite seat cushions in FC that are already being replaced/ W&B issues.
A321 layflats with a vendor that hasn’t made them before

The list goes on and on. I’m sure I’m missing many others.

But at least they took the time to put together a shameless dnet article a couple years ago defending how tough their job is.
Imagine if aircraft seat MFRs had to get their products approved by the FAA and their counterparts around the world before they could be sold to the airlines...
Reply
Old 07-29-2025 | 07:56 AM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 241
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by crazyjaydawg
The layflats failed testing…again. New EIS is TBD.

The team in charge of aircraft interiors has to be among the most egregiously incompetent at the air line.

777 refurb mess (then the pseudo cargo transformation prior to parking them for good)
764 D1 suites mess
717 new seats not meeting compliance (back to drawing board)
A350s without gasper vents
A321 CEOs with small overhead bins
A321 NEOs with granite seat cushions in FC that are already being replaced/ W&B issues.
A321 layflats with a vendor that hasn’t made them before

The list goes on and on. I’m sure I’m missing many others.

But at least they took the time to put together a shameless dnet article a couple years ago defending how tough their job is.
Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
Imagine if aircraft seat MFRs had to get their products approved by the FAA and their counterparts around the world before they could be sold to the airlines...
Delta's investments might be questionable but AA has brand-new A321XLRs and 787s sitting uselessly in storage, not because of market issues, but because they failed spectacularly to get seats manufactured in time. This isn't just an interior design hiccup; it's crippling their already deficient widebody fleet, directly impacting their ability to compete and grow internationally. A strategic disaster.
Reply
Old 07-29-2025 | 11:13 AM
  #18  
GogglesPisano's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
20M Airline Miles
10 Years
Gets Weekends Off
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 6,536
Likes: 279
From: Sitting SC at the Five Towns
Default

Originally Posted by crazyjaydawg
764 D1 suites mess
I've used them, they seem pretty comfy. What's the issue?

Originally Posted by crazyjaydawg
A350s without gasper vents
I'm fairly certain that's a manufacturer issue. It may be an option, but a customer cannot retrofit after delivery as it's fairly deep in the AC and pressurization plumbing.
Reply
Old 07-29-2025 | 12:48 PM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 153
From: 787 FO
Default

Originally Posted by crazyjaydawg
A350s without gasper vents
UA 764s don't have gaspers either. Very strange.

What percentage of Delta wide bodies have Delta One Suites?
Reply
Old 08-03-2025 | 08:53 PM
  #20  
crazyjaydawg's Avatar
Line Holder
10M Airline Miles
15 Years
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 34
From: Middle Seat
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
I've used them, they seem pretty comfy. What's the issue?
The 764 seats are comfy, but they were originally designed to be full suites with a full closing door. Again a contract was signed with the cheapest bidder that hadn’t actually achieved certification yet and the FAA came back and said no, that design isn’t allowed. The 764 refurb went 2 years longer than planned mostly due to that.

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
I'm fairly certain that's a manufacturer issue. It may be an option, but a customer cannot retrofit after delivery as it's fairly deep in the AC and pressurization plumbing.
Nope it’s a customer configuration regarding placement of overhead bins (or lack thereof). The gaspers are a pretty simple hookup, but again requires a competent design.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SaltyDog
Major
46
06-04-2008 09:44 PM
CRJAV8OR
Cargo
11
04-03-2008 04:46 PM
Freightbird
Cargo
9
04-26-2007 04:31 AM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
4
06-17-2006 11:39 PM
Gman
JetBlue
29
03-15-2006 05:26 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices