Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Union efforts during shutdown >

Union efforts during shutdown

Search

Notices

Union efforts during shutdown

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-20-2025 | 11:20 AM
  #51  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2023
Posts: 319
Likes: 55
From: Former Hooterville
Default

Originally Posted by CX500T
There is nowhere near enough military controllers, and most of them won't have the quals needed to start up right now.

-Former XO of Navy ATC Unit
100%. Go from running military airfields to Lvl 14 facilities? Not a chance in ATL.
Reply
Old 10-20-2025 | 11:21 AM
  #52  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2023
Posts: 319
Likes: 55
From: Former Hooterville
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Can you imagine the fallout if the DCA crash happened during a shut down?
It would've been pretty wild.
Reply
Old 10-20-2025 | 01:03 PM
  #53  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 314
Likes: 30
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
1980's tech and procedures were cutting edge... in the 1980s. You know why we got $12B to modernize, right? Ain't nobody stepping into this mess without lotta train'n.
STARS, ERAM, SWIM and other deployed tech would like to talk to you about what is 1980s vs modern.
Reply
Old 10-20-2025 | 05:14 PM
  #54  
DeltaboundRedux's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 140
From: Enoch Powell Enthusiast
Default

Originally Posted by Khantahr
The TSA might be the ones who end this shutdown for us. While firing ATC for calling in sick might be illegal (not that that would stop them), they can replace them with military controllers right away.

They can't replace the TSA overnight, so they can't really fire them either.
Pretty much. While the TSA are unskilled labor (more or less), area controllers take about 2 years to train to FPL (Full Performance Level) status in their areas. Military controllers would be a natural replacement for civilian ATC controllers, but there is a steep learning curve going from landing planes on a carrier or land based military airfield to an extremely complex national airspace system funneling thousands of planes into an area with multiple airfields (Chicago, NYC, Dallas).(*)

The average area controller takes about 2 years to train. "Collision Course: Ronald Reagan, the Air Traffic Controllers, and the Strike that Changed America" covers this. Ground/field ATC operations are complex, but the real hang-up is the cruise-to-approach handoff.

The TSA is a much more immediate bottleneck, and not easily replaceable.

Practically, putting the National Guard in for TSA duties might be an actual improvement. But politically it would be a disaster. I would absolutely hate it.

Shutdowns have been done often enough to have their own rhythm. This will come and go, then be back again in 2-5-7 years.

(*)- Best analogy I've read is a Mark Twain saying about how paddlewheel captains were experts for their segment of the river but useless elsewhere.
Reply
Old 10-20-2025 | 05:37 PM
  #55  
Podracer's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 143
Likes: 63
Default

If you want to end this BS, ALPA should support ATC walking off the job. If they fire a controller, have ALPA walk us off the job as well. We would have a budget tomorrow afternoon and they would change the law allowing for continuation of government, taking this move off the chess table for good. I am not a fan of playing with people's livelihoods for politics of all things. On a current trajectory, ATC is understaffed and still running 24/7 ops so airlines can get paid to repositions flights on a redeye for more profitable AM launches. Controllers are working understaffed, and now sick so they don't get fired. If ALPA is about safety, this is the time to act. This is not about a work action, this is about upsetting an accident chain in the making.

EDIT: We would be the a-holes for those travelling over a few days, but the industry would be the heroes, the Robinhood, of ending this technique that only hurts people already struggling to get by.
This is basically exactly what the FAs did the last shutdown. When they can't arrest or fire you all, it doesn't matter.
It's sad that FAs will do it, but pilots will not.
Reply
Old 11-04-2025 | 07:15 AM
  #56  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2023
Posts: 319
Likes: 55
From: Former Hooterville
Default

Originally Posted by CrazyEight
We all are very familiar with the mechanisms used to nudge Congress towards ending the last shutdown. The media, corporate America and politicians have effectively blacked out that mechanism because it is inherently very effective and has the ability to completely render them powerless, just envision them having to drive home like a everyday people.

Duffy has threatened to fire any controller calling out sick during the shutdown. Furthermore, the Taft-Harley Act prohibits strikes amongst private-sector employees if it could cause a national emergency... So restrictions on strikes are not limited to just public servants as Reagan demonstrated, but everyday civilians as well. Not exactly what the framers of the Constitution had in mind.
Looks like Duffy has changed his position.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/he...1458e4a6&ei=10
Reply
Old 11-04-2025 | 11:50 AM
  #57  
MeteorA113's Avatar
On Reserve
On Reserve
10 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 127
Likes: 19
From: Boeing Necromancer
Default

Originally Posted by CrazyEight
Looks like Duffy has changed his position.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/he...1458e4a6&ei=10
Let him threaten it. It's not gonna end well for him, the Admin, or the legislation.
Reply
Old 11-05-2025 | 08:01 AM
  #58  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 254
Likes: 151
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
No. Like user fees paid to a non-profit corporation unencumbered by government acquisition bureaucracy. Like in Canada, UK, Germany, Australia and New Zealand.

Our controllers would be getting paid right now.
We pay a hefty user fee every time we buy 100LL. Please stop suggesting that we pay more when I already pay a hefty fee that is more than adequate for the minimal services/infrastructure we receive in return.
Reply
Old 11-05-2025 | 08:25 AM
  #59  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 625
Likes: 154
Default

Originally Posted by Freds Ex
We pay a hefty user fee every time we buy 100LL. Please stop suggesting that we pay more when I already pay a hefty fee that is more than adequate for the minimal services/infrastructure we receive in return.
Does 100LL still have lead in it?
Reply
Old 11-05-2025 | 08:31 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,362
Likes: 904
Default

Originally Posted by demon llama
Does 100LL still have lead in it?
Are they allowed to call it low lead without it containing the one thing that makes leaded fuel have its own designation?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boeing Aviator
United
109
10-07-2022 05:53 PM
beech1980
Part 135
1191
06-19-2022 05:02 PM
Want2BAtlasAv8r
Hiring News
121
06-15-2018 07:26 PM
Herkulesdrvr
Major
34
01-01-2009 10:58 AM
BoilerUP
Regional
9
09-01-2007 04:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices