View Poll Results: 2026 Profit Sharing Guess
Voters: 212. You may not vote on this poll
Profit Sharing 26 Rumors and Guesses
01-15-2026 | 05:40 PM
#111
Bent over by buybacks
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 542
The point should be, we have oodles of leverage just as we’re about to start contract negotiations.
01-15-2026 | 05:45 PM
#113
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,215
Likes: 662
From: ir.delta.com
01-15-2026 | 05:55 PM
#114
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
but you’ll instead play your silly “i’m super connected and know things you don’t know” game. color me unconvinced.
01-15-2026 | 06:00 PM
#115
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 3,372
Likes: 812
Are you saying the 23M7 payouts are undefeated 100m or not?
01-15-2026 | 06:28 PM
#117
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 306
I'll take the bait.
In no single month did 23M7 cause more than $100m in "extra" pilot pay versus if 23M7 had not been used and trips were covered by following the coverage ladder (i.e. not using 23M7.)
I'll double down by prophesizing that you, or someone (he whom should not be named) will spin the result in a way that doesn't fit these parameters.
In no single month did 23M7 cause more than $100m in "extra" pilot pay versus if 23M7 had not been used and trips were covered by following the coverage ladder (i.e. not using 23M7.)
I'll double down by prophesizing that you, or someone (he whom should not be named) will spin the result in a way that doesn't fit these parameters.
Last edited by Verdell; 01-15-2026 at 06:52 PM.
01-15-2026 | 10:40 PM
#118
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 381
Likes: 55
That call was interesting and ended up being a goodbye Glen feat. Curiously it was mentioned once and Ed made light of it as a PWA implementation issue. Our awareness of the operational problems is more than the investor community. They were not overly concerned because the numbers were in line and even a little better than the whisper. The other thing was no media questions (they never entered the que for questioning) which I have never seen before, so no public interest in the operational problems. We are making more of this than anyone else. The whole call was a little off to me.
01-16-2026 | 03:02 AM
#119
Moderator
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,209
Likes: 1,161
That call was interesting and ended up being a goodbye Glen feat. Curiously it was mentioned once and Ed made light of it as a PWA implementation issue. Our awareness of the operational problems is more than the investor community. They were not overly concerned because the numbers were in line and even a little better than the whisper. The other thing was no media questions (they never entered the que for questioning) which I have never seen before, so no public interest in the operational problems. We are making more of this than anyone else. The whole call was a little off to me.
It sort of feels like being in Michael Burry’s office during The Big Short, knowing we are in a position to make it rain, and wondering how nobody on the outside sees it. Except — we’ve been talking about it on a public forum for 6+ months, which makes it even more interesting. I would love to be a fly on the wall in ATL…
01-16-2026 | 08:26 AM
#120
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 3,372
Likes: 812
I'll take the bait.
In no single month did 23M7 cause more than $100m in "extra" pilot pay versus if 23M7 had not been used and trips were covered by following the coverage ladder (i.e. not using 23M7.)
I'll double down by prophesizing that you, or someone (he whom should not be named) will spin the result in a way that doesn't fit these parameters.
In no single month did 23M7 cause more than $100m in "extra" pilot pay versus if 23M7 had not been used and trips were covered by following the coverage ladder (i.e. not using 23M7.)
I'll double down by prophesizing that you, or someone (he whom should not be named) will spin the result in a way that doesn't fit these parameters.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
