Another one bites the dust

Reply Subscribe

Page 4 of 4

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

03-06-2026 | 07:43 AM

#31

ancman

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jul 2022

Posts: 2,294

Likes: 1,203

Quote:

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano

Honestly these abbreviations are ridiculous. These are all officers at a publicly-traded corporation. It's not the CIA.

Agreed. There’s no actual need (forum rules or otherwise) to abbreviate.

03-06-2026 | 08:17 AM

#32

Lerxst

Line Holder

Joined: Mar 2012

Posts: 735

Likes: 0

From: B787 CA - SFO

Quote:

Originally Posted by ancman

Agreed. There’s no actual need (forum rules or otherwise) to abbreviate.

“Excuse me, sir. Seeing as how the V.P. is such a V.I.P., shouldn’t we keep the P.C. on the Q.T.? ‘Cause of the leaks to the V.C. he could end up M.I.A., and then we’d all be put out in K.P.”

03-06-2026 | 09:37 AM

#33

Wolf424

Has a furrowed brow

Joined: Dec 2019

Posts: 1,438

Likes: 250

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lerxst

“What’s three up and three down mean to you?!”

”End of an inning?”

03-06-2026 | 03:41 PM

#34

Rvr330

On Reserve

Joined: Jul 2025

Posts: 49

Likes: 37

From: A350

Cannot wait till the day RG “retires” and sent back to the regionals. He has done more harm to the labor relationship than any of his predecessors.

03-07-2026 | 08:14 PM

#35

crazyjaydawg

Line Holder

Joined: Apr 2009

Posts: 1,286

Likes: 41

From: Middle Seat

Quote:

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano

Honestly these abbreviations are ridiculous. These are all officers at a publicly-traded corporation. It's not the CIA.

Thank you for saying this.

If someone has to publicly declare when they are “gifted” (awarded) stock, or buy or sell stock in the company then we don’t have to abbreviate their names.

If they’re some base chief or senior general manager of minions then sure, use a cover name; but Ed and the rest of the C-Suite literally live under a public microscope. It’s a big reason why they’re compensated how they are. A deal with the devil and all.