Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2012 | 04:25 PM
  #102271  
Jack Bauer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,357
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MrBojangles
How do you know we all won't get 7? We've mostly all been getting at least 5 or 6 a month lately in my category anyway (unless you are senior). The extra pay is nice, but again; I think the 7th SC should be optional like the ALV+15 thing.
When the staffing is even more lean (it hasn't been lean for some time due to "capacity restraint....parking airplanes) you will get called 7 times and you will get flown as much as they can legally fly you. Nobody should use what is happening now as a gauge for what will happen in the future.
Old 05-29-2012 | 04:26 PM
  #102272  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
Round and round we go....

The bottom line is there are more total large RJ's. That's the threat/problem which cannot be ignored regardless of semantics and shell games.

Large RJ's can do flying currently performed by Delta mainline due to their economics. But you already knew that from the hundreds of times this fact has been pointed out.

Doesn't affect me one way or the other dude... it's your captains seat you are putting on hold. You can't see the forest for the vitriol.
Old 05-29-2012 | 04:29 PM
  #102273  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
The 70 seaters are not under long term contract. Many of the 70 seat leases are up in 2015. There really isn't anything to stop a 1:1 trade with 70 seaters to 76 seatsrs.
Especially when it only takes about half the 717s to put us above the magic 767 mainline fleet requirement. 70s become 76s... and then there is ZERO protection against pump and dump... none.
Old 05-29-2012 | 04:30 PM
  #102274  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
OK Slowplay, Pineapple Guy or whatever management/ALPA stooge you happen to be....

I will overlook everything that tells me this will screw my career and permanently damage the plight of most Delta/Major airline pilots. Now I'm voting YES. Yay.

Screw the profession.

Screw our health and family life.

Screw any advancement for another ten years while we continue to shrink (do more with less pilots).

Screw it all all. As long as I get a few more beans. Maybe I can grow a bean stock and find riches at the top. That's a good career plan I think. It makes as much sense as you do.
Nothing like a well thought out argument to get your point across Jack.
Old 05-29-2012 | 04:35 PM
  #102275  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Um, the old DL limit was raised to incorporate the old NWA limit, notwithstanding the grievance settlement on the language that led to the current 255 cap. In fact, DL inherited the AS mess and the GW increase to accommodate CPZ's larger AC. It even went on to cover AC that weren't even being operated yet but were "on order".

If DL buys another airline with RJ feed, there is a 110% chance DALPA will settle for a higher limit at the very least prorated to the combined totals, unless another deal is reached to park 50's in exchange for even more 90's, which will be called the same victory this TA is being called WRT that.

It will be sold because of the "equity stake" and more small raises and maybe a few things here or there (back down to 6 sort calls?) followed by the promise to "get what we can now and "get em next time". We have got to start learning from history.
Fine. IF you want to base your vote on total conjecture (another merger that comes with RJ feed etc etc etc..) then by all means do so.
Let me suggest a movie that might help all with the seemingly endless inundation of paranoia. War Games. The only move is not to play. And with that in mind, vote no, and let's watch what happens. The sad thing is that most of you that are espousing that action FOR the reasons that you are advocating them will disappear from these boards... Vote whatever way you want, but I implore you to do so based on the facts and not the preconceived notions that I am reading here.
Old 05-29-2012 | 04:37 PM
  #102276  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Great points. We have over a month until TA voting closes. The reality is that you will need to constantly repeat yourself or save posts to use as responses for that month. The "yes" and "undecided" voters have an equal right to sell their position as a "no" vote does. Just argue the points.

You make good points, but many may stop reading if you get frustrated and mad. This is a fight of attrition.
He makes great points. Except he fails to recognize that we are not voting on Alaska's contract. I would like Albert Pujols contract better than any of these, but guess what....
Old 05-29-2012 | 04:41 PM
  #102277  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer
I'm sure DALPA could fly the 76ers for cheaper than Comair; unfortunately you'll need to compare your rates to GoJetsss since that's where the DCI growth is.

You miss the point. I used a 7 year guy just to illustrate about where the captain on that airplane might be in terms of seniority. And then I showed you exactly why that airplane will never be flown by a 7 year guy. I am not doing a dissertation, but thanks for the suggestion. My bottom line point is that there is absolutely no way those 76 seat airplanes can come here and be competitive.. none.

Wait a minute... are you saying that guys would fly that for $50/hour in the left seat??? Really????
Old 05-29-2012 | 04:47 PM
  #102278  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Especially when it only takes about half the 717s to put us above the magic 767 mainline fleet requirement. 70s become 76s... and then there is ZERO protection against pump and dump... none.
First, there is a natural protection against pump and dump. What kind of lessor or creditor is going to let you play that kind of a stupid game just to screw over your pilots? If they went down that road we have a lot more to worry about then scope.

Second, when does the company have to park 76 seaters under this TA?
Old 05-29-2012 | 04:51 PM
  #102279  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

................
Old 05-29-2012 | 04:54 PM
  #102280  
MrBojangles's Avatar
Line Holder
10 Years
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 643
Likes: 52
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
When the staffing is even more lean (it hasn't been lean for some time due to "capacity restraint....parking airplanes) you will get called 7 times and you will get flown as much as they can legally fly you. Nobody should use what is happening now as a gauge for what will happen in the future.

I concur. We don't know what will happen down the road, but we can put protections in the PWA to limit the damage that happens to us as pilots. Too bad this TA actually does the opposite.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices