Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
It's, um... unfortunately... a lot like this... How Female Arousal Overrides Their Disgust During Sex: Study
And we did it.‘Quite A Show’: Couple Caught On Camera Having Sex In Yankee Stadium Bathroom Stall « CBS New York
I am %100 certain that Clamp is a hell of a guy.
I think his problem is being told "Only we have all the facts, and even if we told you, which we won't, only we are smart enough to understand what's going on, so just vote yes, then sit in the corner, shut up and color".
Fortunately, that's a trait that many of us share, and we're not too shy about telling those who espouse that, um, particular philosophy, to bugger off.
I'm the nicest guy in the world, kind to old ladies and small animals alike, but don't **** on my head, and tell me it's raining.
Nu
I think his problem is being told "Only we have all the facts, and even if we told you, which we won't, only we are smart enough to understand what's going on, so just vote yes, then sit in the corner, shut up and color".
Fortunately, that's a trait that many of us share, and we're not too shy about telling those who espouse that, um, particular philosophy, to bugger off.
I'm the nicest guy in the world, kind to old ladies and small animals alike, but don't **** on my head, and tell me it's raining.
Nu
The things we do for entertainment while on short call... I guess it wasn't that mean because he wanted to go back in after I pulled it off from him. Anyhoo, spot on, Nu.
ALPA is a good and smart Master.
They gave 80ktsClamp a collar so he could talk.
They gave 80ktsClamp a collar so he could talk.
I am %100 certain that Clamp is a hell of a guy.
I think his problem is being told "Only we have all the facts, and even if we told you, which we won't, only we are smart enough to understand what's going on, so just vote yes, then sit in the corner, shut up and color".
Fortunately, that's a trait that many of us share, and we're not too shy about telling those who espouse that, um, particular philosophy, to bugger off.
I'm the nicest guy in the world, kind to old ladies and small animals alike, but don't **** on my head, and tell me it's raining.
Nu
I think his problem is being told "Only we have all the facts, and even if we told you, which we won't, only we are smart enough to understand what's going on, so just vote yes, then sit in the corner, shut up and color".
Fortunately, that's a trait that many of us share, and we're not too shy about telling those who espouse that, um, particular philosophy, to bugger off.
I'm the nicest guy in the world, kind to old ladies and small animals alike, but don't **** on my head, and tell me it's raining.
Nu
I'm sure clamp is great and does a fantastic job in person, I figure this is his "forum"
to blow off steam in anonymity.
That mindset is a bit disturbing.
Here is my thoughts, not necessarily a naysayer but rather ardent disagreement with what happened, I'll put it in picture form.
That's my two cents.
Here is the situation the company was in:
1) they had too many of these that they did not want...

2) they had jets they wanted but couldn't have because of us...

3) and they had these unwanted jets drop in their lap by a major competitor who never wanted them and were so desperate to get rid of them that they'd pay us to take them...
Ya'll all agree on those fundamentals?
Now you could believe that in order to afford the 717 we had to get rid of CRJ-200s but in order to do that we had to convince Bombardier to take them back and the only way to do that was to take CRJ-900s in exchange. That's fine. I hope you're right.
Or,
Like me, you sadly believe the company decided (smartly) to arouse us with 717s (all pure growth) in order to get us to swallow something we don't like (allowing more jumbo RJs). Toss in the idea of shrinking DCI to raise arousal, but, it seems that was happening without the TA anyways.
It's, um... unfortunately... a lot like this... How Female Arousal Overrides Their Disgust During Sex: Study
And we did it.
So all we have now is the hope that the new jumbo RJs that we ceded to the company come in exchange for mainline airframe growth even though that's no longer required. And sure those of us who said no to the TA could shut up and move on and forget about what happened with scope, but, some of us feel that we need to continue to raise awareness that the precedence and safeguards we set are insufficient if not unfavorable to us and we should not agree to anything like it again.
1) they had too many of these that they did not want...

2) they had jets they wanted but couldn't have because of us...

3) and they had these unwanted jets drop in their lap by a major competitor who never wanted them and were so desperate to get rid of them that they'd pay us to take them...
Ya'll all agree on those fundamentals?
Now you could believe that in order to afford the 717 we had to get rid of CRJ-200s but in order to do that we had to convince Bombardier to take them back and the only way to do that was to take CRJ-900s in exchange. That's fine. I hope you're right.
Or,
Like me, you sadly believe the company decided (smartly) to arouse us with 717s (all pure growth) in order to get us to swallow something we don't like (allowing more jumbo RJs). Toss in the idea of shrinking DCI to raise arousal, but, it seems that was happening without the TA anyways.
It's, um... unfortunately... a lot like this... How Female Arousal Overrides Their Disgust During Sex: Study
And we did it.
So all we have now is the hope that the new jumbo RJs that we ceded to the company come in exchange for mainline airframe growth even though that's no longer required. And sure those of us who said no to the TA could shut up and move on and forget about what happened with scope, but, some of us feel that we need to continue to raise awareness that the precedence and safeguards we set are insufficient if not unfavorable to us and we should not agree to anything like it again.
That's my two cents.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




