Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 09-24-2012 | 05:07 PM
  #111021  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hoserpilot
Slow, did you even read what I wrote? Fact, the Skywest pilots were suckered into dealing brad his ace. The planes were already ordered. We fell for the same tactic. Fact, I'm happy with my no vote AND I'm happy that the TA passed. Gee, how can that be? Maybe I'm not that far off in my beliefs with you? Opinion, you can't see that we gave up more than we should have in work rules. Fact, at my seniority im living with the work rule changes. Fact, anyone can cite what you posted above to support their cause. Good for you but some of that happened after the TA passed....I think. Fact, no one really knows what would've happened with a no vote. That's right, you don't know. Nice. Fact, it was delta management that told ALPA they had a plan B. ALPA then forwarded managements negotiating scare tactic on to the pilot group. ALPA actually helped management. Who needs Ford & Harrison as consultants when ALPA does all the work for them. I want to look at the TA and decide for myself. I don't need to be sold a TA. Oh yeah, fact, spirit turned down their deal, it got better.
I'm just glad they didn't mention the dreaded (insert DOM DOM DOMMMM! sound effect here), dare I say its name? Plan C...total and complete annihilation of the pilot group surely the end state.
Old 09-24-2012 | 05:08 PM
  #111022  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
blah blah blah.. no proof, all conjecture based on hope.

It's getting old.

so says you,

I have as much evidence that we'd have gotten a better contract as someone has that turning it down would've been worse.
Old 09-24-2012 | 05:17 PM
  #111023  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dalad
Let's just wait til the block hour plan for next year comes out in October.
Good advice. We haven't hit any points yet where the TA rationale has been debunked, nor validated.

I don't think I'm alone in detecting some back-pedalling by SD, and I'm also unconvinced by the arguments that the economy is turning against us more than it was already against us. I don't really see any new factors now that didn't exist in June, which might justify a change in the plan. In particular, I'm unimpressed with the European "surprise" argument. That's a little bit like saying we all agreed the train was derailing, but we weren't sure of how the fourth and fith cars would fare, and everything is different now that they're coming off the rails.

I also suspect that we're seeing a deliberate shift away from direct flights, and into feeding the JV hubs.

But for now, it's too early to draw lasting conclusions about the TA.
Old 09-24-2012 | 05:18 PM
  #111024  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

so if we merge with Hawaiian, how much capacity do we have to cut post merger?
Old 09-24-2012 | 05:22 PM
  #111025  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: Short Bus FO
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
so if we merge with Hawaiian, how much capacity do we have to cut post merger?

Probably only furlough up to about seniority #9000 or so.
Old 09-24-2012 | 05:25 PM
  #111026  
Jack Bauer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,357
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
Good advice. We haven't hit any points yet where the TA rationale has been debunked, nor validated.



I don't think I'm alone in detecting some back-pedalling by SD, and I'm also unconvinced by the arguments that the economy is turning against us more than it was already against us. I don't really see any new factors now that didn't exist in June, which might justify a change in the plan. In particular, I'm unimpressed with the European "surprise" argument. That's a little bit like saying we all agreed the train was derailing, but we weren't sure of how the fourth and fith cars would fare, and everything is different now that they're coming off the rails.

I also suspect that we're seeing a deliberate shift away from direct flights, and into feeding the JV hubs.

But for now, it's too early to draw lasting conclusions about the TA.
Not necessarily in this order but see any patterns emerging. Some will say whatever is necessary to get what they want. Some will believe what is said every time no matter how many times they get duped.

Delta tells Cinci we are here to stay and not shrinking if merger approved.

Merger is approved and we have only a few flights left now.



Delta tells Delta pilots we will get a bunch of increased flying if we lobby with them to get the slot swap for LGA.

We lobby/win and find out Delta forgot to tell us most of the new flying is DCI RJ’s


Delta tells MSP we are there to stay and will keep jobs in the area with training and some headquarters if merger approved (remember the questioning by then Transportation Committee Chairman James Oberstar).

Less than three years after the merger was approved most of the training and NWA headquarters moved to ATL (Delta did pay a monetary penalty for this as MSP dignitaries didn't trust the double talk and in the end they we smart to be skeptical and require penalties if Delta didn’t follow through on promises).


Delta/ALPA imply, hint, suggest hiring to begin by the end of 2012 if we pass TA2012. The ALPA marketing machine puts out bogus numbers for hiring if we vote in TA2012 that evaporate within a couple short months because of …..wait for it…..the economy that’s exactly the same as it was when such statements were made.


ALPA says we will not hurry the negotiations for TA2012 if it causes us to marginalize the goals of our pilot group as reflected in the TA2012 survey.

ALPA does a 180, abrogates its promises, keeps its membership in the dark and hard sells an inferior agreement that is sold as hiring positive (see above).


ALPA promises to release Flight Pay Loss data when put under pressure by its constituents.

ALPA fails to produce such numbers and by now have swept all this under the carpet.


And so on and so on and so on…….

Old 09-24-2012 | 05:31 PM
  #111027  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
They need to defend it because the same process is going to be used for the FT/DT spin when that LOA is floated.

Plus it's politically embarrassing when you spend a lot of time and effort trying to spin the fact that your work rules concessions arn't going to cause 300 surplus pilots, when it's pretty obvious that it will, and then have management come out and say "yea, the new rules gave us a 300 pilot surplus".

That complicates the spin control down the road.

We went from a big AE for the RMA, and when that didn't happen, it morphed into a little one followed by a "big one in October", which has now been downsized into "backfill and cleanup", and now we"re hearing that some categories are fat, and more displacements could be in the works.

How much more "good news" is on the way?
I thought it was fairly explicit that some items were concessionary, and I thought it was pretty clear that the initial staffing result was expected to be roughly neutral. I think it was also fairly explicit that, without letting them be tied to a number, the reps suggested there would be a need for a lot of pilots in the near future assuming the company can stick to the plan. I don't see new elements to justify a departure from the plan, but since we don't have deliveries until later next year, I don't think we can excited until we get into 2013.

Still, I agree with much of your post above, especially since I fear we might be unhappy with the FTDT results. I say this because we haven't been polled on what we might or might not be willing to trade for what might or might not be on the table. I'm also concerned that a very significant agreement, which the reps acknowledged would be an oportunity to further negotiate, might be implemented without MEMRAT. I have no info that this will be the case, so I might just be paranoid, but I don't have a great feeling about the FTDT outcome yet.

I'll be glad to be proven wrong, and I imagine you feel the same way?
Old 09-24-2012 | 05:49 PM
  #111028  
Boomer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 15
From: blueJet
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
...1. Since the TA, Delta has announced the shutdown of Comair, the retirement of 82 RJ-50's, and the acquisition of 88 B-717's. What does that picture look like absent a TA?
Alpha,

I don't think you want to provide any proof to the RJDC/DFR crowd. Lets just say Comair was hosed no matter which way DALPA voted on this TA.

You start taking credit for shutting down Comair, and you'll work up some of the 5%ers at my airline. Then one of my 5%ers gets one of your 5%ers all worked up, and pretty soon Boomer never gets a job anywhere ever again. Deal?
Old 09-24-2012 | 05:55 PM
  #111029  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: Short Bus FO
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
Not necessarily in this order but see any patterns emerging. Some will say whatever is necessary to get what they want. Some will believe what is said every time no matter how many times they get duped.

Delta tells Cinci we are here to stay and not shrinking if merger approved.

Merger is approved and we have only a few flights left now.



Delta tells Delta pilots we will get a bunch of increased flying if we lobby with them to get the slot swap for LGA.

We lobby/win and find out Delta forgot to tell us most of the new flying is DCI RJ’s


Delta tells MSP we are there to stay and will keep jobs in the area with training and some headquarters if merger approved (remember the questioning by then Transportation Committee Chairman James Oberstar).

Less than three years after the merger was approved most of the training and NWA headquarters moved to ATL (Delta did pay a monetary penalty for this as MSP dignitaries didn't trust the double talk and in the end they we smart to be skeptical and require penalties if Delta didn’t follow through on promises).


Delta/ALPA imply, hint, suggest hiring to begin by the end of 2012 if we pass TA2012. The ALPA marketing machine puts out bogus numbers for hiring if we vote in TA2012 that evaporate within a couple short months because of …..wait for it…..the economy that’s exactly the same as it was when such statements were made.


ALPA says we will not hurry the negotiations for TA2012 if it causes us to marginalize the goals of our pilot group as reflected in the TA2012 survey.

ALPA does a 180, abrogates its promises, keeps its membership in the dark and hard sells an inferior agreement that is sold as hiring positive (see above).


ALPA promises to release Flight Pay Loss data when put under pressure by its constituents.

ALPA fails to produce such numbers and by now have swept all this under the carpet.


And so on and so on and so on…….

Delta tells Memphis pilots that the base is "Here to stay" and less than two months later it's closed with a suprise AE and the pilots have 10 days from the announcement to decide on a bid and get it in for their new base.
Old 09-24-2012 | 06:05 PM
  #111030  
paxhauler85's Avatar
*********
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
Not necessarily in this order but see any patterns emerging. Some will say whatever is necessary to get what they want. Some will believe what is said every time no matter how many times they get duped.

Delta tells Cinci we are here to stay and not shrinking if merger approved.

Merger is approved and we have only a few flights left now.



Delta tells Delta pilots we will get a bunch of increased flying if we lobby with them to get the slot swap for LGA.

We lobby/win and find out Delta forgot to tell us most of the new flying is DCI RJ’s


Delta tells MSP we are there to stay and will keep jobs in the area with training and some headquarters if merger approved (remember the questioning by then Transportation Committee Chairman James Oberstar).

Less than three years after the merger was approved most of the training and NWA headquarters moved to ATL (Delta did pay a monetary penalty for this as MSP dignitaries didn't trust the double talk and in the end they we smart to be skeptical and require penalties if Delta didn’t follow through on promises).


Delta/ALPA imply, hint, suggest hiring to begin by the end of 2012 if we pass TA2012. The ALPA marketing machine puts out bogus numbers for hiring if we vote in TA2012 that evaporate within a couple short months because of …..wait for it…..the economy that’s exactly the same as it was when such statements were made.


ALPA says we will not hurry the negotiations for TA2012 if it causes us to marginalize the goals of our pilot group as reflected in the TA2012 survey.

ALPA does a 180, abrogates its promises, keeps its membership in the dark and hard sells an inferior agreement that is sold as hiring positive (see above).


ALPA promises to release Flight Pay Loss data when put under pressure by its constituents.

ALPA fails to produce such numbers and by now have swept all this under the carpet.


And so on and so on and so on…….

Anyone else find this upsetting? Always held the management team in high regard, but this makes me feel like my "dream job" is actually working for Ali Baba and the 40 thieves.

Disgraceful.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices