Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
09-25-2012, 06:10 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B737 CA
Posts: 1,518
So any APC'ers headed down to the BVIs for the Interline Regatta in a couple weeks?
09-25-2012, 06:14 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: Middle Seat
Posts: 1,213
09-25-2012, 06:33 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,534
The point is they will argue for category relative and sue for DFR if they don't get it. Every new hire class they run can move most HI pilots up about a thousand or so numbers (depending on class size of course) if relative seniority ends up having anything to do with it. Also, every time they run a new hire class, the new hires in the class senior to them instantly slot in with 2001-2007 hires. Again, if relative is the model. And rest assured they will fight for it and sue if they don't get it.
09-25-2012, 06:43 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
The point is they will argue for category relative and sue for DFR if they don't get it. Every new hire class they run can move most HI pilots up about a thousand or so numbers (depending on class size of course) if relative seniority ends up having anything to do with it. Also, every time they run a new hire class, the new hires in the class senior to them instantly slot in with 2001-2007 hires. Again, if relative is the model. And rest assured they will fight for it and sue if they don't get it.
09-25-2012, 06:47 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Capt
Posts: 2,041
The point is they will argue for category relative and sue for DFR if they don't get it. Every new hire class they run can move most HI pilots up about a thousand or so numbers (depending on class size of course) if relative seniority ends up having anything to do with it. Also, every time they run a new hire class, the new hires in the class senior to them instantly slot in with 2001-2007 hires. Again, if relative is the model. And rest assured they will fight for it and sue if they don't get it.
09-25-2012, 06:51 PM
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Sorry, I thought about this and looked in the contract. If we merge with HAL and a 2012 hire is placed in with say a 1998 hire, just an example, their seniority might have them with those hired in 98 but their longevity for pay purposes would be based on 2012, right?
I never thought about this before but as far as I can tell longevity is based on date of employment as a pilot. So 2012? So while we don't currently have any < 12 year pilots on the 330, we could very soon have some. Maybe even < 12 year 7ER As? I understand that despite what APC shows on its page they do have some junior 767 As?
I never thought about this before but as far as I can tell longevity is based on date of employment as a pilot. So 2012? So while we don't currently have any < 12 year pilots on the 330, we could very soon have some. Maybe even < 12 year 7ER As? I understand that despite what APC shows on its page they do have some junior 767 As?
09-25-2012, 06:56 PM
Runs with scissors
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,728
Sorry, I thought about this and looked in the contract. If we merge with HAL and a 2012 hire is placed in with say a 1998 hire, just an example, their seniority might have them with those hired in 98 but their longevity for pay purposes would be based on 2012, right?
I never thought about this before but as far as I can tell longevity is based on date of employment as a pilot. So 2012?
I never thought about this before but as far as I can tell longevity is based on date of employment as a pilot. So 2012?
Your seniority number is not based on date of hire.
09-25-2012, 07:01 PM
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
The point is they will argue for category relative and sue for DFR if they don't get it. Every new hire class they run can move most HI pilots up about a thousand or so numbers (depending on class size of course) if relative seniority ends up having anything to do with it. Also, every time they run a new hire class, the new hires in the class senior to them instantly slot in with 2001-2007 hires. Again, if relative is the model. And rest assured they will fight for it and sue if they don't get it.
The fences come down and they can say "hmmm... senior 744B or senior 777B? Well, shucks, I've only been here three years. Maybe I should take a Captain slot... +717!!!!!!!!!!!"Carl is laughing.
09-25-2012, 07:03 PM
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
09-25-2012, 07:17 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
What amazes me is how completely ignorant NFL headquarters is to the mess they've created. The refs are scabs, that's one thing, the PR debacle is a whole 'notha story.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
