Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
OK, so there definitely are "Commuter slots". Here is an example of a transaction involving them:
Republic Airways Completes Purchase of Embraer 170 Aircraft and Slot Assets from US Airways Group. - Free Online Library
Please note they're clearly defined as "Commuter slots" in the article. I don't see any such remark in our press release.
Republic Airways Completes Purchase of Embraer 170 Aircraft and Slot Assets from US Airways Group. - Free Online Library
Please note they're clearly defined as "Commuter slots" in the article. I don't see any such remark in our press release.
I couldn't care less if I "get ignored pretty quickly". You are MORE than welcome to ignore me. I won't take offense.
I have seen attitude on this thread just as I see attitude on a regional thread. I have nothing BUT respect for you guys. As I hope you feel the same about the regional guys.
This little discussion has gone far enough. Let's get back to the subject.
Once again, I want nothing more to see the mainline grow. I'm all for stopping the regional out-of-control growth that was occuring just a year ago. I hope the "bigger" jets Delta is talking about is at least a DC-9. I think that maybe mainline can take some of their routes back if 76 seaters are pulled to fly some of the LGA routes. Routes like MSP-SLC...or SLC-SEA.
I guess those slots were lcc's. That means more mainline. This is great for us.
There is no gates or slots designated commuter - that's just how they've been used.
As to using 50 seaters and not pulling mainliners dream on - there are plenty of spare NB to use and they can backfill with DC9s currebtly (apx 35) in the desert
As to using 50 seaters and not pulling mainliners dream on - there are plenty of spare NB to use and they can backfill with DC9s currebtly (apx 35) in the desert
I am here and sir 757 stated it best. I live and breathe this stuff and can connect most dots. IMHO this has rjet written all over it. I think they owned most of those gates.
Also I bet rjet gets lcc's 190's. I personally think this is the first of a few changes up in NYC. Burn is correct we are doing a lot of work there. More to come. I bet this will be both rj's and Mainline. This AE should give some insight to that.
Also not sure it is connected but Boeing has 61 orders for 73n's that they will not announce customers for. It is two orders the 700 would play nice. I am not inferring these are ours, just pointing to some of my dots an the wall. I just hope they do not move Mesa back in!
This should put us at staffing neutral at worst! I would not say hiring quite yet.
Also I bet rjet gets lcc's 190's. I personally think this is the first of a few changes up in NYC. Burn is correct we are doing a lot of work there. More to come. I bet this will be both rj's and Mainline. This AE should give some insight to that.
Also not sure it is connected but Boeing has 61 orders for 73n's that they will not announce customers for. It is two orders the 700 would play nice. I am not inferring these are ours, just pointing to some of my dots an the wall. I just hope they do not move Mesa back in!
This should put us at staffing neutral at worst! I would not say hiring quite yet.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 309
Piker,
If I understand correctly, Delta can't indiscriminately add more 76-seaters in the system. The 76-seaters they have already are currently used elsewhere. So even if we assume that all of this LGA flying is 76-seat RJ's, then you have to conclude that many, if not all of the markets currently served by 76-seaters need a replacement aircraft (since they were important enough to see the use of a limited number of 76-seaters).
The only options, with 76-seat aircraft being limited, then is to a) downgrade, or b) upgrade. If those markets deserved two-class service yesterday, it seems that it would be a poor move to field 50-seat or single-class 70-seat aircraft to replace them today. I would think one way or another, this helps DC-9 flying, and all narrow-body flying. In LGA, or elsewhere.
So, I'm optimistic as well. Optimistic for mainline.
If I understand correctly, Delta can't indiscriminately add more 76-seaters in the system. The 76-seaters they have already are currently used elsewhere. So even if we assume that all of this LGA flying is 76-seat RJ's, then you have to conclude that many, if not all of the markets currently served by 76-seaters need a replacement aircraft (since they were important enough to see the use of a limited number of 76-seaters).
The only options, with 76-seat aircraft being limited, then is to a) downgrade, or b) upgrade. If those markets deserved two-class service yesterday, it seems that it would be a poor move to field 50-seat or single-class 70-seat aircraft to replace them today. I would think one way or another, this helps DC-9 flying, and all narrow-body flying. In LGA, or elsewhere.
So, I'm optimistic as well. Optimistic for mainline.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 840
ACL Do you think the E-190 coming to Delta is now a dead dea?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 309
*So we are going to pull DC9's out of the desert, train guys to fly them, and then begin service on routes previously flown by SF-34, DH-8's, and CRJ's/ERJ's and then hope we can fill them.
Or
*Are we going to use the leftover 50 seaters from CVG, ATL, and where ever else we eliminate service/replace with DC-9's to initiate these routes.
Down the line your idea sounds plausible, but it sounds like the safer, surer thing is use the toys we already have out...at least for now.
I admit I do not know the details of excatly which slots are which, but there is a smart way to enter a market and a wreckless one.
As much as I want mainline growth, I'd feel much more comfortable if we grew slow and steady verses going all in. It's not like we'd be adding 50 seaters, just putting the ones we already have out to good use.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 309
Remember the majority of Comair has been pushed out to NY (JFK) and continuously asked by management for a Co-Domicile LGA/JFK for the past few months.
I don't know where they are at with that, but it fits.
I don't know where they are at with that, but it fits.
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,989
Note the words Delta uses to describe the trade:
"While more than 40 percent of US Airways’ current LaGuardia schedule is operated with small turboprops, Delta plans to use the same limited airport takeoff and landing rights to operate a schedule with all slots occupied by jet aircraft."
The politicians have feared service from smaller airports would be locked out of New York if they were not allowed slots for aircraft limited to lower seat capacity. I'm not expert on how the locals gained control of this issue from the DOT/FAA, but you will recall that when the DOT proposed slot restrictions for larger aircraft only they were ultimately defeated.
So, this looks like more small jet flying to me. With the NWA merger Delta may have all the DCA slots it needs, so it might not have given up much in the trade, but still the sum looks like less mainline flying and more regional lift (or less shrinkage as the case may be).
Since we have decided on the MEC level not to study the benefits of unity with Compass, we are not in a position to gain anything from this deal. That probably explains why there is not a need for more staffing ... .
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post