Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
I didn't say my reps don't know I said they weren't approached. I heard the ousted regime was muttering recall before Roberts even took office. Are you really surprised? I guess we'll find out if they are or they aren't - one of those self critiquing, self validating rumors.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: 73 lifer
Posts: 130
My check was around $600. That's almost 15% of my dues for last year. I know premerger NW got less but I'll take that money thank you very much.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 273
I didn't say my reps don't know I said they weren't approached. I heard the ousted regime was muttering recall before Roberts even took office. Are you really surprised? I guess we'll find out if they are or they aren't - one of those self critiquing, self validating rumors.
Last edited by bigbusdriver; 05-12-2013 at 10:55 AM. Reason: ...
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,008
Something is up, but isn't it always?
There are good parts of both administrations. Since both administrations take their orders from the same ALPA President, there is not a great difference who holds those positions. The difference between enthusiastic support and tacit agreement is about the same when you are so paralyzed as to allow another pilot group to come in and do a deal with your management without your objection.
We should have expected push back from the Pinnacle cram down. IMHO if this administration is going to survive they must assert their power and differentiate themselves from their predecessors. The Pinnacle situation was the perfect opportunity to assert our MEC's power. Moak and ALPA National went completely off the reservation.
There are two schools of thought. The current view is that if we don't address our problems no one else will notice them. If no one realizes there is a problem, then the DPA can't use that issue.
In contrast, I think the line pilots would more respect an administration which was willing to fight national when the rights of their pilots' autonomy are violated. Better to be seen enforcing the rules than to be seen as sycophantic.
I don't want a recall, but at the end of the day it makes little difference which politicians are in office if we are going to follow the same wrongheaded policy to facilitate outsourcing our jobs.
That's my opinion; what's yours? Activist administration that demands national do what we want or constructive engagement with national?
There are good parts of both administrations. Since both administrations take their orders from the same ALPA President, there is not a great difference who holds those positions. The difference between enthusiastic support and tacit agreement is about the same when you are so paralyzed as to allow another pilot group to come in and do a deal with your management without your objection.
We should have expected push back from the Pinnacle cram down. IMHO if this administration is going to survive they must assert their power and differentiate themselves from their predecessors. The Pinnacle situation was the perfect opportunity to assert our MEC's power. Moak and ALPA National went completely off the reservation.
There are two schools of thought. The current view is that if we don't address our problems no one else will notice them. If no one realizes there is a problem, then the DPA can't use that issue.
In contrast, I think the line pilots would more respect an administration which was willing to fight national when the rights of their pilots' autonomy are violated. Better to be seen enforcing the rules than to be seen as sycophantic.
I don't want a recall, but at the end of the day it makes little difference which politicians are in office if we are going to follow the same wrongheaded policy to facilitate outsourcing our jobs.
That's my opinion; what's yours? Activist administration that demands national do what we want or constructive engagement with national?
Last edited by Bucking Bar; 05-12-2013 at 11:47 AM.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,944
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,902
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,902
Oh ok. Well if DPA happened in the future, it would be the end of ALPA. With the new AA/US/AWA being APA and Delta being DPA, that would leave only United as ALPA and the regionals. FedEx, too but that wouldn't be enough for ALPA to exist long term. Losing 12,000 Delta pilots will be the kiss of death for ALPA.
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,008
Mommy Delta's been spending a lot of time with Richard Branson, an Eskimo, a Frenchman, an Italian, a Dutchman, a Mormon and a whole bunch of lationos. We kids sometimes worry about other children from these affairs.
Your mom claims to be a Virgin, but if you look at her checking account, she's been pulling tricks.
Maybe we should not compare airlines to our mothers.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,902
Died of natural causes.
Mommy Delta's been spending a lot of time with Richard Branson, an Eskimo, a Frenchman, an Italian, a Dutchman, a Mormon and a whole bunch of lationos. We kids sometimes worry about other children from these affairs.
Your mom claims to be a Virgin, but if you look at her checking account, she's been pulling tricks.
Maybe we should not compare airlines to our mothers.
Mommy Delta's been spending a lot of time with Richard Branson, an Eskimo, a Frenchman, an Italian, a Dutchman, a Mormon and a whole bunch of lationos. We kids sometimes worry about other children from these affairs.
Your mom claims to be a Virgin, but if you look at her checking account, she's been pulling tricks.
Maybe we should not compare airlines to our mothers.
But don't forget, it was Delta back in the day who gave the mother the go ahead to stop using the pill and have tons of 50-seater infants...
I always thought of him as more of a Moaker than the last chairman based on his ALPA forum posts and participation in the bankruptcy and merger as the money man. If there really are regimes voting then they picked a more Moakier chairman. That doesn't make sense in the premise of a Demoakracy controlling everything, because why would they vote in a staunch Moaker?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post