Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 06-11-2013 | 12:38 PM
  #132461  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Default Only 11 757's leaving by next spring?

I was surprised to hear this on the update. I thought the numbers being thrown around were in the 30-40's by summer 14.
Old 06-11-2013 | 12:59 PM
  #132462  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 106
From: Road construction signholder
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Umm...the strike?
Are you talking the NWA strike? (1997 I believe?). I remember it well. You all (if you were PMNW) conducted an impeccable 2-week strike, and it resulted in a...drum roll...12% raise over either three or four years. Further, once your MEC ratified the post-strike TA, it was immediately back to work--you didn't even have membership ratification at that time (DAL didn't either until 1996).

So while I salute you over a well-conducted (and needed) strike, I would contend that it was a fair at best financial result, and one that today would probably be roundly criticized.
Old 06-11-2013 | 01:46 PM
  #132463  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 5
From: 737 Left
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
Are you talking the NWA strike? (1997 I believe?). I remember it well. You all (if you were PMNW) conducted an impeccable 2-week strike, and it resulted in a...drum roll...12% raise over either three or four years. Further, once your MEC ratified the post-strike TA, it was immediately back to work--you didn't even have membership ratification at that time (DAL didn't either until 1996).

So while I salute you over a well-conducted (and needed) strike, I would contend that it was a fair at best financial result, and one that today would probably be roundly criticized.
If it was fair, why should it be criticized? Or are you saying it was fair, as in less than good but better than poor.
Old 06-11-2013 | 01:48 PM
  #132464  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 5
From: 737 Left
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
In NYC that's like 3 billion dollar's worth of gates at present rates.

Of course you only get that deep discount if you destroy a similar number of gates.




Wait.

What?
That was funny right there!
Old 06-11-2013 | 02:02 PM
  #132465  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,263
Likes: 105
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by NERD
What kind of FAA doc do you go to that gives an MRI?

Ooops. I meant EKG.

Scoop
Old 06-11-2013 | 02:38 PM
  #132466  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
My point was that we are looking to realign our scope with whatever the company wants to do in the moment. The NRT limits were set to protect our jobs.... here we are staring down more ER displacements, yet again. Remember, the company came to us saying that they intend to violate our scope.... that's how this started.

Let's see where this evolution is likely to go:

When we allow NRT to be pulled down because it's "less optimum," then we change to do point to point to other places in, say, China... we will then be codesharing with Chinese partners hubs. Our Asia hub gets pulled down, theirs grows while we continue to mitigate our most senior and highest paying jobs. Exactly what the AF/KL JV has done with the nice international flying you used to do on the ER.

Again, call your rep and talk to him about this. There is potentially more job losses at stake if we do not give relief. Think what you will, but talk to your rep.
Old 06-11-2013 | 02:39 PM
  #132467  
capncrunch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,355
Likes: 34
Default

Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
If it was fair, why should it be criticized? Or are you saying it was fair, as in less than good but better than poor.
He has no point. He's being argumentative and bloviates that bending over is a better approach than fighting.

Sad at best.
Old 06-11-2013 | 02:47 PM
  #132468  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
So this NRT thing is roughly 5000* pax per year on codeshare flights.....

That translates to about 417 code share passengers per month. Code shares don't make Delta much money, they get a finder's fee (ref ALK).

A finder's fee for a code share is probably around $50 per ticket*.

This is worth roughly $20,850 per month to Delta, a shade under $250k per year. Revenue estimates for 2013 are around $38 BILLION. This would equate to 0.00000657631579% of the revenue for Delta.

So, tell me how much the Company really cares if ALPA makes them cancel the codeshare again?


All calculations are subject to error:
*per a previous poster
**per previous discussion on a thread somewhere
Exactly. And what is the potential downside? We say nope. You have to pull down the codeshare and then they say fine, we are gonna cut all the unprofitable flying to/from NRT since we have no contractual obligations anymore. I have no idea of the profitability of those flights, and I highly suggest that those that are grabbing their pitchforks better get that data before you go down this path. The downside risk could very well be more detrimental than beneficial. That being said, I would guess the company still does desire labor peace, so we will have a little leverage to negotiate from. We will see in September.
Old 06-11-2013 | 02:51 PM
  #132469  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
"Seriously?"

Obviously, the company wants the codeshares, else they would not have come crying to ALPA for relief.
Crying? Really?
Old 06-11-2013 | 02:52 PM
  #132470  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Free Mason
Nope. Not at all.

What is the other idea that is being floated? Grieve it and have them pull the code share as a result. 316 does not matter any more, and they are free to pull down NRT at will. Yeah, I can see this web board after a decision like that.

Did you notice that there is no LOA, and we are months away from one? Would you have preferred a knee jerk response that left the pilots with less? Sounds good in theory until you have to test it. From talking to my two Reps, I can tell you that they explored many options. This one worked best and allowed the pilots to be brought in to the loop. A first in a long time.
Precisely.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices