Uh, no.

The contract is very explicit. Beyond next-day open time will be covered automatically via PCS. Reserves are not even considered except for same or next-day open time.

Yes 117 is causing the company headaches, and yes it is beyond absurd that SD is trying to circumvent the contract via memo. But all that is related to reserve assignment rules, none of which are ever considered until the day prior at the earliest. There is no way the company could award a trip to a reserve two or three days out just to make scheduling's job easier.

 

Except the fantasy memo in question is completely irrelevant. There is no 2 hour leash. Never was. The full spirit and intent of the 3 hours prior wasn't the 3 hours part, it was always and very clearly the 9 hour "blackout" period to rest uninterrupted so we're not on what would otherwise be a 24 hour acknowledgement quasi short call. I think SD is very, very smart. But for him to whip out the 2 hour fantasy leash isn't a very good example of wit or intelligence. Its pretty transparent that he was ordered to preserve 12 hour long call concept by any means necessary so he tried to rewrite the contract unilaterally within the contraints of the mandate he was given so as to preserve existing staffing flexibility that 12 hour leashes provide, despite the fact that is now an obselete concept. This was clearly a case of "just following orders" but its still irrelevant because the company can't rewrite the contract all by itself.

If the two glasses are undrinkable, then we need another glass. This is easilly solveable by the company, they are just choosing not to constructively engage the pilot group to do it and are instead relying on unilateral fiat that borders on flat out bullying. We have to see this through though. Not only to prevent the massive concession of a 2 hour fantasy leash, which would be a QOL destroyer especially for commuters, but to avoid setting the precedent that the company can just write themselves whatever contract they want with the self granted authority of a bankruptcy judge anytime they feel there is a need. That is simply not the case.

I'm sure DALPA would pencil whip a 19 hour long call with a 9 hour leash right now, and probably a couple hours shorter with some other minor issues being addressed. But 12 is simply unworkable and a 2 hour fantasy leash isn't some great intellectual case to drink from the glass of reasonableness. Its someone slapping their nightstick in their hand while saying "dance monkey, dance".

 

Happy New Year, bro!

 

There ya go!

 

 

Looks like 117 will be put to the test. How are other airlines managing the reserve obligation issue?

 

If you think 117 reserve is a QOL hit for commuters, it becomes impossibly bad for ULH reserve commuters. The new rest requirement pre-short call for ULH means they cannot back to back short call. That's a sharp stick in the eye for commuting to reserve ULH. I predict 777 reserve to go either junior or to non commuters.

So, my previous question about rolling thunder became moot...there's no way I'd voluntarily commute to reserve again.

 

I just saw catching fire. If you have read the book, it's a must see...extremely well done.

 

Lol, I am "stuck" in GND. Flight cancelled tomorrow.

 

Then: "Stay humble."

Now: "Keep your backpack on."


It's amusing when the greediest of capitalists trots out leftist rallying cries to whip up the proles.