Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: 7ER Capt
I thought we all knew we were getting into a seniority based system. I agree to a small leveling of the good deals (ie., all offered 1 gs before a second gs is offered).
But seriously, now we want to level the time awarded? Where shall we end this socialism... we take turns flying the 777 or how about we take turns flying Christmas.
Uh, no thanks. Since it took me 26yrs and commuting to another base to finally get some seniority, I'll vote for the current system. (Which requires one to read, understand and know one's contract to reap maximum benefits.)
As far as gs's, put in your parameters and take your chances.
Good luck.
But seriously, now we want to level the time awarded? Where shall we end this socialism... we take turns flying the 777 or how about we take turns flying Christmas.
Uh, no thanks. Since it took me 26yrs and commuting to another base to finally get some seniority, I'll vote for the current system. (Which requires one to read, understand and know one's contract to reap maximum benefits.)
As far as gs's, put in your parameters and take your chances.
Good luck.
I get that and that is what a lot of us do, but follow me on this for a second.
Say you want to try and make some extra $$$ for the month. You put in a GS for a 2 or 3 day trip. The guy 1 number senior to you gets a 4 day GS worth 22:00. A few hours later you get a 2 day that pays 10:30.
The next week you still feel like working for a little more $$$ so you put in the same preference for a 2 or 3 day GS. Up pops a nice 17:00 3-day and it goes to the guy one number senior to you on his 2nd GS. An hour later another 10:30 2 days shows up and it's yours.
At the end of the month you both did 2 GS's. The guy right above you has 39 hours of GS pay and you have 21. If we had a system that assigned them based on GS hours instead of the actual number of GS's you would have ended up with 27:30 and he would have ended up with 32:30. You would have gotten the 3 day he would have gotten the 2 day.
I know there are a lot more variables that come into play, it just evens out the amount of hours and takes the luck of the crappy trip showing up for any given person out of the equation. If you take the crappy one, you will get another one before the lucky guy who gets the goldmine.
Say you want to try and make some extra $$$ for the month. You put in a GS for a 2 or 3 day trip. The guy 1 number senior to you gets a 4 day GS worth 22:00. A few hours later you get a 2 day that pays 10:30.
The next week you still feel like working for a little more $$$ so you put in the same preference for a 2 or 3 day GS. Up pops a nice 17:00 3-day and it goes to the guy one number senior to you on his 2nd GS. An hour later another 10:30 2 days shows up and it's yours.
At the end of the month you both did 2 GS's. The guy right above you has 39 hours of GS pay and you have 21. If we had a system that assigned them based on GS hours instead of the actual number of GS's you would have ended up with 27:30 and he would have ended up with 32:30. You would have gotten the 3 day he would have gotten the 2 day.
I know there are a lot more variables that come into play, it just evens out the amount of hours and takes the luck of the crappy trip showing up for any given person out of the equation. If you take the crappy one, you will get another one before the lucky guy who gets the goldmine.
FTS
A big problem I see with the reserve system is that the company has the luxury to use reserves from any base to cover any other bases' flying without penalty. If you are a lineholder in a category that is thin on reserves, too bad for you because you are unable to drop trips. The company on the other hand can cover your bases' trips with a reserve from a fat category with no penalty. And spare me the manning formula garbage... (not you PD). What should happen is that in any given category, all reserves from (let's say) east of the Mississippi should count for reserve availability for all bases east of the Mississippi. Example: If any NY category is even, and Atlanta is over, the NY pilots should be able to drop based on that overage. IOW, we should be able to take advantage of the company's flexibility also. I'll make a lot of noise about this in the upcoming negotiations....
I thought we all knew we were getting into a seniority based system. I agree to a small leveling of the good deals (ie., all offered 1 gs before a second gs is offered).
But seriously, now we want to level the time awarded? Where shall we end this socialism... we take turns flying the 777 or how about we take turns flying Christmas.
Uh, no thanks. Since it took me 26yrs and commuting to another base to finally get some seniority, I'll vote for the current system. (Which requires one to read, understand and know one's contract to reap maximum benefits.)
As far as gs's, put in your parameters and take your chances.
Good luck.
But seriously, now we want to level the time awarded? Where shall we end this socialism... we take turns flying the 777 or how about we take turns flying Christmas.
Uh, no thanks. Since it took me 26yrs and commuting to another base to finally get some seniority, I'll vote for the current system. (Which requires one to read, understand and know one's contract to reap maximum benefits.)
As far as gs's, put in your parameters and take your chances.
Good luck.
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 5
If you get a one day GS that blocks say 4:30 do you get 9 hrs or 10:30?
Denny
I didn't like the 31/30 change, it was a concession that was traded for something else within the reserve system that was a benefit to the pilot group.
Bold is incorrect.
Under C2012, you are "Full" when you reach res. Guar...usually ALV-2:00 (or even less)
Before C2012, you were "Full" when you reached ALV or were within 2:00 of ALV because of DPM of 2:00.
Training did nothing fill up faster and lower your "Full" limit prior to C2012. Now it has a direct impact by lowering your "Full" and also replacing reserve days instead of pro-rating them. That means at least 2 extra days off each year.
Old PWA:
Res pay 70:00
Full when within ALV minus 2:00.
New PWA:
Res Pay 72:00-80:00
Full when within ALV minus 2:00-4:00
There is some myth out there that reserve pilots were done at 70:00 prior to the new PWA. That is not the case... Reserves were PAID 70:00 unless they flew above that up to the ALV.
Now: Reserves are paid 2-10 hours MORE than that whether they credit above 70:00 or not and they get up to 2 more true days off per month.
Reserve being a "massive concession" just isn't true. It is significantly better under the new PWA.
Bold is incorrect.
Under C2012, you are "Full" when you reach res. Guar...usually ALV-2:00 (or even less)
Before C2012, you were "Full" when you reached ALV or were within 2:00 of ALV because of DPM of 2:00.
Training did nothing fill up faster and lower your "Full" limit prior to C2012. Now it has a direct impact by lowering your "Full" and also replacing reserve days instead of pro-rating them. That means at least 2 extra days off each year.
Old PWA:
Res pay 70:00
Full when within ALV minus 2:00.
New PWA:
Res Pay 72:00-80:00
Full when within ALV minus 2:00-4:00
There is some myth out there that reserve pilots were done at 70:00 prior to the new PWA. That is not the case... Reserves were PAID 70:00 unless they flew above that up to the ALV.
Now: Reserves are paid 2-10 hours MORE than that whether they credit above 70:00 or not and they get up to 2 more true days off per month.
Reserve being a "massive concession" just isn't true. It is significantly better under the new PWA.
on that note, 717 new cities BTR, Lafayette LA and Shreveport.
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






