![]() |
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1703338)
"When referring to Delta, don’t disparage our brand by using profanity or hateful language, or posting items that could place the company in a negative light."
The above is a small part of their social online policy. They have avenues for criticism. I don't think they consider this one they want used. |
Originally Posted by badflaps
(Post 1703342)
Very little else they can do to me, oh! Maybe take away my S3B's, Yuk! Yuk! Yuk!
|
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 1703343)
How about Endeavor, where the company threatens to fire you, you say "go ahead", and then they immediately apologize, and beg you not to quit.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1703338)
"When referring to Delta, don’t disparage our brand by... posting items that could place the company in a negative light."
I would be surprised if disparaging a corporation is protected the same as disparaging an individual... but one never knows in this crazy world. I know an employer can establish policy, but in doing so, I don't think they can violate the Constitution. (Of course by disparaging, I mean writing verifiable facts that might not be pleasant to read, but are true.) |
Originally Posted by LivingTheDream
(Post 1703373)
I wonder if this has been challenged at the Supreme Court level (1st amendment, freedom of speech and all that).
I would be surprised if disparaging a corporation is protected the same as disparaging an individual... but one never knows in this crazy world. I know an employer can establish policy, but in doing so, I don't think they can violate the Constitution. (Of course by disparaging, I mean writing verifiable facts that might not be pleasant to read, but are true.) You are guaranteed freedom of speech by the Constitution, but you're not guaranteed continued employment by Delta. |
Originally Posted by LivingTheDream
(Post 1703373)
I wonder if this has been challenged at the Supreme Court level (1st amendment, freedom of speech and all that).
I would be surprised if disparaging a corporation is protected the same as disparaging an individual... but one never knows in this crazy world. I know an employer can establish policy, but in doing so, I don't think they can violate the Constitution. (Of course by disparaging, I mean writing verifiable facts that might not be pleasant to read, but are true.) |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1703338)
"When referring to Delta, don’t disparage our brand by using profanity or hateful language, or posting items that could place the company in a negative light."
The above is a small part of their social online policy. They have avenues for criticism. I don't think they consider this one they want used. |
Originally Posted by LivingTheDream
(Post 1703373)
I wonder if this has been challenged at the Supreme Court level (1st amendment, freedom of speech and all that).
I would be surprised if disparaging a corporation is protected the same as disparaging an individual... but one never knows in this crazy world. I know an employer can establish policy, but in doing so, I don't think they can violate the Constitution. (Of course by disparaging, I mean writing verifiable facts that might not be pleasant to read, but are true.) Delta, or any other employer (except the government), can restrict any kind of speech they want to. The only thing that protects employees is their bargaining agent and/or the possibility of bad publicity. |
Originally Posted by Delta1067
(Post 1703308)
Yeah, but think about how hot their F/A's were and the fact that they were prob banging them.
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1703287)
...will that bid help avoid the 21 day in the row coverage awards?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:47 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands