Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
I'm posting this here because I need an answer pretty quickly,and this thread gets more traffic than any of the others.
I'm charged with putting together a CARE package for a Delta guy who's in Iraq. What kind of things are most appreciated by the guys over there? No guesses or assumptions, please: I can do that. What I'm looking for is firsthand information, or direct feedback from someone who was there.
Thanks in advance for your help!
I'm charged with putting together a CARE package for a Delta guy who's in Iraq. What kind of things are most appreciated by the guys over there? No guesses or assumptions, please: I can do that. What I'm looking for is firsthand information, or direct feedback from someone who was there.
Thanks in advance for your help!
Balad.
Thanks again for all of the replies!
Thanks again for all of the replies!
Last edited by CVG767A; 11-03-2009 at 03:01 PM.
...........................
Last edited by caddis; 11-03-2009 at 02:00 PM. Reason: .........
Greenwood, Mississippi
In the 1960s and 1970s, the airport received airline service from Southern Airways with daily service to Jackson, MS and Memphis, TN. When Southern Airways merged with North Central Airlines to form Republic Airlines, airline service was dropped at Greenwood.
Moderator
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,263
Likes: 105
From: DAL 330
[quote=Free Bird;705779]
By way of comparison, AMR can have 25 70 seat jets!!!! Continental can't have ANY 70 seat jets. If those numbers don't get your attention I don't what will.
Its the old "bait and switch," anytime someone brings up those numbers the typical response is "Well how many Pilots do they have on furlough?" The only problem with this comparison is that we would have similar furlough numbers were it not for all the early retirements.
An alternate comparison would be how many pilots would we be hiring if we did not outsource so many mainline jets? Now you can get pretty carried away with these hypotheticals and I think DALPA is very good at most things, but Scope protection is not one of them.
Scoop
By way of comparison, AMR can have 25 70 seat jets!!!! Continental can't have ANY 70 seat jets. If those numbers don't get your attention I don't what will.
Its the old "bait and switch," anytime someone brings up those numbers the typical response is "Well how many Pilots do they have on furlough?" The only problem with this comparison is that we would have similar furlough numbers were it not for all the early retirements.
An alternate comparison would be how many pilots would we be hiring if we did not outsource so many mainline jets? Now you can get pretty carried away with these hypotheticals and I think DALPA is very good at most things, but Scope protection is not one of them.
Scoop
Buzz, Caddis, and all others who replied, thanks for your advice! Any more ideas are always appreciated, though--
Other than the bankruptcy deal, could you elaborate. If you can't understand the significant risks to labor in bankruptcy, then you have been living in a cave for the last 7 years.
Since bankruptcy, there have been a series of agreements, primarily in regards to the Joint Venture that have strengthened our scope. We now have the tightest Joint Venture protections in the industry. If there is a "history" of selling scope concessions, you should at least be able to name one.
Since bankruptcy, there have been a series of agreements, primarily in regards to the Joint Venture that have strengthened our scope. We now have the tightest Joint Venture protections in the industry. If there is a "history" of selling scope concessions, you should at least be able to name one.
The latest outrage was the scope "settlement" that he didn't even bother to tell the pilots about before he signed it. (allowing still more 76 seat aircraft)
That was sold based on Moak's telling us we should fear that the contract might be interpreted wrong by an arbitrator. So we better not fight the grievance all the way. Too dangerous.
I don't have the contracts and LOAs in front of me right now but the number of permitted large RJs has risen steadily under Moak and that needs to stop.
The bankruptcy and the merger both came with relaxation of scope restrictions.
The latest outrage was the scope "settlement" that he didn't even bother to tell the pilots about before he signed it. (allowing still more 76 seat aircraft)
That was sold based on Moak's telling us we should fear that the contract might be interpreted wrong by an arbitrator. So we better not fight the grievance all the way. Too dangerous.
I don't have the contracts and LOAs in front of me right now but the number of permitted large RJs has risen steadily under Moak and that needs to stop.
The latest outrage was the scope "settlement" that he didn't even bother to tell the pilots about before he signed it. (allowing still more 76 seat aircraft)
That was sold based on Moak's telling us we should fear that the contract might be interpreted wrong by an arbitrator. So we better not fight the grievance all the way. Too dangerous.
I don't have the contracts and LOAs in front of me right now but the number of permitted large RJs has risen steadily under Moak and that needs to stop.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
The bankruptcy and the merger both came with relaxation of scope restrictions.
The latest outrage was the scope "settlement" that he didn't even bother to tell the pilots about before he signed it. (allowing still more 76 seat aircraft)
That was sold based on Moak's telling us we should fear that the contract might be interpreted wrong by an arbitrator. So we better not fight the grievance all the way. Too dangerous.
I don't have the contracts and LOAs in front of me right now but the number of permitted large RJs has risen steadily under Moak and that needs to stop.
The latest outrage was the scope "settlement" that he didn't even bother to tell the pilots about before he signed it. (allowing still more 76 seat aircraft)
That was sold based on Moak's telling us we should fear that the contract might be interpreted wrong by an arbitrator. So we better not fight the grievance all the way. Too dangerous.
I don't have the contracts and LOAs in front of me right now but the number of permitted large RJs has risen steadily under Moak and that needs to stop.
Look at the DALPA web site under Committees > Negotiating Committee and find the LOA that permits more large RJ's. Post the language here. It is pretty weak to say, "Oh, there have been a bunch, but I am too lazy to actually read my contract." You can look and look and you won't find one since the bankruptcy deal. I do read my contract and every single agreement since bankruptcy that concerns scope has been a gain for pilots. Not massive gains, but you don't win the game by just hitting homers, you have to get singles and doubles too.
As for the grievance settlement. The last two grievances that were filed about large RJ's were filed by American and US Air. They both took the "ballsy" approach and went all the way to the arbitrator and didn't settle. Both pilot groups lost completely. Under our settlement, the company got to retain the RJ's they had on order, but they also agreed permanently to our interpretation of the contract. We also got furlough protection out of it. Again, if you can't even acknowledge the inherent risks of letting strangers decide things for you then you are living in a fantasy world.
Its the old "bait and switch," anytime someone brings up those numbers the typical response is "Well how many Pilots do they have on furlough?" The only problem with this comparison is that we would have similar furlough numbers were it not for all the early retirements.
If we are going to argue about the issues, it seems we should at least have some semblance of the truth buried into our basic assumptions. Assuming no gravity, I can fly my jet with very little fuel. I would be Al Gore's hero.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





