Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2009 | 01:43 PM
  #16881  
buzzpat's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,070
Likes: 1
From: Urban chicken rancher.
Default

Originally Posted by CVG767A
I'm posting this here because I need an answer pretty quickly,and this thread gets more traffic than any of the others.

I'm charged with putting together a CARE package for a Delta guy who's in Iraq. What kind of things are most appreciated by the guys over there? No guesses or assumptions, please: I can do that. What I'm looking for is firsthand information, or direct feedback from someone who was there.

Thanks in advance for your help!
Is he at Camp Victory or Liberty? Or Balad? I've been there and can provide some good ideas. It would help to know where he is. Shoot me a PM.
Old 11-03-2009 | 01:46 PM
  #16882  
CVG767A's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
From: 767ER capt
Default

Balad.

Thanks again for all of the replies!

Last edited by CVG767A; 11-03-2009 at 03:01 PM.
Old 11-03-2009 | 01:47 PM
  #16883  
cheyenne's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Double Breasted Leather
Default

..........
Old 11-03-2009 | 01:54 PM
  #16884  
caddis's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: 320B
Default

...........................

Last edited by caddis; 11-03-2009 at 02:00 PM. Reason: .........
Old 11-03-2009 | 01:58 PM
  #16885  
cheyenne's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Double Breasted Leather
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
DC-10s! Where are those parked? Go get em' out on the line!


Found them, one thought: DC-10s + Gallons of Secretariat Glue = Jobs.

KGWO
Greenwood, Mississippi

In the 1960s and 1970s, the airport received airline service from Southern Airways with daily service to Jackson, MS and Memphis, TN. When Southern Airways merged with North Central Airlines to form Republic Airlines, airline service was dropped at Greenwood.
Old 11-03-2009 | 02:00 PM
  #16886  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,263
Likes: 105
From: DAL 330
Default

[quote=Free Bird;705779]

By way of comparison, AMR can have 25 70 seat jets!!!! Continental can't have ANY 70 seat jets. If those numbers don't get your attention I don't what will.


Its the old "bait and switch," anytime someone brings up those numbers the typical response is "Well how many Pilots do they have on furlough?" The only problem with this comparison is that we would have similar furlough numbers were it not for all the early retirements.

An alternate comparison would be how many pilots would we be hiring if we did not outsource so many mainline jets? Now you can get pretty carried away with these hypotheticals and I think DALPA is very good at most things, but Scope protection is not one of them.

Scoop
Old 11-03-2009 | 02:19 PM
  #16887  
CVG767A's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
From: 767ER capt
Default

Buzz, Caddis, and all others who replied, thanks for your advice! Any more ideas are always appreciated, though--
Old 11-03-2009 | 04:10 PM
  #16888  
Check Essential's Avatar
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: 737 ATL
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
Other than the bankruptcy deal, could you elaborate. If you can't understand the significant risks to labor in bankruptcy, then you have been living in a cave for the last 7 years.

Since bankruptcy, there have been a series of agreements, primarily in regards to the Joint Venture that have strengthened our scope. We now have the tightest Joint Venture protections in the industry. If there is a "history" of selling scope concessions, you should at least be able to name one.
The bankruptcy and the merger both came with relaxation of scope restrictions.
The latest outrage was the scope "settlement" that he didn't even bother to tell the pilots about before he signed it. (allowing still more 76 seat aircraft)
That was sold based on Moak's telling us we should fear that the contract might be interpreted wrong by an arbitrator. So we better not fight the grievance all the way. Too dangerous.
I don't have the contracts and LOAs in front of me right now but the number of permitted large RJs has risen steadily under Moak and that needs to stop.
Old 11-03-2009 | 04:12 PM
  #16889  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
The bankruptcy and the merger both came with relaxation of scope restrictions.
The latest outrage was the scope "settlement" that he didn't even bother to tell the pilots about before he signed it. (allowing still more 76 seat aircraft)
That was sold based on Moak's telling us we should fear that the contract might be interpreted wrong by an arbitrator. So we better not fight the grievance all the way. Too dangerous.
I don't have the contracts and LOAs in front of me right now but the number of permitted large RJs has risen steadily under Moak and that needs to stop.
Read the article in the Roar. I would love to hear comments on that.
Old 11-03-2009 | 06:42 PM
  #16890  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
The bankruptcy and the merger both came with relaxation of scope restrictions.
The latest outrage was the scope "settlement" that he didn't even bother to tell the pilots about before he signed it. (allowing still more 76 seat aircraft)
That was sold based on Moak's telling us we should fear that the contract might be interpreted wrong by an arbitrator. So we better not fight the grievance all the way. Too dangerous.
I don't have the contracts and LOAs in front of me right now but the number of permitted large RJs has risen steadily under Moak and that needs to stop.
Okay, that's just wrong. Before the merger, the limit on 70+ was 200 at Delta and 90 at Northwest. After the merger it was not 290 but 255 (a 12% reduction). Admittedly it is still in need of improvement, but if there were a 12% increase, you would be screaming bloody murder, so you should at least acknowledge in passing some forward movement.

Look at the DALPA web site under Committees > Negotiating Committee and find the LOA that permits more large RJ's. Post the language here. It is pretty weak to say, "Oh, there have been a bunch, but I am too lazy to actually read my contract." You can look and look and you won't find one since the bankruptcy deal. I do read my contract and every single agreement since bankruptcy that concerns scope has been a gain for pilots. Not massive gains, but you don't win the game by just hitting homers, you have to get singles and doubles too.

As for the grievance settlement. The last two grievances that were filed about large RJ's were filed by American and US Air. They both took the "ballsy" approach and went all the way to the arbitrator and didn't settle. Both pilot groups lost completely. Under our settlement, the company got to retain the RJ's they had on order, but they also agreed permanently to our interpretation of the contract. We also got furlough protection out of it. Again, if you can't even acknowledge the inherent risks of letting strangers decide things for you then you are living in a fantasy world.

Its the old "bait and switch," anytime someone brings up those numbers the typical response is "Well how many Pilots do they have on furlough?" The only problem with this comparison is that we would have similar furlough numbers were it not for all the early retirements.
Again, completely wrong. All but a few hundred of the early retirees would have been gone by December 2007 when the age 60 rule changed. Delta recalled hundreds of pilots and then hired another 700. American has about 2000 pilots on furlough. As I said above, they just lost a grievance about the number of RJ's and they lost another grievance about the minimum size of their pilot group. They have shrunk a lot.

If we are going to argue about the issues, it seems we should at least have some semblance of the truth buried into our basic assumptions. Assuming no gravity, I can fly my jet with very little fuel. I would be Al Gore's hero.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices