Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Can't abide NAI
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
In a Boeing, it doesn't even take any peripheral vision. You don't have to "look" over at the other guy's inputs to see what he is doing. Airbus was designed to be single piloted. That's the only way that setup makes any sense. You are forced to look at things in order to see what is happening to your craft. In a Boeing, where things move physically, your peripheral vision will catch any configuration changes with which you aren't directly in your line of sight. I don't have to look at the EICAS... ECAM.. whatever the french term is to know that power has been pulled back. As to your contention that the sidestick is safer, I think exhibit A (this discussion) would argue otherwise. If the yoke is in my lap, I KNOW what the other guy is doing. No guessing... no having to figure it out...
Originally Posted by NBC
"I think it would have been much less likely to happen in a Boeing because the control wheels are large; they are obvious," Sullenberger said. "I think it could hardly have been missed."
In a Boeing, it doesn't even take any peripheral vision. You don't have to "look" over at the other guy's inputs to see what he is doing. Airbus was designed to be single piloted. That's the only way that setup makes any sense. You are forced to look at things in order to see what is happening to your craft. In a Boeing, where things move physically, your peripheral vision will catch any configuration changes with which you aren't directly in your line of sight. I don't have to look at the EICAS... ECAM.. whatever the french term is to know that power has been pulled back. As to your contention that the sidestick is safer, I think exhibit A (this discussion) would argue otherwise. If the yoke is in my lap, I KNOW what the other guy is doing. No guessing... no having to figure it out...
). Having thousands of hours in both Boeing and Airbus I can say they both have their pros and cons.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
From: A330 First Officer
Just got an email back from our retirement lady at ALPA and we WILL be getting the early profit sharing payout.
Oh I didn't take any offense whatsoever. You are right, I have zero time in anything other than a jumpseat. The funny thing is that most of the "pros" I hear about the Airbus have to do with the tray table and size of the "office". I''m old school. I like needles that point to things. It was very hard for me to take the GPS navigation leap to fly the approach into Quito (which I have not done yet for real) with nothing but a pink line to follow. And really, I am not trying to get into an airplane versus bus argument. Personally, I feel that it was the design of the thing that led to the AF crash. I realize that it is a different way of thinking and "flying"... but I still challenge the bus drivers to convince me otherwise.
You have to read the fine print.
Employee Eligibility
Most employees worldwide are eligible for the Delta Profit Sharing Plan. Officers, managing directors, directors and general managers (grade 11) are not eligible for the profit sharing plan. Neither are contractors, student workers such as co-ops and interns, and Delta Community Credit Union employees. Finally, employees based in countries or territories that have government-mandated or collectively bargained profit sharing programs are not eligible for the Delta Profit Sharing Plan.
I think that we are covered under collectively bargained profit sharing. Therefore, my interpretation is we probably won't participate.
Employee Eligibility
Most employees worldwide are eligible for the Delta Profit Sharing Plan. Officers, managing directors, directors and general managers (grade 11) are not eligible for the profit sharing plan. Neither are contractors, student workers such as co-ops and interns, and Delta Community Credit Union employees. Finally, employees based in countries or territories that have government-mandated or collectively bargained profit sharing programs are not eligible for the Delta Profit Sharing Plan.
I think that we are covered under collectively bargained profit sharing. Therefore, my interpretation is we probably won't participate.
On second thought, this language only addresses who is "eligible" for the Delta Profit Sharing Plan. We already know with 100% certainty that pilots are "eligible." It's written in our contract.
The above language doesn't address who is "eligible" as it relates to the timing of the early profit sharing, only whether you get it or not at all. The only question is, as Ragtop Day alluded to, is whether our contract overrides the company's decision to make an early payment. My guess is probably not.
Maybe THIS is the real reason for the early profit sharing payout and pay raise announcement....hmmmmm
Delta Faces Labor Push as Machinists Eye Flight Attendants
Forbes September 24, 2014
The International Association of Machinists (IAM) said it began working nearly two years ago to organize Delta’s 20,000 flight attendants, staging meetings at domestic bases and in Europe.
“Delta made a lot of promises during the merger with Northwest,” said IAM spokesman Joe Tiberi. “Now, several years later, people have seen that those promises were not kept.” For example, Tiberi said, Delta boosted flight attendant salaries, but also raised the cost of employee health care.
“It was a good sound bite to say wages went up, but in the end take-home pay went down,” Tiberi said. He declined to specify a date when IAM will file for an election.
Delta has historically been non-union except for pilots and dispatchers. Following the 2010 merger with Northwest, which historically had strong representation, unions sought to retain their spots. But Delta staged an aggressive anti-union campaign.
In three elections late in 2010, about 51% of flight attendants turned down the Association of Flight Attendants (AFA), about 52% of fleet service workers rejected IAM representation, and about 69% of customer service workers also rejected the IAM.
Earlier, AFA failed to organize Delta flight attendants in 2002 and 2008, although the union got closer in each of three elections.
“Unions have failed to organize Delta flight attendants because the direct relationship Delta has developed with our flight attendants works and is valued as an important part of the truly unique Delta culture,” said Delta spokeswoman Kate Modolo.
“We get that organizing attempts may continue because, let’s face it, dues from 20,000 people would be attractive to any union,” Modolo said. “But the IAM has a poor record in our industry and has been rejected by every work group it sought to represent following the Delta-Northwest merger.”
The United Auto Workers’ (UAW) initial failure to organize Volkswagen’s plant in Chattanooga, Tenn., in February led some to conclude that the last nail had been driven into the labor movement’s coffin in the South, but the diagnosis now seems premature.
UAW said this week that it has support from about half the plant’s 1,500 workers. It asked VW to let it negotiate for those workers.
Two weeks ago, 14,500 American agents — many based in the South — voted to join a Communication Workers of America/Teamsters coalition, which got 86% of the vote. Three-quarters of voters work in Texas, North Carolina, Florida and Arizona.
The new bargaining unit includes 9,000 agents from American, previously unrepresented, and 5,500 US Airways agents, already represented by the coalition. Teamsters represents former America West agents.
“It should not be lost on the pundits that most of the nearly 14,500 new union members work in southern states,” said AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka, in a prepared statement. “The right to a voice at work doesn’t have a geographic predisposition, and this victory will energize ongoing organizing efforts in the South.”

Delta Faces Labor Push as Machinists Eye Flight Attendants
Forbes September 24, 2014
An energized labor movement is ready to take another run at organizing Delta, despite its historic lack of success at the Atlanta-based carrier and in the South.
The International Association of Machinists (IAM) said it began working nearly two years ago to organize Delta’s 20,000 flight attendants, staging meetings at domestic bases and in Europe.
“Delta made a lot of promises during the merger with Northwest,” said IAM spokesman Joe Tiberi. “Now, several years later, people have seen that those promises were not kept.” For example, Tiberi said, Delta boosted flight attendant salaries, but also raised the cost of employee health care.
“It was a good sound bite to say wages went up, but in the end take-home pay went down,” Tiberi said. He declined to specify a date when IAM will file for an election.
Delta has historically been non-union except for pilots and dispatchers. Following the 2010 merger with Northwest, which historically had strong representation, unions sought to retain their spots. But Delta staged an aggressive anti-union campaign.
In three elections late in 2010, about 51% of flight attendants turned down the Association of Flight Attendants (AFA), about 52% of fleet service workers rejected IAM representation, and about 69% of customer service workers also rejected the IAM.
Earlier, AFA failed to organize Delta flight attendants in 2002 and 2008, although the union got closer in each of three elections.
“Unions have failed to organize Delta flight attendants because the direct relationship Delta has developed with our flight attendants works and is valued as an important part of the truly unique Delta culture,” said Delta spokeswoman Kate Modolo.
“We get that organizing attempts may continue because, let’s face it, dues from 20,000 people would be attractive to any union,” Modolo said. “But the IAM has a poor record in our industry and has been rejected by every work group it sought to represent following the Delta-Northwest merger.”
The United Auto Workers’ (UAW) initial failure to organize Volkswagen’s plant in Chattanooga, Tenn., in February led some to conclude that the last nail had been driven into the labor movement’s coffin in the South, but the diagnosis now seems premature.
UAW said this week that it has support from about half the plant’s 1,500 workers. It asked VW to let it negotiate for those workers.
Two weeks ago, 14,500 American agents — many based in the South — voted to join a Communication Workers of America/Teamsters coalition, which got 86% of the vote. Three-quarters of voters work in Texas, North Carolina, Florida and Arizona.
The new bargaining unit includes 9,000 agents from American, previously unrepresented, and 5,500 US Airways agents, already represented by the coalition. Teamsters represents former America West agents.
“It should not be lost on the pundits that most of the nearly 14,500 new union members work in southern states,” said AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka, in a prepared statement. “The right to a voice at work doesn’t have a geographic predisposition, and this victory will energize ongoing organizing efforts in the South.”
That's the way I read it too, 5% of your projected 2014 pay, which as you said, could be about 50% of your total profit sharing, the remainder to be paid on the normal Feb. 14th date.
Now I've got to wonder why?
Is this a move simply to pacify Wall Street, a little now, a little later, so the pay out next Feb. won't look so big and raise more questions like last time?
And what about that 4% raise? How you like'n that 3% now? Too bad you're not a "Front Line" employee!
Are the non-contract people talking Union again? That always gets them a small raise.
Maybe if WE talked about joining a Union, we could get better than a 3% raise too!
Now I've got to wonder why?
Is this a move simply to pacify Wall Street, a little now, a little later, so the pay out next Feb. won't look so big and raise more questions like last time?
And what about that 4% raise? How you like'n that 3% now? Too bad you're not a "Front Line" employee!
Are the non-contract people talking Union again? That always gets them a small raise.
Maybe if WE talked about joining a Union, we could get better than a 3% raise too!

I just came from the Council 1 meeting in MSP. They were talking about this as it was obviously just released today. This is a move to pacify Wall Street. The expectations are PS will be around double of last year. To me that means 14 to 16% so we are getting a 3rd of it early.
Not sure on why the Oct 3 rd date and such short notice but the PS to 401k question was brought up and the feeling was most pilots had filled their 401k by now.
Oh I didn't take any offense whatsoever. You are right, I have zero time in anything other than a jumpseat. The funny thing is that most of the "pros" I hear about the Airbus have to do with the tray table and size of the "office". I''m old school. I like needles that point to things. It was very hard for me to take the GPS navigation leap to fly the approach into Quito (which I have not done yet for real) with nothing but a pink line to follow. And really, I am not trying to get into an airplane versus bus argument. Personally, I feel that it was the design of the thing that led to the AF crash. I realize that it is a different way of thinking and "flying"... but I still challenge the bus drivers to convince me otherwise.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




