Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Subscribe
17234  17734  18134  18184  18224  18230  18231  18232  18233  18234  18235  18236  18237  18238  18244  18284  18334  18734  19234 
Page 18234 of 20173
Go to
Quote: 40%? Couldn't be. According to Carl, Scambo, PD etc "historically" retro is dated back to the contract amendable date. Surely if we fight for the next three years for a 46% raise+ status quo profit sharing, and no work rule givebacks, we'll also get a 100% 3 year retro check.
In our last (good) contract, year 2000, actually signed in summer of 2001, we did get full retroactive pay, for about 18 months of negotiations. I was a 757 Capt. at the time. My retro check was about $25,000, take home, after taxes, so YES, it can be done.
Quote: 40%? Couldn't be. According to Carl, Scambo, PD etc "historically" retro is dated back to the contract amendable date. Surely if we fight for the next three years for a 46% raise+ status quo profit sharing, and no work rule givebacks, we'll also get a 100% 3 year retro check.
Trip,
Please show me where I've ever mentioned retro anything.

You weren't here for the sacrifices that made this company what it is. You are riding coat tails and preaching. If I ever meet you in person, you will be the first new hire I didn't pick up the tab for.

There is a line, you are over it.
Quote: 40%? Couldn't be. According to Carl, Scambo, PD etc "historically" retro is dated back to the contract amendable date.
Brother, you are a piece of work. I invite you to find one solitary post where any one of the above posters has ever posted anything about "retro" pay.

When you don't find any, you can post your apology here.

As for me, I refuse to allow my expecations for C15 to be lowered by you and your ilk.
We don't need to give up ANYTHING!
Sailing, Alpha, Slow, Shiz. Since y'all seem to be in the know with management connections, I have a question. Supposedly RA is saying we don't fly enough and are not productive. How does the company calculate the sick leave used? Hours or days used. IE: call in sick for a 4 day and call in well 6 days later or 2 days into the 4 day trip? Also, I understand they don't like the amount of MIL leave guys are taking(personally know 2010 hires that have less than 200 hours as a Delta pilot). If they don't like this, why do they keep grabbing up the military guys that are still in the guard/reserve? Are they using the MIL leave added to the sick time(days not hours) to skew the productivity of the pilot group?
Quote: We rejected the CDOs in the FAR 117 LOA and got a better deal in 10 minutes.
Actually, not if you're on Reserve. One of the items lost in the second deal was to revert back to a 12-hr LC from a 13-hr LC. Another example of MEC infighting costing real pilots real QOL.

Which isn't to say we can't reject a deal, but I don't know of one precedent where a rejected TA yielded a better deal. Do you?
Quote: Sailing, Alpha, Slow, Shiz. Since y'all seem to be in the know with management connections, I have a question. Supposedly RA is saying we don't fly enough and are not productive. How does the company calculate the sick leave used? Hours or days used. IE: call in sick for a 4 day and call in well 6 days later or 2 days into the 4 day trip? Also, I understand they don't like the amount of MIL leave guys are taking(personally know 2010 hires that have less than 200 hours as a Delta pilot). If they don't like this, why do they keep grabbing up the military guys that are still in the guard/reserve? Are they using the MIL leave added to the sick time(days not hours) to skew the productivity of the pilot group?
And are they also using the training churn and redundant staffing for 10ish fleet types, which provides a revenue premium (or so they say), some of which are almost identical to each other, against our "productivity"?
Quote: Actually, not if you're on Reserve. One of the items lost in the second deal was to revert back to a 12-hr LC from a 13-hr LC. Another example of MEC infighting costing real pilot real QOL.

Which isn't to say we can't reject a deal, but I don't know of one precedent where a rejected TA yielded a better deal. Do you?
And the company feigned neutrality on CDO's laying blame at the MEC, yet when they were taken out we were penalized.
Quote: And the company feigned neutrality on CDO's laying blame at the MEC, yet when they were taken out we were penalized.
That's the price of dysfunction, isn't it?
Good point on the training/fleet productivity, btw.
17234  17734  18134  18184  18224  18230  18231  18232  18233  18234  18235  18236  18237  18238  18244  18284  18334  18734  19234 
Page 18234 of 20173
Go to