![]() |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 769597)
look at the cost to buy it back.
My Reps won't ask where it is at. Management says it doesn't exist and that they want to do Delta flying. So where's that cost I'm supposed to look at? L :eek: :eek: KING EVERYWHERE, haven't found it yet. You guys stop holding out on me. |
Anybody got the intel on two of our FAs getting into it in Rochester, refusing to fly with each other and the flight getting cnx? Some of my pax were talking about it today.
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 769513)
Pensions are dead. They need to let that one go because that ship has sailed, and it ain't coming back.
Small jet scope is dead. They need to let that one go because that ship has sailed, and it ain't coming back.:p You're smarter than that, Johnso. We shouldn't believe either one of the statements above.. Pensions don't have to be DB plans. |
Originally Posted by iaflyer
(Post 769602)
As much as I'd like to have DCI airplanes at mainline Delta, I can't see it happening - here's why:
Cost....The DCI airplanes right now are maintained by mechanics being are probably paid less than they are at Delta. The planes are dispatched using dispatchers who are paid less than Delta dispatchers. Cleaned by people making less than Delta cleaners (maybe, they might use the same people). The Flight attendants make less than Delta flight attendants. The gate agents are paid less than Delta gate agents. The cost of repairing the CRJ-900 would be at mainline Delta costs - not DCI costs. Same for dispatchers, cleaners, and flight attendants. So - the cost of dispatching, maintaining, serving drinks, etc on the former DCI plane go up, but the pilot cost would be the same. Republic has the same list flying Chautauqua, Shuttle America, MidWest, Republic across Certificates. We need to at least get a good handle on how that works. It seems to work well for them:
Originally Posted by Press Release Source: Republic Airways Holdings Inc.
Wednesday February 24, 2010, 6:54 pm EST INDIANAPOLIS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Republic Airways Holdings Inc. today reported operating revenues of $637.3 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, an 87.9% increase, compared to $339.3 million for the same period last year. Oh and Republic ordered 80 new narrow body "mainline" jets today. We wet ourselves over 2 777's and MD90's the Chinese don't want anymore. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 769599)
Yes, I know the guy that you are talking about. I beleive he is the Godfather of Newco. :eek:
|
What about defining the city pairs or city size that DCI could fly to. That way main line jets would fly to the larger city pairs leaving the RJs for the small cities that will not support a 100 seat airplane. Could be done on a population basis. that way we are not bringing the smaller jets onboard for DAL pilots to fly and mainline jets stopgetting replaced on big city pairs. THoughts?????
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 769543)
SECOND: D-ALPA has gone out of its way to avoid doing economic analysis on recovery. Even when it is their job to perform economic evaluation prior to entering bargaining, they have failed to do so. They aren't dumb. They avoid economic analysis on issues they do not want to confront. There is no way anyone can know "recovering the 76 seat flying would just cost too much" when no one has seriously studied it and no economic analysis has been done. If I'm wrong then put up the data to shut me up.
Your base statement is wrong. There have been multiple economic analyses done. They've been done by ALPA E&FA, by the Collective Bargaining committee, and by an outside financial advisor. The data isn't public, as I'm sure that you'd prefer we not solidly make management's points for them. But you're flat out wrong. You talk of job security. How many DCI pilots are on furlough? How many mainline pilots are on furlough? How many 76 seat jets can be added? How many greater than 50 seat jets can be added? |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 769606)
Small jet scope is dead. They need to let that one go because that ship has sailed, and it ain't coming back.:p
You're smarter than that, Johnso. We shouldn't believe either one of the statements above.. Pensions don't have to be DB plans. I think he meant pensions in the old form are dead.... and actually aren't something we should want. If it's not in my name, no thanks. Good points, though. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 769614)
Don Quixote, didn't we go through this last year? And the year before?
Your base statement is wrong. There have been multiple economic analyses done. They've been done by ALPA E&FA, by the Collective Bargaining committee, and by an outside financial advisor. The data isn't public, as I'm sure that you'd prefer we not solidly make management's points for them. But you're flat out wrong. You talk of job security. How many DCI pilots are on furlough? How many mainline pilots are on furlough? How many 76 seat jets can be added? How many greater than 50 seat jets can be added? I get it. You want protection underneath you (furlough fodder for yourself). Is that right? |
Originally Posted by keenster
(Post 769619)
I think that most of us do not like to see Rj's flying a city pair that used to be mainline. There is nothing wrong with that.
Originally Posted by keenster
(Post 769619)
To think in terms of furlough fodder is second grade dude. What do you want outsource everything????????
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:33 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands