Quote:
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
If the NC was made 4 pilots so it could be 2 and 2 for "damage control" then that is a massive failure of leadership. In fact it would just validate the divisive politics that marked the last few weeks. I don't care if the NC is north/south or whatever, I just want the best guys to go get me a contract. If compromises were made to satisfy petty politics then that is a failure of the MEC.
Ahhh, more leadership buzzwords. What's next? Some motivational posters on the crew room walls? That tired mantra and quotes out of the Boy Scout Leadership manual will get you nowhere with the north group other than snickered at for your naivete.
Besides, what failure? Pilots were unhappy with the way they were being represented. They sent a message to their reps. Their reps sent a message to the MEC officers.
If the message was received, then I'd call that great leadership, which, by the way, is not leading the pilot group around by the nose. Compromise is the nature of the beast.
The MEC saw a problem and they fixed it, or at least part of it. Problems the MEC officers were either unable or unwilling to come to grips with.
Fortunately, the message was sent loud and clear, and we got absolutely outstanding people on the committee, and I understand that the "front end" got the message, which was a nice bonus.
Sounds like pretty good leadership to me.
The process is that the NWA pilots had an issue with the agreement. They greived it. A process that has been subsumed by people who may not be so interested in letting it run its course. Fair enough. Step aside, and let those who want to pursue it do so. You can wash your hands of the whole thing and say "whelp, we told ya so" if the result you seem so sure of comes to pass. That would earn you a LOT of props.
But don't take managament's side. That is not helping your cause, and makes you look like a flaming DB.
Nu