Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search
Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-29-2008, 10:36 PM
  #3851  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Eck4Life's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 289
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow View Post
I think it's official. Neither pilot group is happy with the list. I guess the arbitrators did a good job.
That is the statement of the year. My friends keep asking me how it went and I tell them how much better it could have been and then I have to honestly tell them how much worse, also. I hang up the phone and realize they did a stand up job. Except for my portion of the list that is!!

Last edited by Eck4Life; 12-29-2008 at 10:51 PM.
Eck4Life is offline  
Old 12-29-2008, 10:48 PM
  #3852  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NuGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,839
Default

Heyas,

Using the "me too" argument for giving up the call in honest policy is pointless. If the DAL FAs want their own commuter policy, they are free to negotiate with management to get it...but OOPS, they can't, because they don't have a union.

Maybe that's one of the trade offs they can get to keep the union OFF the property...seems like DAL management can be pretty generous when it comes to representation vote time.

I, for one, am not interested in curtailing our own negotiating priorities in deference to a group that's not even interested in representing themselves. If they feel that management best represents their needs, then so be it.

Nu
NuGuy is offline  
Old 12-29-2008, 11:20 PM
  #3853  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy View Post
Heyas,

Using the "me too" argument for giving up the call in honest policy is pointless. If the DAL FAs want their own commuter policy, they are free to negotiate with management to get it...but OOPS, they can't, because they don't have a union.

Maybe that's one of the trade offs they can get to keep the union OFF the property...seems like DAL management can be pretty generous when it comes to representation vote time.

I, for one, am not interested in curtailing our own negotiating priorities in deference to a group that's not even interested in representing themselves. If they feel that management best represents their needs, then so be it.

Nu
Nu,

It's also kind of hard to make that argument when domestically the FA's don't even stay in the same hotels as the pilots. If that is the case and there is a reason for that, Old Delta guys chime in.
newKnow is offline  
Old 12-29-2008, 11:36 PM
  #3854  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy View Post
I, for one, am not interested in curtailing our own negotiating priorities in deference to a group that's not even interested in representing themselves.
That is dead on the money NuGuy. When the next contract comes up we'll have plenty of guys willing to curtail negotiating priorities because they are - well...puss!es. The last thing we need is further curtailing because we're worried about another group. Any group.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 12-29-2008, 11:42 PM
  #3855  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Barracuda,

Do you know for a fact that US Air management has not accepted the list? I don't know. There is a merged list at US Air that was the result of binding arbitration. Whether it has been accepted is another story. I believe the pilots from the separate groups don't fly with each other because there is no JCBA.

I think you are being a little niave (sp?) in thinking both merger committees could some how be "forced" to come to a negotiated list. How do you do that? At some point, sooner or later, there would be a merged list either thru negotiation or binding arbitration per ALPA policy/handbook or what ever you want to call it. Via the JCBA and the process agreement, both sides decided it would be better to get it done earlier and put it behind us.

I was very surprised by the lack of fences, as I'm sure alot of people were.

Ferd.......where's my scotch!?.........mad cow's kickin' in!

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 12-29-2008, 11:52 PM
  #3856  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

I haven't heard, does anyone know if Delta management has accepted the arbitrated list?

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 04:51 AM
  #3857  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: B76
Posts: 17
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane View Post
Barracuda,

Do you know for a fact that US Air management has not accepted the list? I don't know. There is a merged list at US Air that was the result of binding arbitration. Whether it has been accepted is another story. I believe the pilots from the separate groups don't fly with each other because there is no JCBA.

I think you are being a little niave (sp?) in thinking both merger committees could some how be "forced" to come to a negotiated list. How do you do that? At some point, sooner or later, there would be a merged list either thru negotiation or binding arbitration per ALPA policy/handbook or what ever you want to call it. Via the JCBA and the process agreement, both sides decided it would be better to get it done earlier and put it behind us.

I was very surprised by the lack of fences, as I'm sure alot of people were.

Ferd.......where's my scotch!?.........mad cow's kickin' in!

Denny
I tell you what, I talk to USAIR guys over the tracks quite a bit, and as of a few days ago, there is no AWA pilots flying to Europe. Somebody said "The end justifies the means". USAIR pilots still fly USAIR planes at their bases and routes. Too bad they can't get decent management on the property.
Barracuda is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 04:57 AM
  #3858  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,308
Default

Originally Posted by Barracuda View Post
Not a good example, but I believe AWA and USAIR never merged their seniority list because itwas not accepted by USAIR!! Last time I checked they were both ALPA

The SLI should never have gone to binding arbitration. Our ALPA reps should've been forced to negotiate something reasonable for both groups. I don't think you noticed, but the award is quite simple, relative seniority, 99.9 percent of pilots are within +-2% of their pre-merger percentage. 5-10 year fences would've prevented all this mess. Green book, red book, or whatever you want to call it would've been just fine for everybody but you, off course
Barracuda, Again you are wrong. The USAIR list was accepted by management at USAIR right after ALPA presented it to them. It is the seniority list at USAIR. The Delta list has also been excepted by Delta management.
USAIR is still flying split operations because they don't have a joint contract. The USAIR pilots are still flying under their original contract and make less then the America West pilots. Until they sign a joint contract their operations can't be integrated. USAIR pilots are making the lowest wages in the industry.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 05:20 AM
  #3859  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
The last thing we need is further curtailing because we're worried about another group. Any group.

Carl
THAT would be a dramatic shift around here.. but I hope it occurs.
tsquare is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 05:21 AM
  #3860  
Pog Ma Hoin
 
Adolphus Coors's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: 7ER B
Posts: 208
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow View Post
Nu,

It's also kind of hard to make that argument when domestically the FA's don't even stay in the same hotels as the pilots. If that is the case and there is a reason for that, Old Delta guys chime in.

DAL FAs are not restricted by the same rest and max hours requirements pilots are. As a result they fly rotations that are more productive and they tend to have much shorter rest periods then we do. This causes them to be placed into the airport layover location rather than the downtown layover location. If they are on a long layover or have the same layover as the pilots they are very very likely laying over in the same hotel as us.

When I first asked the same question you did I was told a group of DAL pilot wifes had gotten upset by the behavior of their spouses on layovers and asked the company to have us layover separately. After doing some more digging I concluded it was more then likely because FAs would rather be more productive than layover with the pilots.
Adolphus Coors is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices