Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Slow,
Can you dumb this down a little for me please? I'm reading Sec 3.I Profit Sharing Plan. It says the payout calculation is based on PTIX which is pre-tax income levels, right? So if the company makes $0-2.5 billion then 15% of the PTIX is paid.
Does that mean 15% goes to the pilot group, & then the pilots split that 15%? Is our individual shares then based on PTIX, or is split evenly among all pilots?
Thanks for putting it in simple terms.
Can you dumb this down a little for me please? I'm reading Sec 3.I Profit Sharing Plan. It says the payout calculation is based on PTIX which is pre-tax income levels, right? So if the company makes $0-2.5 billion then 15% of the PTIX is paid.
Does that mean 15% goes to the pilot group, & then the pilots split that 15%? Is our individual shares then based on PTIX, or is split evenly among all pilots?
Thanks for putting it in simple terms.

Remember also that while it's called "profit sharing", it's actually pre-tax income sharing. Those write downs (among others) that ACL mentioned earlier in the thread are specifically excluded from the calculation.
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
If you look through the table that shows the profit sharing plan, you'll see that it is for all employees. Incomes are totaled (with the exclusions in the definitions), then each employee is paid their percentage based on their income to the total pool. Pilots are a little more than 1/3 of the income pool. Everyone sees the same percentage increase to their income, and then DC contributions are made on that additional money.
Remember also that while it's called "profit sharing", it's actually pre-tax income sharing. Those write downs (among others) that ACL mentioned earlier in the thread are specifically excluded from the calculation.
Remember also that while it's called "profit sharing", it's actually pre-tax income sharing. Those write downs (among others) that ACL mentioned earlier in the thread are specifically excluded from the calculation.
Nice job getting that written in. Thanks for the explanation.
It's certainly possible I could have misinterpreted the statements. But I do not "make stuff up". Can you give an example where I have?
BTW, I noticed you conveniently left off the following quote from my post: (Talking about profit sharing) "As you can see, it's not even a drop in the proverbial bucket!" Do you agree with that statement or not?
From Sheilus to the reefs of Kizmar
From Stargate and the Outer Worlds
They're speeding towards our sun
They're on a party run
Here come Tomorrow's Girls
Tomorrow's Girls
- Donald Fagan from Kamakiriad
Not to pick another fight but the Master Chairman stated that the "Profit Sharing" is there to help us capture some of the highly profitable periods like we had after POS 96. Not sure if that was summarized as restoration. It is more of a check valve type compensation that turns off automatically when the company is not profitable.
My undergrad degree is in Biz Management with an emphasis in Personnel Administration (now called human resources), I don't remember much but I do remember a discussion about profit sharing during wage and salary class.
Basically, profit sharing is a con job (my words not the professor's)to make you feel more a part of the organization. You work hard so the organization does well and you get a little something for your efforts.
However, once you do expenses (glad our's is on operational....NWA wasn't and it was a REAL con job) the amount is so diluted that it can backfire. IE, when you get your profit sharing check you go ****! I honestly believe you're better off using your negotiating capital on the salary side. Gives you more to "give back" in the bad times
.
Ferd <----------BUT, yes of course I'll take the check
Basically, profit sharing is a con job (my words not the professor's)to make you feel more a part of the organization. You work hard so the organization does well and you get a little something for your efforts.
However, once you do expenses (glad our's is on operational....NWA wasn't and it was a REAL con job) the amount is so diluted that it can backfire. IE, when you get your profit sharing check you go ****! I honestly believe you're better off using your negotiating capital on the salary side. Gives you more to "give back" in the bad times
.Ferd <----------BUT, yes of course I'll take the check
My undergrad degree is in Biz Management with an emphasis in Personnel Administration (now called human resources), I don't remember much but I do remember a discussion about profit sharing during wage and salary class.
Basically, profit sharing is a con job (my words not the professor's)to make you feel more a part of the organization. You work hard so the organization does well and you get a little something for your efforts.
However, once you do expenses (glad our's is on operational....NWA wasn't and it was a REAL con job) the amount is so diluted that it can backfire. IE, when you get your profit sharing check you go ****! I honestly believe you're better off using your negotiating capital on the salary side. Gives you more to "give back" in the bad times
.
Ferd <----------BUT, yes of course I'll take the check
Basically, profit sharing is a con job (my words not the professor's)to make you feel more a part of the organization. You work hard so the organization does well and you get a little something for your efforts.
However, once you do expenses (glad our's is on operational....NWA wasn't and it was a REAL con job) the amount is so diluted that it can backfire. IE, when you get your profit sharing check you go ****! I honestly believe you're better off using your negotiating capital on the salary side. Gives you more to "give back" in the bad times
.Ferd <----------BUT, yes of course I'll take the check

Con job or not we have it.
These are the type of "circuit breaker" compensation programs that companies like. They have triggers like this ones does to be shut off when things go South. The mindset seems to be that, if they automatically shutoff there will not be a stronger need for concessions in the bad times.
Simply, if you do not like them tell your reps. If you do, tell your reps!
Con job or not we have it.
These are the type of "circuit breaker" compensation programs that companies like. They have triggers like this ones does to be shut off when things go South. The mindset seems to be that, if they automatically shutoff there will not be a stronger need for concessions in the bad times.
Simply, if you do not like them tell your reps. If you do, tell your reps!
These are the type of "circuit breaker" compensation programs that companies like. They have triggers like this ones does to be shut off when things go South. The mindset seems to be that, if they automatically shutoff there will not be a stronger need for concessions in the bad times.
Simply, if you do not like them tell your reps. If you do, tell your reps!

May I call you A?
I am Mr Fernando Matobo, ESQ, and I have found you to be a relative of Mr Binzillion ACL, a banker from the Republic of Haiti. He has not been seen since the unfortunate earthquake of last year.
Sir, I'm writing you to see if you may be interested in recovering a portion of his estate

Mr Fernando Matobo ESQ
You are good there Ferd. Not interested in your billions! So, sorry
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From: A320 CA
A quick question about non-reving on payload optimized flights...
How do you know if it's payload optimized prior to showing up? My family tried to non-rev on 1468 SAN-CVG last night the flight had tons of seats and they left non-revs behind. This morning flight 9862 shows over eighty seats available but they have such bad luck out of SAN that I'm not even sure they should try. Are the 320's performance restricted due to the short runway with 4 hours of gas?
How do you know if it's payload optimized prior to showing up? My family tried to non-rev on 1468 SAN-CVG last night the flight had tons of seats and they left non-revs behind. This morning flight 9862 shows over eighty seats available but they have such bad luck out of SAN that I'm not even sure they should try. Are the 320's performance restricted due to the short runway with 4 hours of gas?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




