Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 06-28-2010 | 01:32 PM
  #41931  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Slow,

Can you dumb this down a little for me please? I'm reading Sec 3.I Profit Sharing Plan. It says the payout calculation is based on PTIX which is pre-tax income levels, right? So if the company makes $0-2.5 billion then 15% of the PTIX is paid.

Does that mean 15% goes to the pilot group, & then the pilots split that 15%? Is our individual shares then based on PTIX, or is split evenly among all pilots?

Thanks for putting it in simple terms.
If you look through the table that shows the profit sharing plan, you'll see that it is for all employees. Incomes are totaled (with the exclusions in the definitions), then each employee is paid their percentage based on their income to the total pool. Pilots are a little more than 1/3 of the income pool. Everyone sees the same percentage increase to their income, and then DC contributions are made on that additional money.

Remember also that while it's called "profit sharing", it's actually pre-tax income sharing. Those write downs (among others) that ACL mentioned earlier in the thread are specifically excluded from the calculation.
Old 06-28-2010 | 01:40 PM
  #41932  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
If you look through the table that shows the profit sharing plan, you'll see that it is for all employees. Incomes are totaled (with the exclusions in the definitions), then each employee is paid their percentage based on their income to the total pool. Pilots are a little more than 1/3 of the income pool. Everyone sees the same percentage increase to their income, and then DC contributions are made on that additional money.

Remember also that while it's called "profit sharing", it's actually pre-tax income sharing. Those write downs (among others) that ACL mentioned earlier in the thread are specifically excluded from the calculation.



Nice job getting that written in. Thanks for the explanation.
Old 06-28-2010 | 01:47 PM
  #41933  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Which DALPA official made this statement and when?

Or are you making stuff up again?
I have seen several statements from several different DALPA officials over several years (mostly on the DALPA Forum) that led me to believe they view profit sharing as a significant part of restoration. These comments were usually in response to someone who suggested we were not making any significant progress. Nobody came out and said that profit sharing is everything. Their comments just gave me the impression they consider it a lot more significant than the math actually shows.

It's certainly possible I could have misinterpreted the statements. But I do not "make stuff up". Can you give an example where I have?

BTW, I noticed you conveniently left off the following quote from my post: (Talking about profit sharing) "As you can see, it's not even a drop in the proverbial bucket!" Do you agree with that statement or not?
Old 06-28-2010 | 01:54 PM
  #41934  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Razor
Speaking of hats, I'm in Kiev now and let me tell ya', nobody where's a hat like the former Soviet Union boys do. Some of them have hats so big they can fit two emblems on the front. It makes my Delta hat look tiny by comparison
You are in KBP... on a layover.. and online in the forum. Boy you are an EPIC FAILURE at layover... EPIC...


From Sheilus to the reefs of Kizmar
From Stargate and the Outer Worlds
They're speeding towards our sun
They're on a party run
Here come Tomorrow's Girls
Tomorrow's Girls

- Donald Fagan from Kamakiriad
Old 06-28-2010 | 01:58 PM
  #41935  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Not to pick another fight but the Master Chairman stated that the "Profit Sharing" is there to help us capture some of the highly profitable periods like we had after POS 96. Not sure if that was summarized as restoration. It is more of a check valve type compensation that turns off automatically when the company is not profitable.
Old 06-28-2010 | 01:58 PM
  #41936  
Ferd149's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: LAX ERA
Default

My undergrad degree is in Biz Management with an emphasis in Personnel Administration (now called human resources), I don't remember much but I do remember a discussion about profit sharing during wage and salary class.

Basically, profit sharing is a con job (my words not the professor's)to make you feel more a part of the organization. You work hard so the organization does well and you get a little something for your efforts.

However, once you do expenses (glad our's is on operational....NWA wasn't and it was a REAL con job) the amount is so diluted that it can backfire. IE, when you get your profit sharing check you go ****! I honestly believe you're better off using your negotiating capital on the salary side. Gives you more to "give back" in the bad times.

Ferd <----------BUT, yes of course I'll take the check
Old 06-28-2010 | 02:10 PM
  #41937  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149
My undergrad degree is in Biz Management with an emphasis in Personnel Administration (now called human resources), I don't remember much but I do remember a discussion about profit sharing during wage and salary class.

Basically, profit sharing is a con job (my words not the professor's)to make you feel more a part of the organization. You work hard so the organization does well and you get a little something for your efforts.

However, once you do expenses (glad our's is on operational....NWA wasn't and it was a REAL con job) the amount is so diluted that it can backfire. IE, when you get your profit sharing check you go ****! I honestly believe you're better off using your negotiating capital on the salary side. Gives you more to "give back" in the bad times.

Ferd <----------BUT, yes of course I'll take the check

Con job or not we have it.

These are the type of "circuit breaker" compensation programs that companies like. They have triggers like this ones does to be shut off when things go South. The mindset seems to be that, if they automatically shutoff there will not be a stronger need for concessions in the bad times.

Simply, if you do not like them tell your reps. If you do, tell your reps!
Old 06-28-2010 | 02:16 PM
  #41938  
Ferd149's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: LAX ERA
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Con job or not we have it.

These are the type of "circuit breaker" compensation programs that companies like. They have triggers like this ones does to be shut off when things go South. The mindset seems to be that, if they automatically shutoff there will not be a stronger need for concessions in the bad times.

Simply, if you do not like them tell your reps. If you do, tell your reps!
Dr Mr ACL,

May I call you A?

I am Mr Fernando Matobo, ESQ, and I have found you to be a relative of Mr Binzillion ACL, a banker from the Republic of Haiti. He has not been seen since the unfortunate earthquake of last year.

Sir, I'm writing you to see if you may be interested in recovering a portion of his estate

Mr Fernando Matobo ESQ
Old 06-28-2010 | 02:23 PM
  #41939  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

You are good there Ferd. Not interested in your billions! So, sorry
Old 06-28-2010 | 02:27 PM
  #41940  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Dirty
A quick question about non-reving on payload optimized flights...

How do you know if it's payload optimized prior to showing up? My family tried to non-rev on 1468 SAN-CVG last night the flight had tons of seats and they left non-revs behind. This morning flight 9862 shows over eighty seats available but they have such bad luck out of SAN that I'm not even sure they should try. Are the 320's performance restricted due to the short runway with 4 hours of gas?
Delta seems to carry a LOT of gas. I've never been restricted before from SAN-DTW, shouldn't be a problem SAN-CVG
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices