![]() |
Originally Posted by JobHopper
(Post 864918)
I have not watched the video. You're right; if that is the procedure it wil tie up space (unnecessarily, IMO).
|
80 American does it that way :D
|
FWIW, a lie flat seat can command a lot more money that a BE. In fact check out carriers that have em. Most tickets are in the 10-15K range.
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 864930)
I flew with a former CLCP a few trips ago... he said he fought this tooth and nails, but the direction came from wayyyy high up. I don't like it when the big wigs get involved, they always screw stuff up because they don't fly the line.
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 864930)
I flew with a former CLCP a few trips ago... he said he fought this tooth and nails, but the direction came from wayyyy high up. I don't like it when the big wigs get involved, they always screw stuff up because they don't fly the line.
Stopping a taxi and setting the brakes? Really? In NY, LA, ORD or ATL? Yeah, that'll work. NOT a good idea.:mad: |
Well in reality, we start engines on taxi which as the FO eyes in so doing numbers with a brake set is not a reach. CAPT may have to input numbers as the FO is starting the engine, but it should work.
I say do not sweat it. ;) |
Originally Posted by buzzpat
(Post 864940)
I agree. I don't mind pushing without the numbers. Do it often and, of course, there's always runway changes, etc, where we're rolling and working the FMS magic like Liberace on an organ (well, maybe not an organ :eek:).
Stopping a taxi and setting the brakes? Really? In NY, LA, ORD or ATL? Yeah, that'll work. NOT a good idea.:mad: It also means time management and discretion. Many of these money lines give us ample time. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 864936)
FWIW, a lie flat seat can command a lot more money that a BE. In fact check out carriers that have em. Most tickets are in the 10-15K range.
|
This new WDR procedure is going to increase our fuel burns, too. A lot of crews are just going to start two engines to keep the taxi workload down. Also, we're going to be stopped with engine(s) running while inputting WDR data and running checklists instead of doing it at the gate with everything shutdown. In my opinion, this is just plain stupid. Our previous procedures weren't broke, so why "fix" them?
Also, on the -88, I can count on one hand the amount of departures we've delayed because the numbers weren't ready. I don't see where the problem is. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 864942)
It also means time management and discretion. Many of these money lines give us ample time.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:07 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands