Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
On Reserve
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 14
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Add to that, the current system is in the best interest of most pilots. Pick what is important to you....chase quality of life or chase the money.
![Michael70776 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/clear.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Seniority is bidding power, and longevity is buying power. Any airline that has had a merger that used anything besides category/status and or furloughs has this.
Guys that bypass furlough will enjoy better biding power with their seniority that they keep, but may have less longevity than a guy below them, so they get paid at a lower hourly rate for the same work. That is not the hurdle.
*Not supporting this type of system, but pointing out a fact.
![acl65pilot is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
There is probably more than a couple of different compensation revamp options available to the pilot group that would be beneficial to some and detrimental to others.
Longevity pay would be make some happy and make others upset. While I do agree that the system now has become a little over-complicated with so many different aircraft types and categories, the bottom line is it would be impractical, if not impossible, to create a system that will be beneficial everybody.
The point is it is impractical to think that we will be able to devise a compensation program that will be beneficial to everyone. Not saying we shouldn't be considering ways to improve compensation, but I think venturing on a project such as this will require a significant amount of collateral contract changes that we may not anticipate.
Managements is extremely versed in it's ability to work a PWA into a way that is beneficial to them and detrimental to us.
Face the facts they are better at it then we are.
Coming into a the first few profitable quarters after a 10 year stint of ongoing losses, while still working under a bankruptcy contract, begs at least one question in my mind:
How "creative" do we really want to get approaching the 2012 contract?
Longevity pay would be make some happy and make others upset. While I do agree that the system now has become a little over-complicated with so many different aircraft types and categories, the bottom line is it would be impractical, if not impossible, to create a system that will be beneficial everybody.
The point is it is impractical to think that we will be able to devise a compensation program that will be beneficial to everyone. Not saying we shouldn't be considering ways to improve compensation, but I think venturing on a project such as this will require a significant amount of collateral contract changes that we may not anticipate.
Managements is extremely versed in it's ability to work a PWA into a way that is beneficial to them and detrimental to us.
Face the facts they are better at it then we are.
Coming into a the first few profitable quarters after a 10 year stint of ongoing losses, while still working under a bankruptcy contract, begs at least one question in my mind:
How "creative" do we really want to get approaching the 2012 contract?
![DeadHead is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: 320B
Posts: 781
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This type of pay system has been looked at many times. There was a excellent letter that was about 2 pages long that talked of all the pros and cons of going to this type of system. I wish I still had a copy of the letter because there were lots of issues that most would not even think about that it causes. The one interesting conclusion was that it would not reduce overall training nearly as much as most people believe. The total training reduction was expected to only be in the 15 to 20 percent range. In addition you would have to rebid the system. That rebid would create a massive training load over 2 to 3 year period. It also of course eliminates all pay raises from new equipment. I was at first interested as it would have benefited but after reading a well researched letter and talking with a few others it became clear that the current system is flawed but better.
![1234 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,953
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What airline code is RS on travelnet? What priority does RS travel on an ASA flight? I know I'm an S3C on an ASA flight.
![hockeypilot44 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: 757/767
Posts: 193
![Thrust Normal is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What is the difference between a Authorized Personal Drop and a Personal Drop? From section 23, it is not real clear what the "authorized" means. The benefit is that the APD is run before the APD and the limit is one per year, with more than 25% reserve coverage.
Is my read on this correct?
Is my read on this correct?
![Jabberwock is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Changing the pay system will not change the amount of money Delta can spend on the pilots. The amount spent on the pilot contract will be the same no matter what pay system we have. So how are you going to swith to longevity pay without screwing some pilots while rewarding others?
Add to that, the current system is in the best interest of most pilots. Pick what is important to you....chase quality of life or chase the money.
Add to that, the current system is in the best interest of most pilots. Pick what is important to you....chase quality of life or chase the money.
The way I would implement a longevity system would be to take the lowest paid captain DC9 at 12 year.. and find an acceptable raise from that point. That becomes year 1 of the longevity scale. Every year after that is a (3%) raise until year 40. How would anybody get "screwed" there?
OK.. why do we need make a choice about choosing money or QOL. That is defeatist. You essentially are saying that we cannot have both, so we have to make a choice. Really? I don't buy that because there are no more benefits of real consequence so the remaining two have to be paired against each other? Like I have said, I know I am tilting at windmills because there won't be any original thinking on how this is all done. $500 for the whale.. they deserve it!
Can't never could do anything...
![tsquare is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,012
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My solution is the opposite. We should have separate categories for paint jobs, winglets, galley configurations, engine dash numbers, lav floor cover color and anything else we can think of. That way we all can be senior on something
![Smile](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Bucking Bar is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What is the difference between a Authorized Personal Drop and a Personal Drop? From section 23, it is not real clear what the "authorized" means. The benefit is that the APD is run before the APD and the limit is one per year, with more than 25% reserve coverage.
Is my read on this correct?
Is my read on this correct?
The idea behind the APD was that with the reserve days almost always capped, if something important is going on at home and you really need the days off, you can use an APD to get that. If it falls over a holiday, like Jan 1, then Skeds can decline to drop the trip even if coverage is good enough for an APD.
That said, if you have a medical issue or treatment you need to take care of, a family event such as a graduation or marriage, you can always ask your C.P. for the time off, he has the ability to call skeds and have them drop a trip. If you go that route, don't be surprised if he asks you to white slip something else or pick up another trip in the month especially if your category is short of pilots. I don't know why some C.P.'s ask that, but they often do. Sometimes C.P.'s will cover those sorts of drops with your vacation time, so you kind of get paid (vacation pay) -- if you don't want that to happen, make sure you communicate that to them.
You can check the contract for more details about the APD. It's not as useful as it once was, and it will probably cost you money to use. But basically it's there if something comes up and you don't have any other way of being off work... Cough Cough.
If you have a family emergency, ie: a death, your C.P. will authorize up to 4 paid days off, S-1 passes, to deal with that issue, all you need to do in that case is make a phone call.
![flyallnite is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post