Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search
Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-2011, 05:20 PM
  #58521  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,928
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1 View Post
It might have been unintentional, but you just took me back to the ALPA magazine cover that had the Midwest MEC Chair on the cover...all smiles as they were closing the doors.
ALPA celebrated the last Midwest flight. To this day, I still can't believe that.
hockeypilot44 is offline  
Old 02-01-2011, 05:24 PM
  #58522  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
Exactly. Oh and they are good for the mainline. And we will get a solid no furlough clause. And if we grow they can add more, but if we shrink they get to keep them. Maybe we can go up to 84 seats, which is just an E190 with first class. It will give us a competitive advantage! Weeeeeee!

ALPA/DALPA must prove to the membership that they are serious about scope. The epic fails of the past must not be repeated.
This is so important. No furlough clauses are the carrots used by management/ALPA to get buy in from the junior pilots for Scope cave-ins. Increased pay is what they use for the senior pilots. Junior pilots CANNOT buy in to no furlough clauses for Scope sales.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 02-01-2011, 05:28 PM
  #58523  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1 View Post
Vote no on anything without scope recapture.

Most of us are realistic enough to realize DALPA will put some thing (scope) concessionary in front of us. It is up to us to turn it down.
How can this be Scambo?? Most of the unionoids here consistently state that our reps will never agree to any more Scope concessions. They won't put it in writing, but unionoids are sure about what they've heard from our reps.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 02-01-2011, 06:11 PM
  #58524  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,873
Default

Lets look at the bright side - remember the Christmas movie with Jimmy Stewart - A wonderful Life?

Every time a bell rings an Angel would get their wings.

Every time there is another Delta outsourcing event the DPA gets a new card.

Before all the ALPA defenders pounce on this statement - I am not necessarily for replacing ALPA - but a decent conversation about it, is probably warranted.

Additionally, this kind of thing certainly does raise issues about RJs being self limiting - they are not. They are Scope limited - period. Any weakness in Scope will be exploited to the full extent possible by a management that is apparently still mesmerized by outsourcing to the competition.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 02-01-2011, 06:13 PM
  #58525  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop View Post
They are Scope limited - period. Any weakness in Scope will be exploited to the full extent possible by a management that is apparently still mesmerized by outsourcing to the competition.

Scoop
We are foolish to believe anything else. Keep this in mind as negotiations are just around the corner.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 02-01-2011, 06:21 PM
  #58526  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Starboard Side, weekends & holidays.
Posts: 850
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 View Post
ALPA celebrated the last Midwest flight. To this day, I still can't believe that.
This!!!! I get ill every time I fly into Milwaukee. Instead of hanging their heads in shame at failing a member group, they turned it into a full color glossy on the magazine. Although it had nothing to do with Delta, that was the day I completely lost faith in ALPA.
FmrFreightDog is offline  
Old 02-01-2011, 06:47 PM
  #58527  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 2,152
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1 View Post
So, why doesn't the Master Chairman publicly write a comprehensive policy for scope recapture?
I went to the Council 44 meeting today and heard TO speak. I will say that I left convinced that he is aware of the scope threats to our profession. It was emphasized that a large threat (and he's right) are the gov't subsidized, soon-to-be MEGA middle-eastern carriers.

He did not infer or even approach re-capturing RJ scope. The presentation was more of a "let's look at the biggest threat going forward" [quotes mine] vs. spinning our wheels working for something we already have: a limit on large RJ's that is almost met, albeit frustrating and far too generous.

Don't get me wrong. I'm sick everytime I see a 175 at a mainline gate; both for us and for the crews stuck flying there that would prefer to be here. We certainly need to shore up some of the language regarding allowing ANY more RJ's regardless of the mainline fleet count. However, I DO want my elected reps to be looking over the horizon for the NEXT threats, which the new guys seem to be doing so far.

I'm rambling, but my point is I don't want to be so focused on the left hand (RJ's) that the right hand (JV's, Codeshares, Cabotage, younameit) slaps us without even seeing it coming. Unless we relax RJ scope, at least it is where it is for now. If we can tighten it up, or recapture, so much the better.

This is not to say we shouldn't work towards insourcing OUR flying by convincing mgmt to stop signing/renewing these DCI contracts and let them eventually expire, but we shouldn't let the RJ issue cloud our awareness of some of these other very big, very real threats to our job protections.

Also, I hope we eventually acquire/merge with Alaska, because that's whole 'nuther problem that noone but the west coast guys seem to care about.

Oh yeah, and the Midwest situation was/is a f*#&ing travesty! That is all
LeineLodge is offline  
Old 02-01-2011, 07:07 PM
  #58528  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Start-up Airline Business Plan 101

DO NOT try and buy new A320s or B737s and launch a new ultra low cost carrier that is heavily reliant on flying routes where other airlines did not have direct flights and flying to secondary airports rather than heavily-trafficked ones and doing cheesy stuff like selling advertising space on the interior and exterior of its aircraft as well as selling merchandise on board.

DO buy a small fleet of cheep regional jets. Fly for a mainline carrier and get a contract where you're guaranteed a profit for each departure and you don't pay for fuel. To show good faith accept whatever base they request and call that a hub and make the pilots live there (like NYC), pay everyone really low wages and skimp on training and maintenance. One day take your small fortune and buy bigger jets and compete with the mainline carrier completely funding your new airline with a long term contract signed with the mainline carrier who probably won't even notice what you're doing. Their pilots may complain but nobody listens to them anyways. Heck, make sure your pilots join their union! It'll neuter them both.

It's simple, it's cheap, everyone who is anyone is doing it.

That ends today's lesson in Start-Up Airline Business Plan 101.

forgot to bid is offline  
Old 02-01-2011, 07:14 PM
  #58529  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge View Post
I went to the Council 44 meeting today and heard TO speak. I will say that I left convinced that he is aware of the scope threats to our profession. It was emphasized that a large threat (and he's right) are the gov't subsidized, soon-to-be MEGA middle-eastern carriers.

He did not infer or even approach re-capturing RJ scope. The presentation was more of a "let's look at the biggest threat going forward" [quotes mine] vs. spinning our wheels working for something we already have: a limit on large RJ's that is almost met, albeit frustrating and far too generous.

Don't get me wrong. I'm sick everytime I see a 175 at a mainline gate; both for us and for the crews stuck flying there that would prefer to be here. We certainly need to shore up some of the language regarding allowing ANY more RJ's regardless of the mainline fleet count. However, I DO want my elected reps to be looking over the horizon for the NEXT threats, which the new guys seem to be doing so far.

I'm rambling, but my point is I don't want to be so focused on the left hand (RJ's) that the right hand (JV's, Codeshares, Cabotage, younameit) slaps us without even seeing it coming. Unless we relax RJ scope, at least it is where it is for now. If we can tighten it up, or recapture, so much the better.

This is not to say we shouldn't work towards insourcing OUR flying by convincing mgmt to stop signing/renewing these DCI contracts and let them eventually expire, but we shouldn't let the RJ issue cloud our awareness of some of these other very big, very real threats to our job protections.

Also, I hope we eventually acquire/merge with Alaska, because that's whole 'nuther problem that noone but the west coast guys seem to care about.

Oh yeah, and the Midwest situation was/is a f*#&ing travesty! That is all
I think we can walk and chew gum at the same time.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 02-01-2011, 07:26 PM
  #58530  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1 View Post
So, why doesn't the Master Chairman publicly write a comprehensive policy for scope recapture?
Because he doesn't believe we should. Period! He will grudgingly go along if we force it by overwhelming pressure from a majority of us.

Bottom line is that he doesn't see our current Scope as a problem.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices