Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2011 | 08:09 AM
  #61971  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
You don't think that, if you remove the financial incentives to fly a larger airplane, people would pick flying closer to home, or flying that's less tiring, etc.? I think our category lists are very much influenced by money. It's not the sole incentive, but it's a major incentive. Some individuals go against this trend, but in the aggregate, there it is: the higher paying categories are senior. You can validate this by looking at airlines such as British Airways where (I believe) there is no financial incentive to fly larger airplanes, and the senior guys are flying shorter NB trips.
I've heard countless times that long haul flying affords a higher QOL and is less stressful than 4 day, 15 leg, 22-hour DC-9/MD-88/90 trips.
What happens to pay rates if the Company decides to park widebodies? It's a way for them to control payscales.
Finally, if BA has a longevity pay system, let's get feedback from their pilot group as to how it's working over there. Or has dalpa already had in depth discussions with them to see if it is something which makes sense?
Old 03-17-2011 | 08:09 AM
  #61972  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Really ACL? And my point is strictly one sided. Good grief, I think it is time for me to cuss somebody out and get banished from this board.
As I see it, the point being made is, all categories would be really senior, then really junior allowing less downbids and backfilling to furlough. You could uniformly cut capacity across the board with less of an effect wrt to cost and training. The flex would be much easier to manage for the company than the current pay system.

APA has new hires on the whale, we do not. Pay is the reason guys sit reserve on it when they can hold better trips on lower paying jets. Take that away and really junior pilots will get to fly the 744/777 as those guys that are currently doing no longer have a pay incentive.
Old 03-17-2011 | 08:18 AM
  #61973  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
IOW, much better to have a crappy QOL your entire career.. got it.
I thought you weren't discussing this anymore?

I wasn't making a value judgement on either system, but I was answering Columbia's question. I'm pretty sure people are driven by money towards higher-paying categories, which forces them to make QOL compromises. I think you and I agree on this point. And this is a pro-LBP observation. You do have some valid points, after all. There are other reasons I think LBP is not a great idea, but I wasn't debating them here. And neither one of us is saying 744's will be parked. But you said, in the context of that hypothetical, that it should show us all the value of a LBP system. Ufortunately, your timing is poor: it's pretty obvious that a LBP, by allowing people to distribute more evenly based on QOL decisions, would actualy create a less "stovepipe-like" environment where it would be easy to curtail flying, either fleet-by-fleet, or system-wide. And it would be a cinch to furlough, because the distribution of junior pilots would be more even across fleets.
Old 03-17-2011 | 08:24 AM
  #61974  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot

APA has new hires on the whale, we do not. Pay is the reason guys sit reserve on it when they can hold better trips on lower paying jets. Take that away and really junior pilots will get to fly the 744/777 as those guys that are currently doing no longer have a pay incentive.
Who's APA? American? If so, every junior pilot (read:12 year+ seniority/longevity) is on the -80 on reserve. Same with UAL and US. The only thing a 12+ year junior pilots can hold at each of these companies is reserve on the smallest/lowest paying plane they have. The current system certainly didn't stop them from furloughing.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't junior pilots at each of those Co's be paid more as their pay were based on longevity? They are now and have been effectively stuck at narrowbody pay scales for years. Thx-just trying to truly understand both arguments.
Old 03-17-2011 | 08:27 AM
  #61975  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
As I see it, the point being made is, all categories would be really senior, then really junior allowing less downbids and backfilling to furlough. You could uniformly cut capacity across the board with less of an effect wrt to cost and training. The flex would be much easier to manage for the company than the current pay system.

APA has new hires on the whale, we do not. Pay is the reason guys sit reserve on it when they can hold better trips on lower paying jets. Take that away and really junior pilots will get to fly the 744/777 as those guys that are currently doing no longer have a pay incentive.
I am asking the most junior guy on this board right now: Since it is apparent that there will be no hiring for the forseeable future, would you like to have the potential opportunity to be able to fly the 777/747/330/7ER... on reserve.. as you are now... or would you rather be shoehorned into the DC9 right seat.. like you are now? Yup.. QOL might be the same.. but opportunity might be better for that guy. It's not ALL about the money.. but I could be wrong.
Old 03-17-2011 | 08:28 AM
  #61976  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Columbia
Who's APA? American? If so, every junior pilot (read:12 year+ seniority/longevity) is on the -80 on reserve. Same with UAL and US. The only thing a 12+ year junior pilots can hold at each of these companies is reserve on the smallest/lowest paying plane they have. The current system certainly didn't stop them from furloughing.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't junior pilots at each of those Co's be paid more as their pay were based on longevity? They are now and have been effectively stuck at narrowbody pay scales for years. Thx-just trying to truly understand both arguments.

Yessir, you betcha.
Old 03-17-2011 | 08:33 AM
  #61977  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
I thought you weren't discussing this anymore?

I wasn't making a value judgement on either system, but I was answering Columbia's question. I'm pretty sure people are driven by money towards higher-paying categories, which forces them to make QOL compromises. I think you and I agree on this point. And this is a pro-LBP observation. You do have some valid points, after all. There are other reasons I think LBP is not a great idea, but I wasn't debating them here. And neither one of us is saying 744's will be parked. But you said, in the context of that hypothetical, that it should show us all the value of a LBP system. Ufortunately, your timing is poor: it's pretty obvious that a LBP, by allowing people to distribute more evenly based on QOL decisions, would actualy create a less "stovepipe-like" environment where it would be easy to curtail flying, either fleet-by-fleet, or system-wide. And it would be a cinch to furlough, because the distribution of junior pilots would be more even across fleets.
Your argument about furlough is scare tactics. They will furlough when it is economically feasible to do so, and the continuation about it being easier to do with an evenly distributed seniority list is hogwash. But let's suppose what you say is true. Why would the then barely-able-to-hold a line guy on the 737 who would now be a reserve guy not displace to the 320 where he would hold a solid line.. and here's the tricky part... and NOT TAKE A PAYCUT to do so? Hmmmmm he has his QOL and his pay intact.
Old 03-17-2011 | 08:38 AM
  #61978  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
You've actually built the perfect cascade-less, flexible, scaleable, shrinkeable airline.

Congratulations.
Gentlemen, he's got a point.

If we divorce pay from productivity the net result will be decreased compensation for pilots nearing their retirement years and increased pressure to outsource small jet flying.
Old 03-17-2011 | 08:39 AM
  #61979  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Gentlemen, he's got a point.
Full of pointless scare tactics that have no basis in reality, but yeah I guess he does.
Old 03-17-2011 | 08:39 AM
  #61980  
capncrunch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,355
Likes: 34
Default

Apparently it's still hot in the kitchen. My pictures are not distracting enough. Try this....

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices