![]() |
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1089037)
I agree college tuition is artificially inflated due to government subsidies. http://www.timesunion.com/mediaManag...628&height=471 This graph is adjusted for inflation! Real College costs have quadrupled over the last 30 years. Assuming the panel approves these rules eventually, they will cost taxpayers $575 million a year, according to the Congressional Budget Office's scoring of the 2010 law. Once in effect, borrowers will not have to pay more than 10% of their "discretionary income" each year, regardless of how much they owe. The government defines discretionary income as the difference between the borrower's adjusted gross income and 150% of the federal poverty line. If the money isn't completely paid back in 20 years, the remaining debt will be forgiven. That's right. Wait 20 years and, presto, you're student debt-free. Remember, student loans from the government are available regardless of credit history or assets, so default rates are high and have been rising—to 8.8%, according to the most recent government data. Add the possibility that people can choose or end up in occupations that pay low salaries, and the taxpayer loses again. A student who finances an expensive education and then pursues a career with meager salaries could be sticking taxpayers with five- or even six-figure losses by year 20. The loan then becomes a very expensive grant. It gets even more expensive for taxpayers when student borrowers take a "public service" job after graduation, thanks to a program that began in 2007. "Public servants" can get all of their remaining federal student-loan debt forgiven after only 10 years. This applies to government employees such as teachers and to workers at nonprofits. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1088996)
They can vary backfilling and like such as.
Without the Catlin speak, they need people to fly the MD's and aren't going to hire. I'll give you any number of guesses as to how they staff unpopular airplanes in unpopular bases without hiring anyone. I'd imagine some of the higher math going on in the puzzle palace is figuring out how many pilots can get pushed back through the short course. (and for those who don't like the term "unpopular" ... It is more than irony that the MD's are staffed by MD's) Bucking Bar ... embracing the suck ... beats a furlough. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1089075)
Did you punch him in his ovaries?
|
Originally Posted by Jesse
(Post 1089076)
Not going to get any better if some people get there way with an easy out to paying off your college loan.
When guys like me realize we're the ONLY ONES paying our bills, we'll start moving away from places with systems we deem "unfair." I'm nearly giddy that Hank Greenburg is suing the US government over the AIG fiasco. About time. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1089075)
Did you punch him in his ovaries?
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1089077)
I personally believe that U.S. Americans Delta pilots are unable to do so because, uh, some people out there are needed to fly MD88's and MD90's, which have unreliable maps and, uh, I believe our training department, like, such as in South Africa and the Iraq, everywhere, get their training via CD and should help over here with flying these airplanes like we do, uh, or, should fly to cities here in the U.S. so regional pilots can help fly to the South America, the Caribbean and such as and help Asia so they can buy new airplanes. We can help build up our future, for our children, by hiring none of them.
Without the Catlin speak, they need people to fly the MD's and aren't going to hire. I'll give you any number of guesses as to how they staff unpopular airplanes in unpopular bases without hiring anyone. I'd imagine some of the higher math going on in the puzzle palace is figuring out how many pilots can get pushed back through the short course. (and for those who don't like the term "unpopular" ... It is more than irony that the MD's are staffed by MD's) Bucking Bar ... embracing the suck ... beats a furlough. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1088582)
Carl, Every post I ever made is available for you to read. Find a single post where I suggested we take less then SW.
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1088374)
Dalpa's opener will be constructed off the contract survey. I can tell you right now it wont be for more then 42 percent. I doubt it will be even close to that number.
By the way, I see you're still in the witness protection program regarding your accusations of me on the other thread. Carl |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1089090)
You think you're going to get MD'd to the MD? It looks like you should be safe... I may be on the bubble- too hard to tell. :confused:
|
Originally Posted by Jesse
(Post 1089076)
Not going to get any better if some people get there way with an easy out to paying off your college loan.
If we have big oil, big buisness, big bank, big everything, then it's about time we go after big college. The students are not the only ones out of touch... they're just the most annoying. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1089090)
You think you're going to get MD'd to the MD? It looks like you should be safe... I may be on the bubble- too hard to tell. :confused:
Remember, this is the picture you are looking for to keep the toilet seat up: |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:41 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands