Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
88, clearly you have either a grudge or serious man-crush on acl. If you want to go off half cocked about something that has been published a couple of times in union posts... Feel free. But someone bringing it to your attention isn't pushing an alternative agenda.
Clearly acl wants to be our MEC leadership eventually. And let's be honest, a person as well informed, engaged and straight with people should be welcomed. Or shot from long range with a management sniper rifle.
Either way, let us all pray we get what we all need and deserve as a pilot group on C2k12. And for this contract too.
And as long as we're discussing ACL, I would agree with your description of "well informed" and "engaged." "Straight with people"... not so much. I prefer MEC leadership that has principles they are unwilling to compromise on and that does not change their principles with whichever the way the wind is blowing. Sorry.
Ya know ... when you got two minutes to start an engine, enter the AWABS, do a runway change, talk to the flight attendants and run 4 checklists while maintaining situational awareness and talking on the radio ... . stuff does happen. It is "pretty dang poor" to plan the operation that way, then express surprise that someone screws it up.
I'm (not by choice) becoming one of those old, cantankerous, got too much time in this seat kind of FO's (although I try to be polite about it) who says, "Hey Boss, I got to get caught up." Beats an error.
I'm (not by choice) becoming one of those old, cantankerous, got too much time in this seat kind of FO's (although I try to be polite about it) who says, "Hey Boss, I got to get caught up." Beats an error.
I realize things get frantic and time seems to compress, but really, unless I'm evacuating Saigon in a MD88, I don't get in a hurry for anything.
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,990
IMHO flight standards is attempting to regulate discipline. The FO putting the flaps down on the salute worked just fine. I still do it because some CA's don't have it in their cross check. That could explain some of it...but not catching the flap position on the taxi & before takeoff check?
In that same vein, I just flew with an LCA and we were experimenting (at the company's request) with combining the performance and taxi checks. It's even more convoluted and doesn't make sense. Hopefully, cooler heads will prevail because, in my mind, it's stupid.
In that same vein, I just flew with an LCA and we were experimenting (at the company's request) with combining the performance and taxi checks. It's even more convoluted and doesn't make sense. Hopefully, cooler heads will prevail because, in my mind, it's stupid.
Combining the taxi and performance checklists makes sense to me-- if it's done right. Was it weird because you weren't used to it or because it was poorly designed?
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,990
And as long as we're discussing ACL, I would agree with your description of "well informed" and "engaged." "Straight with people"... not so much. I prefer MEC leadership that has principles they are unwilling to compromise on and that does not change their principles with whichever the way the wind is blowing. Sorry.
Ya know ... when you got two minutes to start an engine, enter the AWABS, do a runway change, talk to the flight attendants and run 4 checklists while maintaining situational awareness and talking on the radio ... . stuff does happen. It is "pretty dang poor" to plan the operation that way, then express surprise that someone screws it up.
I'm (not by choice) becoming one of those old, cantankerous, got too much time in this seat kind of FO's (although I try to be polite about it) who says, "Hey Boss, I got to get caught up." Beats an error.
IMHO the checklist change made things WORSE, not better. Now I sit and wait for a command from the Captain which may, or may not, come. He might be busy. Meanwhile, I get busy. Then it gets forgotten until it is really embarrassing for everyone. The "do what you need to do when it needs doing" philosophy is safer, IMHO.
Think I'll just star putting flaps out, then apologizing for it. Cpt. JG will make me cycle the flaps just to prove he's in charge. Honey Badger ... .
I'm (not by choice) becoming one of those old, cantankerous, got too much time in this seat kind of FO's (although I try to be polite about it) who says, "Hey Boss, I got to get caught up." Beats an error.
IMHO the checklist change made things WORSE, not better. Now I sit and wait for a command from the Captain which may, or may not, come. He might be busy. Meanwhile, I get busy. Then it gets forgotten until it is really embarrassing for everyone. The "do what you need to do when it needs doing" philosophy is safer, IMHO.
Think I'll just star putting flaps out, then apologizing for it. Cpt. JG will make me cycle the flaps just to prove he's in charge. Honey Badger ... .
The maddog checklist has about 20 too many items on it... "cruise performance- checked" Really???
The checklist change doesn't make much of a difference on the A-320 fleet since everyone does the after start the FNW way and waits until the waveoff until calling for the checklist. The calling for the flaps was an FNW thing and they just do the checklist call the old way even though the book isn't written that way. It's funny hearing everyone say "wave off received, after start checklist." I'm having trouble finding where that's written... Anyhoo, the new callout works better when it's managed that way, even though it's a bit awkward doesn't flow as well.
No, it was the CA doing everything. You can't input the AWABS without the CA stopping the jet and commanding the input. So, you can't input the numbers at the gate, you have to wait until you're taxiing...and then you have to stop and input the numbers. No more getting it done at the gate when you get the numbers early. CA commands the flaps, starts the taxi, stops the taxi, commands the numbers, corroborate the numbers and start taxiing again. It was adding about 45 seconds to a minute to our departure, which is what we were tasked to measure.
That's excellent - become one of those guys and don't let anyone or anything rush you - I assure you you will get the support if needed. There's an argument you've already won.
I realize things get frantic and time seems to compress, but really, unless I'm evacuating Saigon in a MD88, I don't get in a hurry for anything.
I realize things get frantic and time seems to compress, but really, unless I'm evacuating Saigon in a MD88, I don't get in a hurry for anything.
I'll just say this ACL..... It's a lot of work to fly a five day trip and at the end, fly a turn with someone who is maintaining currency. I respect what some of these guys are doing for the pilot group and my contribution is to make sure we shake hands stepping off the aircraft at the jetway and no additional paperwork is required.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post