Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search
Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2012, 01:27 PM
  #86871  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tomcat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: 320B
Posts: 511
Default

Originally Posted by Jesse View Post
My communication with my rep confirmed this, but leaned toward it most likely would be disclosed. Yeah, I know, basically non-commital.
I agree... Balloons will be floated.
Tomcat is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 01:31 PM
  #86872  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by Professor View Post

88, clearly you have either a grudge or serious man-crush on acl. If you want to go off half cocked about something that has been published a couple of times in union posts... Feel free. But someone bringing it to your attention isn't pushing an alternative agenda.

Clearly acl wants to be our MEC leadership eventually. And let's be honest, a person as well informed, engaged and straight with people should be welcomed. Or shot from long range with a management sniper rifle.

Either way, let us all pray we get what we all need and deserve as a pilot group on C2k12. And for this contract too.
I don't mean to make the discussion about ACL. I'd rather stick to the issues. His response to me was condescending and more than just "bringing it to my attention."

And as long as we're discussing ACL, I would agree with your description of "well informed" and "engaged." "Straight with people"... not so much. I prefer MEC leadership that has principles they are unwilling to compromise on and that does not change their principles with whichever the way the wind is blowing. Sorry.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 01:33 PM
  #86873  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jughead's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: ATL717A
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Ya know ... when you got two minutes to start an engine, enter the AWABS, do a runway change, talk to the flight attendants and run 4 checklists while maintaining situational awareness and talking on the radio ... . stuff does happen. It is "pretty dang poor" to plan the operation that way, then express surprise that someone screws it up.

I'm (not by choice) becoming one of those old, cantankerous, got too much time in this seat kind of FO's (although I try to be polite about it) who says, "Hey Boss, I got to get caught up." Beats an error.
That's excellent - become one of those guys and don't let anyone or anything rush you - I assure you you will get the support if needed. There's an argument you've already won.
I realize things get frantic and time seems to compress, but really, unless I'm evacuating Saigon in a MD88, I don't get in a hurry for anything.
Jughead is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 01:33 PM
  #86874  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,990
Default

Originally Posted by Tomcat View Post
I agree... Balloons will be floated.
Did ya see the balloon those Canadian kids used to put a man in space?

With the Hot Air on this board ... next stop ... Mars.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 01:34 PM
  #86875  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat View Post
IMHO flight standards is attempting to regulate discipline. The FO putting the flaps down on the salute worked just fine. I still do it because some CA's don't have it in their cross check. That could explain some of it...but not catching the flap position on the taxi & before takeoff check?

In that same vein, I just flew with an LCA and we were experimenting (at the company's request) with combining the performance and taxi checks. It's even more convoluted and doesn't make sense. Hopefully, cooler heads will prevail because, in my mind, it's stupid.
Totally agreed on the first part, buzz.

Combining the taxi and performance checklists makes sense to me-- if it's done right. Was it weird because you weren't used to it or because it was poorly designed?
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 01:39 PM
  #86876  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,990
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver View Post
And as long as we're discussing ACL, I would agree with your description of "well informed" and "engaged." "Straight with people"... not so much. I prefer MEC leadership that has principles they are unwilling to compromise on and that does not change their principles with whichever the way the wind is blowing. Sorry.
ACL Straight ... he must be ... saw him going to the grocery store the other day and snapped a pic.


Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 01:40 PM
  #86877  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Ya know ... when you got two minutes to start an engine, enter the AWABS, do a runway change, talk to the flight attendants and run 4 checklists while maintaining situational awareness and talking on the radio ... . stuff does happen. It is "pretty dang poor" to plan the operation that way, then express surprise that someone screws it up.

I'm (not by choice) becoming one of those old, cantankerous, got too much time in this seat kind of FO's (although I try to be polite about it) who says, "Hey Boss, I got to get caught up." Beats an error.

IMHO the checklist change made things WORSE, not better. Now I sit and wait for a command from the Captain which may, or may not, come. He might be busy. Meanwhile, I get busy. Then it gets forgotten until it is really embarrassing for everyone. The "do what you need to do when it needs doing" philosophy is safer, IMHO.

Think I'll just star putting flaps out, then apologizing for it. Cpt. JG will make me cycle the flaps just to prove he's in charge. Honey Badger ... .

The maddog checklist has about 20 too many items on it... "cruise performance- checked" Really???

The checklist change doesn't make much of a difference on the A-320 fleet since everyone does the after start the FNW way and waits until the waveoff until calling for the checklist. The calling for the flaps was an FNW thing and they just do the checklist call the old way even though the book isn't written that way. It's funny hearing everyone say "wave off received, after start checklist." I'm having trouble finding where that's written... Anyhoo, the new callout works better when it's managed that way, even though it's a bit awkward doesn't flow as well.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 01:42 PM
  #86878  
Gets Weekends Off
 
buzzpat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
Totally agreed on the first part, buzz.

Combining the taxi and performance checklists makes sense to me-- if it's done right. Was it weird because you weren't used to it or because it was poorly designed?
No, it was the CA doing everything. You can't input the AWABS without the CA stopping the jet and commanding the input. So, you can't input the numbers at the gate, you have to wait until you're taxiing...and then you have to stop and input the numbers. No more getting it done at the gate when you get the numbers early. CA commands the flaps, starts the taxi, stops the taxi, commands the numbers, corroborate the numbers and start taxiing again. It was adding about 45 seconds to a minute to our departure, which is what we were tasked to measure.
buzzpat is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 01:44 PM
  #86879  
Weekend and Holiday Pilot
 
Doug Masters's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Sippin' at the Troubadour
Posts: 1,141
Default

Originally Posted by Jughead View Post
That's excellent - become one of those guys and don't let anyone or anything rush you - I assure you you will get the support if needed. There's an argument you've already won.
I realize things get frantic and time seems to compress, but really, unless I'm evacuating Saigon in a MD88, I don't get in a hurry for anything.
I move at one speed all the time. The speed of safe.
Doug Masters is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 01:44 PM
  #86880  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tomcat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: 320B
Posts: 511
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
Wait a minute. You flew with pilots on our seniority list that are part of the MEC administration? It can't be. Everyone posts that these guys just collect FPL and never fly!
I'll just say this ACL..... It's a lot of work to fly a five day trip and at the end, fly a turn with someone who is maintaining currency. I respect what some of these guys are doing for the pilot group and my contribution is to make sure we shake hands stepping off the aircraft at the jetway and no additional paperwork is required.
Tomcat is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices