Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
#9001
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,990
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10, requirement satisfied.
Last edited by Bucking Bar; 06-24-2009 at 03:35 PM.
#9002
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 973
Kinda confused here.........do you think your last great DAL contract (before BK) was provided by a benevolent management, or do you think that the strike that NWA pilots took had ANYTHING to do with that contrac. Sometimes militant unionism is necessary......Go Cobra Airlines!
#9003
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,990
Militant unionism has its place.
Over the long term, carefully considered, professional and objective leadership nets better results. No workers make much money at an insolvent employer.
You can play the crazy card every once in a while, but you've got to be very careful with that in this business environment. You have to be sure that the other party at the table isn't more crazy and that the net result doesn't harm both sides.
Over the long term, carefully considered, professional and objective leadership nets better results. No workers make much money at an insolvent employer.
You can play the crazy card every once in a while, but you've got to be very careful with that in this business environment. You have to be sure that the other party at the table isn't more crazy and that the net result doesn't harm both sides.
#9004
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 973
Militant unionism has its place.
Over the long term, carefully considered, professional and objective leadership nets better results. No workers make much money at an insolvent employer.
You can play the crazy card every once in a while, but you've got to be very careful with that in this business environment. You have to be sure that the other party at the table isn't more crazy and that the net result doesn't harm both sides.
Over the long term, carefully considered, professional and objective leadership nets better results. No workers make much money at an insolvent employer.
You can play the crazy card every once in a while, but you've got to be very careful with that in this business environment. You have to be sure that the other party at the table isn't more crazy and that the net result doesn't harm both sides.
#9005
Carl,
I don't have any brand loyalty to anyone or anything and I think it's been working out crappy for all of us for about 8 years. But, I wonder if we as pilots would be more effective as part of a larger group. If your beef with ALPA someting that can't be cured by amending the constitution and by laws and a new (and I mean really new) leadership?
Don't get me wrong, I do not defend ALPA in it's current state to anyone. But, it does provide a framework to work with that will take years to reproduce.
This forum is a great place to have this discussion and I'm interested in hearing what you think.
My opening thought is that bigger is better, and if somehow we could really get the DAL, AMR, UAL, CAL, & US Air pilots to work together, it would be better for us all. Too "hopey, changie" for you? Maybe. But, every great cause begins with someone saying, "what if?" I think we can come up with a few of those.
New K Now
I don't have any brand loyalty to anyone or anything and I think it's been working out crappy for all of us for about 8 years. But, I wonder if we as pilots would be more effective as part of a larger group. If your beef with ALPA someting that can't be cured by amending the constitution and by laws and a new (and I mean really new) leadership?
Don't get me wrong, I do not defend ALPA in it's current state to anyone. But, it does provide a framework to work with that will take years to reproduce.
This forum is a great place to have this discussion and I'm interested in hearing what you think.
My opening thought is that bigger is better, and if somehow we could really get the DAL, AMR, UAL, CAL, & US Air pilots to work together, it would be better for us all. Too "hopey, changie" for you? Maybe. But, every great cause begins with someone saying, "what if?" I think we can come up with a few of those.
New K Now
The success of UPS and Southwest's unions are templates for us. A large strong union whose efforts and dues money are TOTALLY focused on what is best for Delta Air Lines' pilots.
Carl
#9006
NEW TA in July?
Word is we have a brand new TA with management regarding the Air France/KLM joint venture that will be presented to the MEC in July.
Interesting thought: Wouldn't this be a good time for a little Quid Pro Quo?
How about a little Section One Shuffle?
Say, bring the Compass pilots on property with the 36 EMB-175's and type, let the chips fall where they may. Need a TA for the JV, how about a little give and take for the little man?
Fire away!!!!!
TC
Interesting thought: Wouldn't this be a good time for a little Quid Pro Quo?
How about a little Section One Shuffle?
Say, bring the Compass pilots on property with the 36 EMB-175's and type, let the chips fall where they may. Need a TA for the JV, how about a little give and take for the little man?
Fire away!!!!!
TC
Last edited by Tomcat; 06-24-2009 at 05:38 PM.
#9007
Carl that is just not true. There was a very large expense to bring NWA up to the Delta contract. Don't you remember all the whining you did about Letter 19? Don't you remember Dave Stevens whining in Congress about a B-Scale? Don't you remember all that? If the contracts were equal, then why were you guys crying?
Now, regarding LOA 19...Yes that took additional dollars to bring NWA pilots up to the PAY portion of LOA 19. This was important because LOA 19 would NEVER have been negotiated with Delta pilots were it not for the fact that Delta management DESPERATELY needed this merger for NWA's route structure and billions in cash. If you think LOA 19 would have been negotiated without a proposal to merge with NWA, then there's not much hope here.
Carl
#9008
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
I really don't like the fact that there is a new TA on the table for the new JV with AF/KLM. It really makes me worry, especially in this economy. Carl, I hope you can rally the WB guys because management might be getting ready to throw a curveball.
#9009
Okay, and I have known and worked with Lee off an on for almost 20 years. The problem is that people have made this issue hyper-emotional and when that happens they lose perspective. So at least if we are going to deal with the issue, let's deal with facts and not fables.
Lee is very careful about what he says and he would never say ever that he thinks it's good for Delta pilots to have DCI pilots make low wages. First, that statement makes no sense, second he does not believe that. So let's at least put that legend to rest.
What action do you want? You are a single issue person and are somewhat obsessed with this topic. Guess what, there are many other issues to deal with now. Do you really want to open up the contract right now and start talking about big issues? Is this really a good time for that?
While it is easy to pop off on a web board about some issue, it is much tougher to actually accomplish the task. Maybe you could just take a bigger view sometime and think about the multitude of emergency procedures that we have been dealing with in the last five years. In case you forgot, Delta was pretty close to being left for dead in early 2006. We are just 3 years beyond that and are now with the largest airline in the world and hooked up with Air France/KLM in a joint venture. Oh yeah, did I forget that we fought off a hostile takeover that would have cut our pilot force by a one third.
That in itself is better job protection than you can ever write into a contract. Rather than sit back and watch this change happen to us, DALPA has been at the forefront of managing this change and has gotten important contractual advancements at the same time. I am sorry but if you can't see the actions that were required to pull that off then it is pretty pointless arguing with you.
So I see a storm of a handful of people complaining of web boards about how other people are not working hard enough for them, but that is not a mass effort. Your basic problem is that want simple solutions to complicated problems and you want it now. My question back to you is what are you doing about this other than complaining on web boards. Why don't you go to your local representative and find out what you can do for your union. You would be surprised at the amount of work that needs to be done. It takes more time than banging on the keyboard but you might actually accomplish somethng rather than complaining about others.
Lee is very careful about what he says and he would never say ever that he thinks it's good for Delta pilots to have DCI pilots make low wages. First, that statement makes no sense, second he does not believe that. So let's at least put that legend to rest.
What action do you want? You are a single issue person and are somewhat obsessed with this topic. Guess what, there are many other issues to deal with now. Do you really want to open up the contract right now and start talking about big issues? Is this really a good time for that?
While it is easy to pop off on a web board about some issue, it is much tougher to actually accomplish the task. Maybe you could just take a bigger view sometime and think about the multitude of emergency procedures that we have been dealing with in the last five years. In case you forgot, Delta was pretty close to being left for dead in early 2006. We are just 3 years beyond that and are now with the largest airline in the world and hooked up with Air France/KLM in a joint venture. Oh yeah, did I forget that we fought off a hostile takeover that would have cut our pilot force by a one third.
That in itself is better job protection than you can ever write into a contract. Rather than sit back and watch this change happen to us, DALPA has been at the forefront of managing this change and has gotten important contractual advancements at the same time. I am sorry but if you can't see the actions that were required to pull that off then it is pretty pointless arguing with you.
So I see a storm of a handful of people complaining of web boards about how other people are not working hard enough for them, but that is not a mass effort. Your basic problem is that want simple solutions to complicated problems and you want it now. My question back to you is what are you doing about this other than complaining on web boards. Why don't you go to your local representative and find out what you can do for your union. You would be surprised at the amount of work that needs to be done. It takes more time than banging on the keyboard but you might actually accomplish somethng rather than complaining about others.
I say yes. I say ANY other issue is #2. Any other answer besides yes requires a tortuous contortion of reason and logic. Your post is a prime example of such contortion.
Carl
#9010
ALPA has its issues, with that I agree. But to imply that these guys had superior contracts because of their in house union is just flat wrong.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post