Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 04-11-2012 | 10:46 AM
  #95411  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Default

I have often thought they could just do the same with an hourly secure bus between jfk and lga. Why not, continental/united does it ewr to abe....heck they even give it a flight number, I have actually jumpseated on it in the past.
Old 04-11-2012 | 10:46 AM
  #95412  
Elvis90's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
From: MSP7ERB
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
I was gonna link the same story. This is one of the most interesting and exciting things to happen around here in a long time. What really makes it so much fun is the talking heads that are totally bewildered about it.

"Experts" said Tebow couldn't win in the NFL too.
This idea is pretty creative. I hope it works out for the largest commercial consumer of jet fuel on earth. I'd put it on par with SWA's early fuel hedging strategy.
Old 04-11-2012 | 10:48 AM
  #95413  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
No...not -Through- Queens, they'll go underground, so it won't disrupt the surface flow!

You know that will be 'cost effective'!
ROTFLMAO. You know one of the JFK terminal solutions proposed taking the old JBlue terminal and tunnelling under 31R to all of that area where there are the cargo terminals and building a DTW style gate building.. THAT would have been much more cost effective than a connector train btwn LGA and JFK, and it was scrapped for cost.

Nope.. just crazy talk, but I am sure it has been talked about.. doesn't men there has been any serious consideration... unless maybe if it is a MagLev train that needs no track.. Now THAT would be innovative.
Old 04-11-2012 | 10:51 AM
  #95414  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by groundstop
For real? If true, wow.
Originally Posted by rvr350
Obviously the RJ are better fitted to fly between these two tiny east coast cities. Mgmt reserve the right to upgauge the RJ to the E175 if revenue improves
Originally Posted by Timbo
The LGA-ORD shuttle has always been on RJ's, right? (on E175's?)

I thought I saw a bunch of them over at the MAT, while I was doing LGA-BOS.

Yup, we are going to OWN NYC!

Oh wait, 'we' don't fly those jets...
Yeah there is a memo on Deltanet explaining it all.
Old 04-11-2012 | 10:51 AM
  #95415  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,876
Likes: 193
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
ROTFLMAO. You know one of the JFK terminal solutions proposed taking the old JBlue terminal and tunnelling under 31R to all of that area where there are the cargo terminals and building a DTW style gate building.. THAT would have been much more cost effective than a connector train btwn LGA and JFK, and it was scrapped for cost.

Nope.. just crazy talk, but I am sure it has been talked about.. doesn't men there has been any serious consideration... unless maybe if it is a MagLev train that needs no track.. Now THAT would be innovative.

Most of JFK is built on former swamp. No matter how they tried to engineer the tunnels it was a giant nightmare and as you mentioned way beyond anything they could consider cost effective. Terminal 8 in JFK is the new focus. It would work perfect for us.
Old 04-11-2012 | 10:56 AM
  #95416  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Most of JFK is built on former swamp. No matter how they tried to engineer the tunnels it was a giant nightmare and as you mentioned way beyond anything they could consider cost effective. Terminal 8 in JFK is the new focus. It would work perfect for us.
As in an asset swap? That makes sense since AMR (apparently) isn't filling that terminal and are (obviously) cash strapped. We build T4 and do a swap deal.. interesting. Prolly about the same money spent by both players, and we would get maximum utilization for that expenditure.

I think that tunneling idea was pretty cool though, but as I understand it you are correct about the water problems..
Old 04-11-2012 | 11:04 AM
  #95417  
Timbo's Avatar
Runs with scissors
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Yeah there is a memo on Deltanet explaining it all.

Thanks, I just read it on the DALPA forum and I was going to post it here...then I remembered that little blurb on DL Net about not lifting stuff from there...

So, yeah, the Shuttle is going RJ. BUT, they said there will be enough A320 departures to make up the lost flying, with more of them out of JFK. They said since the High Speed Acella train came on like, shuttle pax boardings are off by more than 50%.

Here's their route map, look out, PHL and DCA will be next! http://www.amtrak.com/servlet/Conten...=1241245664867

Last edited by Timbo; 04-11-2012 at 11:30 AM.
Old 04-11-2012 | 11:08 AM
  #95418  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Most of JFK is built on former swamp. No matter how they tried to engineer the tunnels it was a giant nightmare and as you mentioned way beyond anything they could consider cost effective. Terminal 8 in JFK is the new focus. It would work perfect for us.
I believe EWR is over a swamp too.

One day when I was at Coex I made the run from Terminal C to A to catch an ATL flight. I missed the first one but was waiting for the second when I noticed the 737 had stopped on the middle of the ramp after push back. Soon stairs were sent to the airplane and then people got off the airplane and began walking in. The right main had fallen into the pavement. For weeks there was a cone in the hole to let you know don't go there.

I can't remember if I got out of EWR that day or not. I probably did. It's all a blur.
Old 04-11-2012 | 11:26 AM
  #95419  
Timbo's Avatar
Runs with scissors
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Default

And you KNOW why they call Laguardia, "La Garbage", right?

That airport was built over a garbage dump/land fill.
Old 04-11-2012 | 11:28 AM
  #95420  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
And you KNOW why they call Laguardia, "La Garbage", right?
and why is it that "guard" is pronounced -gard- but Laguardia is pronounced -lagwadier-?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices