Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
05-06-2012 | 12:42 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
From: 7er
05-06-2012 | 01:17 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
From: right for a long, long time
Sailing, it's very encouraging to hear you say you would not vote for an increase in large RJs.
Hypothesis: Judging from the pacing of these rumors, I think something else could be at play. Think about what has happened on this board (microcosm of what is happening in the big world): The first trial balloon we saw was more 76 seaters in exchange for more mainline jets, hiring, etc. This was met (at least here) with furious opposition. That rumor died down a little, and then we started hearing about 90-seaters being in play. This was even more upsetting. Was this an attempt by mgt to manage our expectations? In other words, when we see an eventual TA with increased 76-seaters, we will be relieved because "at least it doesn't have 90-seaters!" Conjecture on my part, but...
IMHO, we need to see through these ploys and remember some key facts:
- Mgt's words ("We don't like the RJ product") violently disagree with their actions (maxing out large RJs to the contractual limit, filling LGA with them after the slot swap, focusing their advertising on large RJs with First Class, and flying them between cities like New York and Chicago.) If we let them replace everything A-320/M90 and smaller with DCI & Alaska tomorrow, I have no doubt they would do it.
- When mgt is confronted about RJs, the continual reply is that they are being parked as quickly as possible. This may be true of 50-seaters, but it is dishonest to lump them together with the big ones. Some 50-seaters are being parked...the big ones are continuing to be utilized in the most economical way as permitted by the Delta PWA.
Hypothesis: Judging from the pacing of these rumors, I think something else could be at play. Think about what has happened on this board (microcosm of what is happening in the big world): The first trial balloon we saw was more 76 seaters in exchange for more mainline jets, hiring, etc. This was met (at least here) with furious opposition. That rumor died down a little, and then we started hearing about 90-seaters being in play. This was even more upsetting. Was this an attempt by mgt to manage our expectations? In other words, when we see an eventual TA with increased 76-seaters, we will be relieved because "at least it doesn't have 90-seaters!" Conjecture on my part, but...
IMHO, we need to see through these ploys and remember some key facts:
- Mgt's words ("We don't like the RJ product") violently disagree with their actions (maxing out large RJs to the contractual limit, filling LGA with them after the slot swap, focusing their advertising on large RJs with First Class, and flying them between cities like New York and Chicago.) If we let them replace everything A-320/M90 and smaller with DCI & Alaska tomorrow, I have no doubt they would do it.
- When mgt is confronted about RJs, the continual reply is that they are being parked as quickly as possible. This may be true of 50-seaters, but it is dishonest to lump them together with the big ones. Some 50-seaters are being parked...the big ones are continuing to be utilized in the most economical way as permitted by the Delta PWA.
- We can fly large RJs at mainline for very close to the same cost of DCI! I'm not sure how the marginal cost savings (if there is any) is worth the sub-par service our passengers receive on DCI. For whatever reason, mgt seems hell-bent on placing as many of them on DCI as we let them (even to the detriment of the Delta image). Our kids would also eat as many Snickers as we let them, even though they are bad for their health. In both cases, let's not let them!
05-06-2012 | 01:22 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
From: 7er
05-06-2012 | 01:32 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,070
Likes: 1
From: Urban chicken rancher.
05-06-2012 | 01:37 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: One with wings
Look's like reserve is going to go MUCH more senior....higher guarantee and more X days. Sick leave is FIXED! So far so good!
05-06-2012 | 02:00 PM
Happy to be here
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
05-06-2012 | 02:02 PM
Happy to be here
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Depends. More commuter friendly wording too. Looking forward to dissecting the final product. If the rest follows this line, theses pilots and their team have been working very hard.
05-06-2012 | 02:03 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,105
Likes: 100
The endgame is afoot. The NC is priming the pump.
Remember that any communication is completely vetted/edited ONLY by the MEC administration, and it's very likely your reps saw it at the same time you did.
Nu
Remember that any communication is completely vetted/edited ONLY by the MEC administration, and it's very likely your reps saw it at the same time you did.
Nu
05-06-2012 | 02:09 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
From: 7er
How many less pilots will we need by increasing the ALV and by increasing the reserve limit fro ALV to ALV + 15?
05-06-2012 | 02:12 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,876
Likes: 193
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
