![]() |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1772840)
That seems a bit odd. They gave Carl a exact copy of a agreement not released to the membership and won't give you a hint on the surveys?
Obviously a rep characterized the survey for you, so that must be ok. Please share the characterization with the rest of us. Jerry |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1772840)
That seems a bit odd. They gave Carl a exact copy of a agreement not released to the membership and won't give you a hint on the surveys?
Carl |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1772846)
Sailing
Obviously a rep characterized the survey for you, so that must be ok. Please share the characterization with the rest of us. Jerry Now you can't get your reps to talk about surveys? |
Posted just now #1
My yes vote will hang on DALPA delivering their promised "historic" C2015. Major gains in each section. There is no excuse for money only items. I will name a few and I hope you will add many more. Best hotel language ever written Best crew rest facility language ever written Minimum additional $1 per diem date of signing 2004 hourly rates plus date of signing or it's a NO $4000 per pilot annually contributed to HSA medical Door pay International pay for any flight outside U.S. Night pay Increase in international pay There is zero excuse for not attaining money items. IMO we will easily see $6 billion plus in profits for 2015. $8 billion if they didn't misplay the hedge. |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1781139)
There is zero excuse for not attaining money items. IMO we will easily see $6 billion plus in profits for 2015. $8 billion if they didn't misplay the hedge.
|
I thought the $1.7 Billion already includes the $1.2 Billion loss? So it would have been $2.9 Billion in savings...but it's $1.7 Billion instead. Or am I not interpreting this correctly?
Losing out on $1.2 Billion out of $1.7 Billion would mean we are 70% hedged for 2015. |
Originally Posted by DALFA
(Post 1781173)
I thought the $1.7 Billion already includes the $1.2 Billion loss? So it would have been $2.9 Billion in savings...but it's $1.7 Billion instead. Or am I not interpreting this correctly?
Losing out on $1.2 Billion out of $1.7 Billion would mean we are 70% hedged for 2015. |
Minimum of $1 billion additonal date of.signing. $600 million hourly increase and $400 work rule, etc.
Historic would be much, much higher, but this is the absolute bottom. Non fuel costs are projected to decrease .2% in 2015. OUR CONCESSIONS ARE NO LONGER NECESSARY |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1781210)
Minimum of $1 billion additonal date of.signing. $600 million hourly increase and $400 work rule, etc.
Historic would be much, much higher, but this is the absolute bottom. Non fuel costs are projected to decrease .2% in 2015. OUR CONCESSIONS ARE NO LONGER NECESSARY And "door pay" is a huge concession if it comes with a change to how status quo block time is calculated. Lets not fall for the ball and cup street hustle. |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1781139)
Posted just now #1
My yes vote will hang on DALPA delivering their promised "historic" C2015. Major gains in each section. There is no excuse for money only items. I will name a few and I hope you will add many more. Best hotel language ever written Best crew rest facility language ever written Minimum additional $1 per diem date of signing 2004 hourly rates plus date of signing or it's a NO $4000 per pilot annually contributed to HSA medical Door pay International pay for any flight outside U.S. Night pay Increase in international pay There is zero excuse for not attaining money items. IMO we will easily see $6 billion plus in profits for 2015. $8 billion if they didn't misplay the hedge. Bottom line, a couple billion toward the pilots is reasonable and sustainable. This amount won't put much of a dent in the Billions Delta will reap in the coming years. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:31 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands