![]() |
Originally Posted by ExAF
(Post 1849084)
He's referring to the fact that we have NO minimum day at all, just an average day. Big difference that won't be apparent on a 1 or 2 day trip. Toss in a 30 hr layover and look at the difference.
- VM did not apply to 30 hour layovers (only days in which you actually flew) - VM did not apply to DH-only duty periods. - Reserves did not get VM ALL of the above apply to our ADG. In fact that is one of the greatest improvements I have seen to our contract in the 18+ years I have been here. How guys on this forum dismiss it or take it for granted astounds me. Further, I have yet to see ANY trip flown anywhere where the F/A pay exceeds ours. On trips with lots of block time (high time turnarounds, international trips) they will often pay the same; in most instances of shorter trips they almost always pay less. They never pay more that I am aware of. If such rare occasions do in fact exist (and I am not sure that they do) then they are greatly outnumbered by the opposite. |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1848822)
DALPA has agreed to keep management's opener confidential.
This is a huge mistake. If it was shown to the pilots, their ask for concessions would have to be much, much smaller. Unacceptable. So, what's your answer if the company says "we aren't going to open until you agree to keep our opener confidential"? Personally, I'd be cool with waiting them out while we rack up record profit sharing, but that's just me. |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1848898)
Exactly correct. Releasing their opener would allow the line pilots to view a fully accurate picture of the negotiations that DALPA claims they want us fully engaged on. Yet DALPA is choosing to be complicit with management to keep important information from us.
Carl |
Originally Posted by Herkflyr
(Post 1849267)
We used to have a similar provision called Variable Minimum (VM) which could range from 4-6. But it was still not nearly as good as our ADG (Average Daily Guarantee). To summarize:
- VM did not apply to 30 hour layovers (only days in which you actually flew) - VM did not apply to DH-only duty periods. - Reserves did not get VM ALL of the above apply to our ADG. In fact that is one of the greatest improvements I have seen to our contract in the 18+ years I have been here. How guys on this forum dismiss it or take it for granted astounds me. Further, I have yet to see ANY trip flown anywhere where the F/A pay exceeds ours. On trips with lots of block time (high time turnarounds, international trips) they will often pay the same; in most instances of shorter trips they almost always pay less. They never pay more that I am aware of. If such rare occasions do in fact exist (and I am not sure that they do) then they are greatly outnumbered by the opposite. |
Originally Posted by Herkflyr
(Post 1849029)
What precisely are you referring to. I have flown many a one and two day trip with the same footprint as our FAs, and our 5.15 calendar day average always pays out more than what they get.
Min day 5:15 Same trip 6:30+5:15+7:50=17:35 C2015 |
Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
(Post 1849233)
A golfer doesn't have to win every tournament to win the FedEx Cup either. As a matter of fact, they can do it without winning a single one.
Carl |
Originally Posted by nwaf16dude
(Post 1849334)
So, what's your answer if the company says "we aren't going to open until you agree to keep our opener confidential"?
Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1849516)
Hmmm...trial balloon on DALPA's excuse for failing again? I can hear it now: "Look guys, we may not lead the industry in any area, but we're in the middle, which equals...the world's greatest contract!"
Carl |
Originally Posted by nwaf16dude
(Post 1849334)
I think this is normal for Delta...i.e "lets negotiate in private and keep it out of the papers at least until we **** each other off."
So, what's your answer if the company says "we aren't going to open until you agree to keep our opener confidential"? Personally, I'd be cool with waiting them out while we rack up record profit sharing, but that's just me. The only one we saw bits and pieces of was 'Letter 46 and Letter 51' which were both done in the bankruptcy era and most of it was published in the USA Today. We'd usually read it there prior to hearing about it from DALPA....:rolleyes: We didn't hear about the company opening for zero percent raises in C2012 until after the vote! If we had heard that part first, no way it ever would have passed! |
Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
(Post 1849569)
Again, if you don't like what is presented, vote no. It really is that simple. Read the TA for yourself, make your own decision and vote. I, like many others on here couldn't care less what you think because what is important to you is not necessarily important to me. A very wise FO once said to me, "I don't care about being paid the most, I want to be paid the longest.". Of course we all know the world revolves around you Carl.
Carl |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:34 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands