Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Details on Delta TA (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/88532-details-delta-ta.html)

gzsg 08-05-2014 10:25 AM


Originally Posted by Rather B Fishin (Post 1699632)
He indeed does. It's ironic that he and others want the payrates/contract of fDAL but not the mindset/culture/MEC that got those rates......

I read everything Captain Malone wrote and would have followed him easily.

T.O. And M.D. Are no John Malone.

I would love to hear more from Mike. Love for him to lead us. The lack of communication leads me to believe another cost neutral deal is coming our way.

We got C2012 because Tim ignored the pilots and was way over his head. Was there more on the table?

Let's not repeat that.

gzsg 08-05-2014 10:30 AM


Originally Posted by Rather B Fishin (Post 1699632)
He indeed does. It's ironic that he and others want the payrates/contract of fDAL but not the mindset/culture/MEC that got those rates......

I hear what you are saying, but look at the reality. The disrespect.

Management couldn't delay a couple of days and inform the pilot group of the parking of the 747s?

Management's behavior on FAR 117?

A330 rest facilities?

$2.75 billion in a second round of buy backs/dividends to the shareholder and the pilot concessions stay in place?

What am I missing?

There is no balance.

Jerry

shiznit 08-05-2014 10:57 AM


Originally Posted by ATL7ER (Post 1699562)
Your rates posted above are correct for NWA....with the slight difference that the 11/04 rate you posted wasn't the rate until 12/04.

Having said that, what is the relevence of the NWA rates in 2004? Unless of course your unspoken agenda is to make a jab at fNWA guys for how bad the rates got in BK and therefore how happy they should be even with current DAL rates. What would that accomplish?

We're all DAL now, like it or not, and since Delta was the surviving company following the merger, it seems to me that we should all be focused on improving the contract at Delta. Unless of course you're actually that PTC guy from the old Dalpa forum that smugly stated that fNWA's "got Their restoration at the merger" and should not be allowed to comment on the concept of restoration at DAL.

If so, let's just say I find that attitude inconsistent with unity and the goal of improving our PWA.

Nothing of the sort. I was simply asking Jerry what his rate was in 2004. His inability to give a straight answer to a simple question like that gives me great pause to believe the more complex things he purports.

We all have a right to speak, but we all have a responsibility to speak truthfully.

DAL 88 Driver 08-05-2014 11:04 AM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1699694)
Nothing of the sort. I was simply asking Jerry what his rate was in 2004. His inability to give a straight answer to a simple question like that gives me great pause to believe the more complex things he purports.

We all have a right to speak, but we all have a responsibility to speak truthfully.

Translation: "Since I can't win based on the merit of my argument, I'll try slinging a little mud and see if I can cast doubts on his credibility."

You must really be a DALPA insider, Shiz!

Schwanker 08-05-2014 11:27 AM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1699694)
Nothing of the sort. I was simply asking Jerry what his rate was in 2004. His inability to give a straight answer to a simple question like that gives me great pause to believe the more complex things he purports.

We all have a right to speak, but we all have a responsibility to speak truthfully.

Apples and Oranges. NWAs contract often provided higher W-2s with lower rates. Many took paycuts (lower W-2s) immediately after the merger despite higher rates. Using the DAL rates would be more relevant.

sailingfun 08-05-2014 12:21 PM


Originally Posted by gzsg (Post 1699666)
I read everything Captain Malone wrote and would have followed him easily.

T.O. And M.D. Are no John Malone.

I would love to hear more from Mike. Love for him to lead us. The lack of communication leads me to believe another cost neutral deal is coming our way.

We got C2012 because Tim ignored the pilots and was way over his head. Was there more on the table?

Let's not repeat that.

Of course John Malone brought the E170/175 to DCI and thought that was a good decision.

Alan Shore 08-05-2014 12:38 PM


Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver (Post 1699512)
Why won't he say this publicly or to management? Is the negotiation for C2015 to be some kind of surprise attack like Pearl Harbor? That sounds like a great strategy... Let's spend 10 years making them think we're okay with bankruptcy as a reset and then we'll blindside 'em with opening for restoration. :rolleyes:

Nice. For what it's worth, PUB events are certainly public, although I agree that they may not have the reach of a Chairman's Letter. I can't speak for what he's saying to management.


Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver (Post 1699512)
I'm glad you're optimistic, Alan, (and more importantly, I'm glad to know you agree with restoration as the objective) but I think you're being extremely naive given the reality of the predominant thinking within our MEC.

I've been accused of worse. :o

ATL7ER 08-05-2014 12:52 PM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1699694)
Nothing of the sort. I was simply asking Jerry what his rate was in 2004. His inability to give a straight answer to a simple question like that gives me great pause to believe the more complex things he purports.

We all have a right to speak, but we all have a responsibility to speak truthfully.

I disagree. Jerry gave a straight answer.

Jerry is a DAL 757 CA. "His" rate in 2004 is what the DAL 757A rate was in 2004.

The fact that Jerry was a NWA 757 CA in 2004 is irrelevant....unless you're trying to make the inferences that I mentioned or make it personal. But I thought we were talking about getting pay rates back to where they should be at Delta. Since Delta is where we all work now.

Using what I sense is your logic here then any DAL pilot that was not on property in 2004, including all the new hires that will be here long after we are all gone, should not be able to use 2004 rates as a reference point in attempts to improve the PWA.

alfaromeo 08-05-2014 12:57 PM


Originally Posted by Schwanker (Post 1699711)
Apples and Oranges. NWAs contract often provided higher W-2s with lower rates. Many took paycuts (lower W-2s) immediately after the merger despite higher rates. Using the DAL rates would be more relevant.

This statement keeps getting repeated and is just false. First, almost every NWA pilot stayed on the NWA work rules throughout 2009, so when people say they took a pay cut because of DAL work rules it doesn't make sense. Second, if you remember, in June of 2008, the NWA MEC signed a Furlough Mitigation letter to prevent furloughs due to the DC-9 and 747F block hour reductions. Part of that furlough mitigation was an agreement for NWA pilots to fly fewer hours to keep pilots working. In fact, that block hour reduction got spread out to the DAL pilots through balancing 757 hours. So we all got fewer hours in 2009 which was acceptable, but to hear that you got screwed in the deal rings a little false in my mind. If you wanted to fly more hours in 2009, you should not have signed that furlough mitigation letter and furloughed pilots. That doesn't sound like a good trade in my mind.

Finally, in the twelve months before the merger, NWA pilots average 12 MINUTES more pay per MONTH than DAL pilots. I don't know if you got like $5,000 per hour more for those 12 minutes but if not, there was no statistically significant difference between the two contracts in terms of hours paid.

tsquare 08-05-2014 01:01 PM


Originally Posted by gzsg (Post 1699663)
No one is getting displaced.

You do not begin to understand the waterfall. The training pipeline is full. The sims are full.

Running the reverse waterfall off the 747 would create hundreds of additional initial training events.

Why do you think Steve wants to talk to the association?

OK, then stop the cryptic busschit and explain it then oh exalted one. How are 3 whales going to the desert, that are paid the top payrate not going to result in pilots being displaced... and THEN result in a cascade of paycuts for an increased number of pilots below them? I don't give a chit about your waterfall scenario wrt training events. There will be guys who will be making less per hour. THAT in my part of this life is a paycut. Explain it differently, and without the black helicopters.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:17 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands