Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Details on Delta TA (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/88532-details-delta-ta.html)

Carl Spackler 05-12-2015 12:06 PM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1878860)
Too lazy to type out every single item, just citing the most recent example.

Not too lazy, too disingenuous. C2012 had a number of pro-company items implement immediately and pro-pilot items delayed for months. The main reason I remember was "computer programming issues." Reality is that it was just more self-funding to make C2012 cost neutral.

Carl

LeineLodge 05-12-2015 01:14 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1878932)
Not too lazy, too disingenuous. C2012 had a number of pro-company items implement immediately and pro-pilot items delayed for months. The main reason I remember was "computer programming issues." Reality is that it was just more self-funding to make C2012 cost neutral.

Carl

Examples please?

What you call reality is just opinion unless you can show examples of how the company benefitted early while we had to wait for ours. I've already given a few examples from the implementation schedule a few posts back.

Yes, some items were not implemented immediately. That happens on both sides of the table for a variety of reasons.

TenYearsGone 05-12-2015 01:39 PM

Not to sound funny but how come know one is demanding an increase to our PROFIT SHARING?

TEN

gloopy 05-12-2015 02:42 PM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1878845)
Factually incorrect.

MOU 14-01 Implementation Schedule for LOA 14-01 express prohibited the company from using the FAR 117 FDP's until the implementation of the 5:15 ADG, among other things.

Yet the 10 AM report on day one was agreed to immediately versus the previous 12PM status quo/reg/contract report, and the notification "hammer" was laid down instantly before the ink was dry.

While its easy to point to single examples either way, the trends do seem to support company relief first while waiting a bit to get our end of things more often than not.

I love the "computer programming" excuse though. Have we ever had to delay implementation of agreed upon concessions because they needed time to write code?

MoonShot 05-12-2015 03:43 PM

Has there been a recent contract comparison done and published or will that come later?

I can't remember if the last one I saw had the new AA/UA contracts.

index 05-12-2015 03:44 PM


Originally Posted by TenYearsGone (Post 1879014)
Not to sound funny but how come know one is demanding an increase to our PROFIT SHARING?

TEN

That's an easy one. MANAGEMENT and DALPA are one and the same.

pilotjockey 05-12-2015 06:01 PM

management and alpo can often be confused

Carl Spackler 05-12-2015 06:04 PM


Originally Posted by LeineLodge (Post 1878995)
Examples please?

I don't have the C2012 implementation schedule anymore, but maybe someone that still has it can post it. If you want to say that there weren't examples of pro-company things happening immediately and pro-pilot things taking months to "implement", knock yourself out.


Originally Posted by LeineLodge (Post 1878995)
What you call reality is just opinion unless you can show examples of how the company benefitted early while we had to wait for ours. I've already given a few examples from the implementation schedule a few posts back.

See above.


Originally Posted by LeineLodge (Post 1878995)
Yes, some items were not implemented immediately. That happens on both sides of the table for a variety of reasons.

Then why did you ask for examples earlier when you already knew it happened exactly as I said it did?

Carl

Carl Spackler 05-12-2015 06:05 PM


Originally Posted by TenYearsGone (Post 1879014)
Not to sound funny but how come know one is demanding an increase to our PROFIT SHARING?

What a great point THAT is!

Carl

pilotjockey 05-12-2015 06:26 PM


Originally Posted by TenYearsGone (Post 1879014)
Not to sound funny but how come know one is demanding an increase to our PROFIT SHARING?

TEN


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1879279)
What a great point THAT is!

Carl

yeah, lets move 100% of our pay to the ps plan, awesome. cmon though for real, cuz thats a financially foolish idea. more money now is better than future money that might or might not be there because managment whizzed it away on bad decisions or a jihadi joe event. im almost afraid alpo would do something dumb like try to increase it but thankfully there were enough pilots who said reduce it or leave it alone so hopefully they wont try


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:56 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands