Search
Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-10-2015, 03:12 AM
  #7021  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Default

Anybody else find the use of 777/350 rates as a selling point a little disingenuous? It would be much more useful had they used the 330 since THAT is the airplane the vast majority of pilots will max out on. I couldn't care less what the 777 rates are. (And yes, I would be able to hold it when I am 64)
BenderRodriguez is offline  
Old 06-10-2015, 03:29 AM
  #7022  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez View Post
That is ALL conjecture.

That. Is. True.
Professor is offline  
Old 06-10-2015, 03:32 AM
  #7023  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 40
Default

bag sticker.png

The sooner this gets voted down we will feel relieved!
GenX is offline  
Old 06-10-2015, 03:49 AM
  #7024  
Otto
 
MikeF16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: Turkish Pile Driver
Posts: 1,806
Default

Was there a listing of all the virtual bases and planes that go with them?
MikeF16 is offline  
Old 06-10-2015, 03:49 AM
  #7025  
Gets Weekends Off
 
nwaf16dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 737A
Posts: 1,890
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149 View Post
Very famous Delta story......wanna rethink the answer
I'm pretty sure "The Sharpest Tool" is the gold bug guy.
nwaf16dude is offline  
Old 06-10-2015, 03:49 AM
  #7026  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez View Post
Anybody else find the use of 777/350 rates as a selling point a little disingenuous? It would be much more useful had they used the 330 since THAT is the airplane the vast majority of pilots will max out on. I couldn't care less what the 777 rates are. (And yes, I would be able to hold it when I am 64)
Radial TSquare! Awesome!

Let's send it back!
gzsg is offline  
Old 06-10-2015, 03:49 AM
  #7027  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RonRicco's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Captain
Posts: 827
Default

I do find it interesting who is pushing to "just let the pilots vote on it."
They are part of the same group who basically opposed memrat at every turn, at least when they were the clear majority on the MEC. Of course they were also the same people who spoke over and over and over again about the evilness of a roll call vote, at least till they were in the minority and then they used it without hesitation.

Nothing like consistency....
RonRicco is offline  
Old 06-10-2015, 03:50 AM
  #7028  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 2,165
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez View Post
MCO-GRU would not be an ocean crossing. Hell, NRT-SIN isn't an ocean crossing.
Just a point of clarification...while MCO-GRU does not technically cross an ocean, in the cartographic sense, per our PWA it does.

PWA Section 2.A.182 - "Ocean Crossing" means a flight segment that:
.....
c. To or from South America, as follows:
1. between the United States and any point further south of the equator than 3 degrees, 30 minutes south latitude on the South American continent
There are some concerns with the TA. This isn't one of them.
LeineLodge is offline  
Old 06-10-2015, 03:52 AM
  #7029  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge View Post
Just a point of clarification...while MCO-GRU does not technically cross an ocean, in the cartographic sense, per our PWA it does.

PWA Section 2.A.182 - "Ocean Crossing" means a flight segment that:
.....
c. To or from South America, as follows:
1. between the United States and any point further south of the equator than 3 degrees, 30 minutes south latitude on the South American continent
There are some concerns with the TA. This isn't one of them.
I wasn't concerned about it to begin with, I'd love to drive in and fly to GRU. And thanks for the clarification.
BenderRodriguez is offline  
Old 06-10-2015, 03:57 AM
  #7030  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

Originally Posted by Professor View Post
GZSG,

Missed you buddy.

I think that is your opinion. And as your opinion is valid.

The reality is that at least in pay this TA does a few things:
  • DOS puts us at or above AA rates.
  • Amendable date puts all rates above C2K rates. Well above AA.
  • Pays out more to pilots regardless of where company profits land. There is still no cap in profit sharing.
  • if ratified, the TA will have raised our rates 81.8% since 2008

Those are just facts. You may not like them. Just putting them out there for you and others.
A 50% pay cut requires a 100% pay increase to get to even.

If you are happy hitting 11 year old rates with no inflation, vote yes.

We magically used block hours to get management in balance and lose hundreds of Widebody jobs. For this we got a nickel in per diem.

We screwed all the first officers by taking away their ability to bid all available trips. For this we got 15 minutes of vacation.

This TA has no defense. There was no negotiation, just complete surrender.
gzsg is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices