Search

Notices
View Poll Results: Are you "For" or "Against" the Delta TA?
For
97
13.74%
Against
609
86.26%
Voters: 706. You may not vote on this poll

Delta TA Poll

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2015 | 05:58 PM
  #231  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
To that I say well done gentlemen! I accept the 1.1B in additional value as the most we can get. Settled law. Done.

I just reject the concessions. I therefore propose we return 100 million dollars to management as an act of good faith, and take only 1.0B in additional value over 3 years in the form of pay only. By definition this saves them 100M regardless, even without the concessions, because the concessions were properly costed into it. Right? Right.

They can take that 100M and spend it on executive bonuses, shareholder return, aircraft cap cost reduction, fuel, one extra gate in NYC (LOL I know right) or straight to charity. 100M for BCRF, Habitat, United Way, Kaboom playgrounds, museums, theatre, WWII Honor Flights, Toys for Tots, anything they want!

That's a face saving Win-Win if I ever saw one.

Right? What possible reason could they turn that offer down for?
Every time you post that, I think it should be the first paragraph in every negotiators notepad.

You know, fair and balanced.

"But there's a lot of bad info out there on the internet." DALPA
Reply
Old 07-01-2015 | 06:05 PM
  #232  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by robotrader
Voted yes. Industry-leading contract. Still no cap on profit sharing. Management has track record of doing what they say. JCBA second round resulted in less, not more. Third party who might participate in mediation would see us turning down industry-leading. Don't see the risk/reward of no adding up.
Translation: Be afraid of everything management says. Fear everything. Vote based on fear.

Carl - Advanced Translation Services.
Reply
Old 07-01-2015 | 06:09 PM
  #233  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
To that I say well done gentlemen! I accept the 1.1B in additional value as the most we can get. Settled law. Done.

I just reject the concessions. I therefore propose we return 100 million dollars to management as an act of good faith, and take only 1.0B in additional value over 3 years in the form of pay only. By definition this saves them 100M regardless, even without the concessions, because the concessions were properly costed into it. Right? Right.

They can take that 100M and spend it on executive bonuses, shareholder return, aircraft cap cost reduction, fuel, one extra gate in NYC (LOL I know right) or straight to charity. 100M for BCRF, Habitat, United Way, Kaboom playgrounds, museums, theatre, WWII Honor Flights, Toys for Tots, anything they want!

That's a face saving Win-Win if I ever saw one.

Right? What possible reason could they turn that offer down for?
Dammit, I forgot about this logic string of yours gloopy. This should be printed and handed out to everyone.

To the ALPAholics here: What say you? After you check in with Harwood that is.

Carl
Reply
Old 07-01-2015 | 06:10 PM
  #234  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Every time you post that, I think it should be the first paragraph in every negotiators notepad.

You know, fair and balanced.

"But there's a lot of bad info out there on the internet." DALPA
Yup. DALPA - Fear and Balanced.

Carl
Reply
Old 07-06-2015 | 11:30 AM
  #235  
Doing Nothing
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
Default

Wow 599 people voted no!! That's a landslide rejection. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!
Reply
Old 07-06-2015 | 11:56 AM
  #236  
buzzpat's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,070
Likes: 0
From: Urban chicken rancher.
Default

Originally Posted by cni187
Wow 599 people voted no!! That's a landslide rejection. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!
As opposed to the whopping 96 voting yes? I'd say so.
Reply
Old 07-06-2015 | 04:09 PM
  #237  
Cogf16's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
From: VEOP Retired! 7ER A was last position
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat
I've never voted no. This is a no-brainier NO for me.
Same for me Buzz, never a No, but this one is a a slam dunk NO. Status Quo with our huge PS is good for me. I'm convinced Delta came to us early cuz they needed relief on PS and scope and they won't let us go down that dark, scary mediation path(pun intended). I truly believe that after the dust settles(and our leaders are "reconstituted", we'll be right back at it. If not, so be it. Status quo works for me.
Reply
Old 07-06-2015 | 07:02 PM
  #238  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

Originally Posted by Cogf16
Same for me Buzz, never a No, but this one is a a slam dunk NO. Status Quo with our huge PS is good for me. I'm convinced Delta came to us early cuz they needed relief on PS and scope and they won't let us go down that dark, scary mediation path(pun intended). I truly believe that after the dust settles(and our leaders are "reconstituted", we'll be right back at it. If not, so be it. Status quo works for me.
Ditto!

Denny
Reply
Old 07-06-2015 | 07:06 PM
  #239  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by Cogf16
Same for me Buzz, never a No, but this one is a a slam dunk NO. Status Quo with our huge PS is good for me. I'm convinced Delta came to us early cuz they needed relief on PS and scope and they won't let us go down that dark, scary mediation path(pun intended). I truly believe that after the dust settles(and our leaders are "reconstituted", we'll be right back at it. If not, so be it. Status quo works for me.
Has anyone done the comparison on profit sharing as it is currently written to various company ptix levels going forward?

I believe the results would be quite eye opening. I know for a fact DALPA did not present this at the road show.
Reply
Old 07-07-2015 | 04:08 AM
  #240  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Has anyone done the comparison on profit sharing as it is currently written to various company ptix levels going forward?

I believe the results would be quite eye opening. I know for a fact DALPA did not present this at the road show.
Right now, it is 20% over$2.5b

Ta15 is 20% over $6b

but first you have to subtract out the management employees with equity income (2400 people) before you can use $6b. RAs equity is $770m. That is one guy and that is not a small effect.

Projected profit is as high as $11b in 2017-2018.

If you have done the math, PLEASE, show your work.

Last edited by scambo1; 07-07-2015 at 04:21 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
Sir James
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 06:28 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices