3.B.4
#11
Correct. Plus an additional 1.5% see below.
Now toss in the JV out of compliance annual grievance and add an average 1.5% to that. Even using the pennies on the dollar back room grievance settlement agreed to by our MEC chairman.
The same MEC chairman that TA 15 gives sole authority to for using alter ego foreign airlines to fly international delta passengers in Delta paint.
4.5,4.5,4.5,4.5
Plus profit sharing.
Park me.
Now toss in the JV out of compliance annual grievance and add an average 1.5% to that. Even using the pennies on the dollar back room grievance settlement agreed to by our MEC chairman.
The same MEC chairman that TA 15 gives sole authority to for using alter ego foreign airlines to fly international delta passengers in Delta paint.
4.5,4.5,4.5,4.5
Plus profit sharing.
Park me.
#12
I'm on record as a NO vote, and that 8% isn't anywhere close to being "worth it"--just doing my best to get & disseminate accurate information.
#13
I have explained it on theonlineroadshow.com The slides for the power point are below the presentation.
The leverage actually increases with C2012 because they can try to mitigate 3.B.4. but that means nobody at DELTA gets a raise. The flight attendants are due to file for representation again around the amendable date so that could get interesting. 20,000 FAs is 30% of the domestic non-pilot workforce. Labor difficulty with two groups come 1/1/2016. Park me we'll talk later.
3.B.4. is powerful, that's why they want the change. If 3.B.4. and 3.I. remain unchanged, we have leverage in every Sect. 6 negotiation. We can't commingle PS and rates in 3.B.4. or it looses it's teeth. Both sections work independently, but together they are very powerful. The 3.I. PTIX calculation in the TA also weakens their effectiveness.
Check out the site. Remember FAs at 20,250 and pilots at 12,700. 80,000 domestic employees - 12,700 pilots = 67,300 non-pilot domestic employees. 20,250 FAs are 30% of 67,300 non-pilot domestic employees. The 3.B.4. trigger is 30% of non-pilot domestic employees.
Of course management said they wouldn't pay 3.B.4. What else are they going to say? You have a lever and here's how to use it. Strategic planning???
The leverage actually increases with C2012 because they can try to mitigate 3.B.4. but that means nobody at DELTA gets a raise. The flight attendants are due to file for representation again around the amendable date so that could get interesting. 20,000 FAs is 30% of the domestic non-pilot workforce. Labor difficulty with two groups come 1/1/2016. Park me we'll talk later.
3.B.4. is powerful, that's why they want the change. If 3.B.4. and 3.I. remain unchanged, we have leverage in every Sect. 6 negotiation. We can't commingle PS and rates in 3.B.4. or it looses it's teeth. Both sections work independently, but together they are very powerful. The 3.I. PTIX calculation in the TA also weakens their effectiveness.
Check out the site. Remember FAs at 20,250 and pilots at 12,700. 80,000 domestic employees - 12,700 pilots = 67,300 non-pilot domestic employees. 20,250 FAs are 30% of 67,300 non-pilot domestic employees. The 3.B.4. trigger is 30% of non-pilot domestic employees.
Of course management said they wouldn't pay 3.B.4. What else are they going to say? You have a lever and here's how to use it. Strategic planning???
Last edited by notEnuf; 07-01-2015 at 02:40 PM.
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
I see more and more of you are getting onboard with saving our management team from the onerous costs of this ta...the 'richest' in delta pilot history.
Its simply outrageous that there are pilots in this group that are so committed to the ratification of an agreement that is going to confront our management with insurmountable difficulty.
You can do the professional thing. The right thing. The moral thing.
Or, you can vote 'yes'......you selfish tools.
Its simply outrageous that there are pilots in this group that are so committed to the ratification of an agreement that is going to confront our management with insurmountable difficulty.
You can do the professional thing. The right thing. The moral thing.
Or, you can vote 'yes'......you selfish tools.
#15
Whether our TA passes or not, 1/1/16 the TA profit sharing reduction goes into effect for all non pilot employees.
The reduction on C2012 resutled in the same. The non pilot employees received 2 raises that year. Their normal raise and another for the reduced profit sharing. They were both either 3% or 4%.
2016 will see the same for them.
See Profit Sharing Contrails.
The reduction on C2012 resutled in the same. The non pilot employees received 2 raises that year. Their normal raise and another for the reduced profit sharing. They were both either 3% or 4%.
2016 will see the same for them.
See Profit Sharing Contrails.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
If the company grants next years general raise on 31 Dec 15 instead of 1 APR 16 there would be no 3b4 raise next year. If the following year they paid a bonus instead of a raise there would be no 3b4 in 2017 either.
Last edited by sailingfun; 07-01-2015 at 03:04 PM.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
I'm sure Heiko on chitchat can answer 3.B.4 questions.
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
The non pilot Delta employees will get 2 raises in 2016. One regular raise and another for the reduced profit sharing exactly like C2012.
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
That's not correct. If they do it like contract 2012 they will grant the extra raise 1 JUL 15 or right now. There would normally then be a standard raise on 1 APR 16. They can move that up to 31 Dec 15 or 4 months early and eliminate any 3B4 for pilots in 2016. They could grant a bonus instead of a raise and eliminate 3B4 in any year they choose. 1 bonus in 17 would keep us under current rates until 18 which is when we should be nearing end game on the contract.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



