Quote:
In essence it's not about the "good deal" of a few hundred. It's 100% about disregarding seniority.Originally Posted by Cogf16
I know I'll get pilloried for this, but is it fair that we use negotiating capital for the LCA bidding rule that ONLY benefits a few hundred senior F/O's? Think about it dispassionately. Is it "fair" that senior F/O's can "bid LCA" lines month after month and stay home and or bid GS and we all "pay" for it? And massive training won't stop for years. That is a windfall for a small % of pilots that might not warrant such emphasis. Philosophically, I see the company's perspective and in light of the industry average on this (apparently UAL and AA are the same as the TA language or worse) how can we make this such an important issue. Call me selfish, but now after the failure, I don't see this issue as a must retain item. Fire away.
What if TA 2 had a reverse of the same concept and all LCA awards were run first, then they run the remaining trips for the rest of the captains?