Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Delta to buy stake in China Eastern Airlines >

Delta to buy stake in China Eastern Airlines

Search
Notices

Delta to buy stake in China Eastern Airlines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2015, 01:42 PM
  #41  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by Falcon7 View Post
So you are ok with international partner aircraft painted to look like a Delta plane. Got it.
No, but what if the Chairman vault letters a provision that when he retires, he gets $100 million cash to release the livery?
Mesabah is offline  
Old 07-27-2015, 02:01 PM
  #42  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Falcon7 View Post
That doesn't limit the Company from predominantly displaying the Delta livery on an international partner's aircraft.
Yes it does. Displaying Delta livery on international partners is not a listed permissible activity in Section 1.

Originally Posted by Falcon7 View Post
Look at all the aircraft on DCI. They are all painted in Delta colors.
Yes because that is listed as permissible in our Section 1 as long as the word "connection" is displayed on the DCI livery.

Originally Posted by Falcon7 View Post
Why not these Chinese carriers? What language in our contract prevents it? I don't think Delta even needs to ask anyone.
Your confusion is understandable. Section 1 (Scope) is the written contractual arrangement that delineates what it is we Delta pilots do for the company. Rather than saying the company can do whatever they want unless our scope prohibits it, our scope (as is the case with most major airlines) says Delta pilots must perform all flying in Delta aircraft or Delta painted aircraft that carries Delta passengers...unless our scope ALLOWS that activity to happen with non-Delta pilots.

It's a very big deal because if it was the first iteration I listed above, unions couldn't possibly come up with a list long enough of specific prohibitions of what management can't do. Instead, we in effect prohibit everything unless we specifically allow it in scope.

Hope that helps.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 07-27-2015, 02:05 PM
  #43  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Falcon7 View Post
So you are ok with international partner aircraft painted to look like a Delta plane. Got it.
No, we're not OK with that. That's one of the reasons I voted against the failed TA. I didn't want that permissibility to exist in our Section 1.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 07-27-2015, 02:18 PM
  #44  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Alaska's scope contract is the exact opposite, everything is permitted, and it lists what Alaska pilots are permitted to do. It's literally the worst scope contract in history, and it's an ALPA contract.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 07-27-2015, 02:22 PM
  #45  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
Alaska's scope contract is the exact opposite, everything is permitted, and it lists what Alaska pilots are permitted to do. It's literally the worst scope contract in history, and it's an ALPA contract.
Yes, I knew that Alaska took the exact opposite path to their scope. Awful.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 07-27-2015, 05:04 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Default

Originally Posted by Falcon7 View Post
That doesn't limit the Company from predominantly displaying the Delta livery on an international partner's aircraft. Look at all the aircraft on DCI. They are all painted in Delta colors. Why not these Chinese carriers? What language in our contract prevents it? I don't think Delta even needs to ask anyone.
Without even referencing the PWA....

Why did C2015 then include the language that permitted the MEC chair to allow the company to use the Delta livery on international partners?

I mean, if the company has free rain to do that now under C2012, then why the added language?
DeadHead is offline  
Old 07-27-2015, 05:09 PM
  #47  
Mother’s finest
 
SawF16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 73NB
Posts: 295
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead View Post
Without even referencing the PWA....

Why did C2015 then include the language that permitted the MEC chair to allow the company to use the Delta livery on international partners?

I mean, if the company has free rain to do that now under C2012, then why the added language?
If the company has free reign to do that now, it's protection for us that isn't there now.
SawF16 is offline  
Old 07-27-2015, 05:18 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Default

Originally Posted by SawF16 View Post
If the company has free reign to do that now, it's protection for us that isn't there now.
So DALPA proposed this inclusion to the contract?

I don't remember much discussion on the benefit of adding the language to the contract during the road shows, and I certainly don't remember much of it on the survey.
DeadHead is offline  
Old 07-27-2015, 06:36 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,610
Default

Originally Posted by MtEverest View Post
From a pilot's perspective, Richard Anderson and DALPA are proving to be more damaging to Delta pilot flying than NAI or any other threat in recent history.

Irony: We've been writing letters to government to protect Delta pilots jobs while Delta Inc is sleeping with as many partners as humanly possible using money Delta pilots helped generate to pay the debt....all while giving Delta pilots the middle finger.

Anderson says we cannot operate 777-300's or anything that size economically yet many of our code share/JV's do just fine with them. Delta management doesn't care where the money comes from or about Delta pilots. Just as long as they get rich, nothing else matters.

Btw, has anybody done a comparison of our order book to that of United or American lately. They seem to be able to make money with the large 777's organically. We can only make money with them through equity shares flown by other than Delta pilots
I was waiting for someone to finally draw this conclusion. All that crying about the ME3 was likely a distraction to make you think mgt was on your side and worried about your jobs. A majority of the markets the ME3 operate into are markets that DL doesn't operate its own metal to but the JV partners sure do.
Tinpusher007 is offline  
Old 07-27-2015, 06:48 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by Falcon7 View Post
Get to the bottom of whether or not a foreign carrier flying for Delta can paint a Delta livery on it's aircraft when doing international partner flying. Can they or can't they? There seems to be some confusion about this.
I think the argument could be made that if the company allows a paint job that mirrors Delta, then it could be considered "Delta" flying and therefore the Delta Pilots should be doing it.

Actually I also think Section 1.D.2.c covers it. Thoughts anyone?

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices