|
Originally Posted by Doug Madsen
(Post 1939246)
Since I doubt you'll see another TA for at least six months, you can compare what the ALPA guys said would happen if the recent TA was turned down, as opposed to what Team No said, and see whose predictions proved more accurate -- then going forward, you might listen to those who were right.
|
Originally Posted by SayAlt
(Post 1939156)
Btw and fwiw....this had always been the position in Carl Spackler's "opinions", both generally and on any single issue re: TA1. If he didn't already have a sig line it would be "Read the contract".
Turns out, a lot of pilots did just that. Carl |
Originally Posted by Doug Madsen
(Post 1939246)
Since I doubt you'll see another TA for at least six months, you can compare what the ALPA guys said would happen if the recent TA was turned down, as opposed to what Team No said, and see whose predictions proved more accurate -- then going forward, you might listen to those who were right.
So far, the unofficial spokesperson for Team No (gzsg) is 0 for 2. He said we'd have another TA within 48 hours, and he said the E190s were here to stay. JMO. Team No said we would be screwed if we voted in the TA. Sixty-five percent of us agreed. That's all that really matters. Team ALPA might want to listen to us. It's funny how you want to make gzsg the Team No spokesperson when a lot of us disagreed with his predictions. Why don't you take hockey, Carl, Denny, Ferd's and others predictions? I bet if you answered truthfully you might find out why the TA failed so badly. Hint: You hi lighted the stats that suited you (gzsg: 0-2) and ignored the ones that didn't (Hockey, Carl, et al.: 8-8). Figuratively, you made 80% look like 0%. The above is why the TA failed and why the people you support shouldn't be listened to, because that's what they did, too. |
Team ALPA spent $750K+ of our money for what?
|
Originally Posted by RetiredFTS
(Post 1939343)
Team ALPA spent $750K+ of our money for what?
http://replygif.net/i/369.gif |
Originally Posted by RetiredFTS
(Post 1939343)
Team ALPA spent $750K+ of our money for what?
|
Originally Posted by Doug Madsen
(Post 1939246)
Since I doubt you'll see another TA for at least six months, you can compare what the ALPA guys said would happen if the recent TA was turned down, as opposed to what Team No said, and see whose predictions proved more accurate -- then going forward, you might listen to those who were right.
So far, the unofficial spokesperson for Team No (gzsg) is 0 for 2. He said we'd have another TA within 48 hours, and he said the E190s were here to stay. JMO. |
Originally Posted by Doug Madsen
(Post 1939246)
Since I doubt you'll see another TA for at least six months, you can compare what the ALPA guys said would happen if the recent TA was turned down, as opposed to what Team No said, and see whose predictions proved more accurate -- then going forward, you might listen to those who were right.
So far, the unofficial spokesperson for Team No (gzsg) is 0 for 2. He said we'd have another TA within 48 hours, and he said the E190s were here to stay. JMO. Team Delta pilots aka team NO would like to delay that until we have an opportunity to allow the various local teams an opportunity to re-allocate and re-vet their team captains. My guess some of those new team captains will have a say in who the coaching staff will be. Then team Delta pilots aka team NO will negotiate in good faith on behalf of the delta pilots. Doug, you can sit on the bench but thanks for being on the side of team Delta pilots. |
Originally Posted by RetiredFTS
(Post 1939343)
Team ALPA spent $750K+ of our money for what?
So they spent 750k to end alpa? |
Ha.
Team Yes vs Team Delta Pilots. Good job Team Yes for not thinking that through. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:20 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands