|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1939362)
To move dpa closer to replacing alpa? Which I guess would end alpa national.
So they spent 750k to end alpa? |
Team Yes should be renamed Team Donutbelly
Their chant is "P E B" They love assurances from the 4th floor, and actually believe them too. |
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 1939334)
DM,
Team No said we would be screwed if we voted in the TA. Sixty-five percent of us agreed. That's all that really matters. Team ALPA might want to listen to us. It's funny how you want to make gzsg the Team No spokesperson when a lot of us disagreed with his predictions. Why don't you take hockey, Carl, Denny, Ferd's and others predictions? I bet if you answered truthfully you might find out why the TA failed so badly. The above is why the TA failed and why the people you support shouldn't be listened to, because that's what they did, too. http://replygif.net/i/1222.gif |
Originally Posted by Doug Madsen
(Post 1939246)
Since I doubt you'll see another TA for at least six months, you can compare what the ALPA guys said would happen if the recent TA was turned down, as opposed to what Team No said, and see whose predictions proved more accurate -- then going forward, you might listen to those who were right.
So far, the unofficial spokesperson for Team No (gzsg) is 0 for 2. He said we'd have another TA within 48 hours, and he said the E190s were here to stay. JMO. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1939392)
You can also compare what Team no (DPA) said about contract 2012 and the actual result.
And I recall you voted no on C2012 as well, no? FTB Team Delta Pilots |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1939392)
You can also compare what Team no (DPA) said about contract 2012 and the actual result.
....and do you think everyone who voted against the TA is pro DPA? If not, why do you lump them together? |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1939392)
You can also compare what Team no (DPA) said about contract 2012 and the actual result.
This is a grass roots effort by informed pilots who are trying to take our profession back. It's about our union failing to represent their constituents. Didn't you claim you voted "no"? Or is that what you told your ALPA handlers so you could appear to be in the " in crowd" while you carry managements message for them... http://replygif.net/i/114.gif |
Originally Posted by Doug Madsen
(Post 1939246)
Since I doubt you'll see another TA for at least six months, you can compare what the ALPA guys said would happen if the recent TA was turned down, as opposed to what Team No said, and see whose predictions proved more accurate -- then going forward, you might listen to those who were right.
So far, the unofficial spokesperson for Team No (gzsg) is 0 for 2. He said we'd have another TA within 48 hours, and he said the E190s were here to stay. JMO. Nobody should have any intentions of seeing a TA#2 until the matrix of profit sharing gouge Richards's pocketbook. I would love to sit on C12 until 2018. I doubt RA wants to do that. There is NO incentive for the company to change anything until profit sharing becomes a burden outside of TA/NA 2015. Duggie, You do realize the profits projected for 2016 and 2017 are above 6 billion per year, right? TA in 6 months? really? Forget it. See you in 2018................ |
Originally Posted by ImTumbleweed
(Post 1939400)
This has NEVER been about the DPA. EVER.
This is a grass roots effort by informed pilots who are trying to take our profession back. It's about our union failing to represent their constituents. http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4...fhi2o1_400.gif |
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 1939396)
How so, Sailing? Compare Team No how?
....and do you think everyone who voted against the TA is pro DPA? If not, why do you lump them together? One thing I do know is that what is happening now has nothing to do with the contract. It's a power struggle pure and simple. The losers in the end will be the Delta pilot group. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:20 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands